Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

new red bull pics of updated car.

Red-Bull_2727412.jpg

Red-Bull-2_2727414.jpg

2_2727421.jpg

Red-Bull-23_2727424.jpg

77_2727423.jpg

78_2727432.jpg

79_2727433.jpg

80_2727439.jpg

The car features a revised exhaust, similar to that of Sauber, as well as a new front wing to name just two notable differences.

"The chassis is the same, I'm sure, but there's a new front wing and a completely redesigned underfloor and coke-bottle area at the back."The exhaust exits are fairly far forward but there is a down-feeding duct behind them and an

inlet on the top of the floor. It seems they're trying to get the exhaust flow down into that inlet to feed the diffuser.

http://www.planetf1....makes-its-debut

lol, the nose looks like bullwinkles nose. :laugh:

last day of testing

Pos Driver Team Time Laps

1. Raikkonen Lotus 1m22.030s 121

2. Alonso Ferrari 1m22.250s +0.220 115

3. Senna Williams 1m22.296s +0.266 53

4. Hulkenberg Force India 1m22.312s +0.282 101

5. Kobayashi Sauber 1m22.386s +0.356 72

6. Hamilton McLaren 1m22.430s +0.400 115

7. Petrov Caterham 1m22.795s +0.765 101

8. Schumacher Mercedes 1m22.939s +0.909 100

9. Maldonado Williams 1m23.347s +1.317 48

10. Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1m23.393s +1.363 100

11. Vettel Red Bull 1m23.608s +1.578 23

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/97838

Who gives a shit. They have been ugly for years now. If my boy Mark has a cracker of a season with 3 or 4 GP wins than I am happy.

For the first time ever I am interested to hear what Vetool calls his car this year. Ugly Ursula?

hideous Heike (after his mum)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...