Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

bit of a redbull white wash hey

yap.

p2 Times

01 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:26.221 35 laps

02 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:26.339 0.118 33 laps

03 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:26.820 0.599 34 laps

04 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:27.022 0.801 38 laps

05 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:27.030 0.809 40 laps

06 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:27.131 0.910 38 laps

07 Jenson Button McLaren 1:27.182 0.961 24 laps

08 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:27.233 1.012 37 laps

09 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:27.397 1.176 36 laps

10 Bruno Senna Williams 1:27.738 1.517 36 laps

11 Paul di Resta Force India 1:28.004 1.783 32 laps

12 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:28.178 1.957 39 laps

13 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:28.222 2.001 37 laps

14 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:28.239 2.018 37 laps

15 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:28.296 2.075 23 laps

16 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:28.455 2.234 40 laps

17 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:28.596 2.375 38 laps

18 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:29.167 2.946 35 laps

19 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:29.320 3.099 43 laps

20 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:29.606 3.385 22 laps

21 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:30.950 4.729 37 laps

22 Timo Glock Marussia 1:31.113 4.892 35 laps

23 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:31.372 5.151 20 laps

24 Charles Pic Marussia 1:31.493 5.272 31 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8195861/Vettel-Leads-Red-Bull-1-2-And-Alonso

boring race is going to be boring..

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

An incorrect setting on his Ferrari caused Felipe Massa to struggle with its handling during second practice for the Indian Grand Prix.

The Brazilian, who had been seventh quickest in the morning, spun several times during the second session and was unable to set a proper laptime after damaging his tyres.

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/103740

p3 Times

01 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1:25.842 20 laps

02 Jenson Button McLaren 1:26.034 0.192 17 laps

03 Mark Webber Red Bull 1:26.108 0.266 18 laps

04 Lewis Hamilton McLaren 1:26.151 0.309 21 laps

05 Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1:26.209 0.367 22 laps

06 Bruno Senna Williams 1:26.214 0.372 24 laps

07 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1:26.521 0.679 15 laps

08 Nico Hulkenberg Force India 1:26.531 0.689 21 laps

09 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1:26.652 0.810 21 laps

10 Romain Grosjean Lotus 1:26.664 0.822 21 laps

11 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1:26.691 0.849 13 laps

12 Pastor Maldonado Williams 1:27.140 1.298 18 laps

13 Sergio Perez Sauber 1:27.162 1.320 21 laps

14 Paul di Resta Force India 1:27.193 1.351 22 laps

15 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1:27.229 1.387 21 laps

16 Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1:27.374 1.532 21 laps

17 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1:27.711 1.869 20 laps

18 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber 1:27.983 2.141 19 laps

19 Heikki Kovalainen Caterham 1:29.035 3.193 20 laps

20 Vitaly Petrov Caterham 1:29.237 3.395 20 laps

21 Timo Glock Marussia 1:29.745 3.903 19 laps

22 Charles Pic Marussia 1:30.298 4.456 20 laps

23 Narain Karthikeyan HRT 1:30.824 4.982 22 laps

24 Pedro de la Rosa HRT 1:30.873 5.031 22 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8197811/Vettel-s-Indian-Practice-Reign-Continues

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You’re all still going on about track cars, he has said multiple times doesn’t intend to take it to the track,  just stick to what was said at the beginning and do the pump and ecu, it’ll get you enough for 230kw at the wheels and has enough poke to be fun for what you want it for 
    • All of that is absolutely true. At any time in the history of these turbos the lottery has always been that it could die at stock boost treated exactly as the factory intended, or it could die when pushed to 10, or 12, or 14, or 16 psi, after a short time, or a longer time, or it could last seemingly forever. You have the combination of all the possible statistical (probably) normal distributions of manufacturing tolerances and quality outcomes, on top of the statistical distributions of failure modes (which might be normal, but are probably biased, like Poisson distributions). You get the lucky turbo and you can beat on it for years. You get the really unlucky turbo and it will crap itself as it rolls out of the factory gate. And every possibility in between. But you can definitely still kill the lucky turbo. It's just that most people didn't try, once they knew they really shouldn't try.
    • Maybe I have Stockholm syndrome but working on an M2 isn't that hard. Getting parts cheaply and quickly is hard, but getting parts same day isn't necessarily hard if you're willing to pay way too much for it at local dealers. There's a lot going on, you need to have a build of ISTA on a laptop and the right cable, if you don't have the mindset of "do it exactly right or not at all" you will probably start seeing cascading failures. Skylines are a little more tolerant in that regard. The car doesn't potentially trash itself if you bought the wrong oil filter like a BMW would. Or trash the entire cylinder head and potentially spin a bearing because someone took the anti-drainback valve out of the plastic oil filter cap. An M2 will also do just fine on track, zero oil starvation concerns, factory brakes are great if you change the pads for a high temp compound + flush with track-ready fluid.
    • The "ideal/formula" that used to be touted was death of the turbo is going to be caused by a combination of 3 things. Heat Speed of turbo (boost level you're pushing) Time   Basically, you can get away with high heat and high boost for short periods. But start doing long hard pulls, or circuit driving etc, and now you've increased time as well which will shred things. From memory when Adrian was drag racing he was running 17psi, on a stock turbo, and running insane speeds. But he also had other additives helping in the setup too. Some people have success at 14psi for a while, while others due to pushing the cars hard for long periods opt down to lower temps. But also, generate a lot of heat (let's say bad tune), for a long time, and you'll be okay, until you try to spin that little guy up slightly. It's the one advantage of dumping a lot of fuel in, you'll be reducing EGT a bit and helping with the heat portion of the above 3 areas.   And these days, stock turbos are that old that there's the possibility of just outright failures due to material age. I'm not shocked that even when used in factory spec that a stock turbo fails when 30 years old. It's a worn out "precision" "balanced" performance item, that's likely no longer precise, or well balanced
    • this... hence I said what I said previously, SMSP nights you see mainly Hondas, Evos, A90s, F80x and the odd VW. The 5 or 6 times I went, I only saw 1x R32 GT-R, and other than that I was the only one in a shit box Skyline.
×
×
  • Create New...