Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Formula One: British lawmakers ask FIA to reconsider Bahrain race, putting 2012 and 2013 events in jeopardy

By: Quentin Spurring on 2/12/2012

The 2012 Bahraini Grand Prix looks so insecure that the latest attacks on its validity, including one by a group of British lawmakers, could be enough to force cancellation of the event.

The controversial Formula One race is scheduled for April 22. However, pressure on the FIA and Formula One Management (FOM) is increased by a regulation stating that any event that is canceled within 12 weeks of its scheduled date will be excluded from the following year's schedule. The deadline for this rule to apply to this race passed at the end of January. If the 2012 race is cancelled, FOM and the Bahraini promoter (effectively the royal family) would have to convince the FIA of their case for force majeure, equivalent to a natural disaster. Otherwise, they would also lose the 2013 event.

Civil unrest in the nation caused the cancellation of the April 2010 race after weeks of similar controversy. Efforts were made to reschedule it later in the season, but it was ultimately canceled in June after protests from some of the teams and their sponsors.

Various lobbying groups are campaigning against the race, notably the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, which last month called on the teams to implement a boycott. This week, members of the House of Lords joined with Caroline Lucas, a Green Party MP in the House of Commons, to write an open letter to the Times newspaper in London to express their concerns about the race.

The British politicians wrote: “We note with concern the decision by Formula One to go ahead with the race in Bahrain scheduled for April. The continued political crisis in Bahrain is a troubling source of instability in the Gulf region, and the lack of any move towards political reconciliation concerns those who wish to see Bahrain move in the direction of greater democratic accountability.

"It was hoped that the recommendations of the Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry (BICI) would provide a starting point for political reform which both government and opposition forces could agree upon. Two months on, we see an entrenchment of the positions of both sides, which risks letting more extreme voices dictate the progress of the conflict. Given the current dire situation, with daily street protests and the deaths of more civilians, we do not believe that the time is right for Formula One to return to Bahrain.

“Bahrain is a major trading hub and financial center in the Middle East, but this brings greater responsibility. Human rights and economic stability go hand in hand, and the government of Bahrain must do more to persuade international events and corporations that Bahrain is a stable place to do business. Until it takes concerted measures to reform the electoral, penal and judicial processes, international observers as well as ordinary Bahrainis can have little confidence that Bahrain is on the path to reform and political stability.

“We urge the FIA to reconsider its decision to continue with the race.”

Meanwhile, the ongoing civil unrest in the nation has created controversy directly connected to the Bahrain International Circuit, which is owned by the Sunni royal family. It has emerged that last year the management of the venue fired 29 members of the staff, most of them from the suppressed Shia majority, apparently for participating in antigovernment protests.

BIC announced last month that, as a reconciliatory gesture, King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa was responding to a recommendation in a BICI report by reinstating all of them. The CEO of the circuit, Sheikh Salman bin Isa Al-Khalifa, said: "The reinstatement of our BIC colleagues is part of an important initiative towards national reconciliation and unity for the kingdom as a whole. I now look forward to working with all BIC colleagues to ensure that we continue to provide world-class track events, which every citizen of Bahrain can be proud to support."

But according to a report at arabianbusiness.com, only three people are actually back in their previous jobs. The Web site cannot say how many have simply refused the offer. Nabeel Rajab, the vice president of the Bahrain Center for Human Rights, said the offer was a cynical attempt to deflect the calls for a boycott of this year's race.

“I very strongly believe that this was just to get Formula One back,” Rajab said. “They should not have just reinstated those people; they should have launched an investigation. The staff don't know why they were sacked, and now they are expected to come back to work without answers.”

In the final analysis, this year's Bahraini Grand Prix will happen only if the big brands in F1--automobile manufacturers Ferrari, Lotus, Mercedes-Benz and Renault, specialists such as Caterham and Marussia, sponsors from diverse commercial sectors such as Kingfisher, Marlboro, Mobil, Petronas, Pirelli, Red Bull, Santander, Total, Virgin and Vodafone--are convinced that they will not damage their image by taking part.

http://www.autoweek.com/article/20120212/F1/120219965

they may as well cancel it anyway, because there's shit currently going down as we speak

and you just absolutely, absolutely know the disgruntled muzzas will show up to poop the party

Renault may not have the most powerful engine on the grid but, according to their F1 director, the company supplies teams with the most fuel efficient.

Having sold the final batch of shares in their F1 team to Genii Capital, Renault's role in Formula One is now solely as an engine supplier.

In that role the French company has excelled in recent seasons, winning back-to-back Championship doubles with Red Bull Racing in 2010 and 2011.

And, according to Jean François Caubet, Renault's F1 director, part of the secret to that success in their engine's fuel efficiency.

"The Mercedes engine is about 15hp more power than ours, so too does Ferrari offer more power," he told AS.

"But, as far as drivability and fuel economy go the Renault engine is out in front as we need less gas."

In fact, so much so that Caubet estimates that Red Bull Racing, the defending Champs, "can start races with 15 or 18 litres less fuel in the tank than their competition - and that makes the difference."

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/7518314/-Renault-power-needs-less-gas-

interesting bit of logic there.

Edited by tweety bird

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
    • Just one more post to show the final result and the original "janky" solution for a laugh. Everything feels really tight and no wobbling at all, very pleased 🙂
    • After drying a few days, time to put her back together 
    • The hot exhaust light will come on not from just the cat being blocked, but it's just a temp sensor, and it's designed to warn you to not do things like park in long grass.   If you've been pushing the motor a bit, it can cause the light to come on.   Second if the cat is rattling, I'd suspect it's not blocked, but instead falling apart inside.   The easiest "fix" until you can get a cat put back in, is to unbolt your one, bash the rest of the insides out, and then bolt it back in.   For a daily driver/street car, I am in agreeance of put a cat in the car. If it were race car I wouldn't care if it were removed.
×
×
  • Create New...