Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh, and massa is finished as a pilot in this sport. Todays performance was undefendable

He went off at turn one 6 times... You hear me? Just today... 6 times

Ferrari are in big trouble, even my mate who is just a casual F1 fan turned to me and said that the back of that ferrari is loose as hell. There mnight be some one lap pace in it, but tomorrow is crucial for them

Hopefully get to see nando slice through some of the field tomorrow!

Edited by ctjet
  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Oh, and massa is finished as a pilot in this sport. Todays performance was undefendable

He went off at turn one 6 times... You hear me? Just today... 6 times

Ferrari are in big trouble, even my mate who is just a casual F1 fan turned to me and said that the back of that ferrari is loose as hell

pretty special effort from Massa... nawwwt

and yes, the back end of the Fezza looks wayward as all heck. the blown diffuser ban has not been kind to them

HRT out for the race

suppose its for the best

Are they out officially?

I heard that the 107% was just a guideline and they're still allowed to run.

New regulations allow those who have been overlapped to continue to catch up even on safety car. To hindering leaders when they come through again.

Are they out officially?

I heard that the 107% was just a guideline and they're still allowed to run.

nope. they're out. both cars massively off the pace and over 1 second outside the 107% cut-off

they'd just be moving road-blocks anyway

So is Vettel. Webber out qualified him with no KERS. I shall from this day forward refer Vettle to Cougar, he was holding on too tight. He has lost his edge.

Cougar.jpg

Meanwhile, my man of the match for Quali ...

6843189432_c00750a547_b.jpg

if anybody was really looking he did the job alongside Alonso in a shit car in his first few races with no testing and less experience then he has these days. I really want to believe I can wear my Lotus jacket with pride :cheers:

If only he had dropped Homo whilst he was standing so close

6843189802_d6f34dc09e_b.jpg

todays race should be a good shakedown race for kimi, i don't expect him to do that well, but he'll get there soon.

Romain Grosjean was a huge shock for me, i expected him to be back with Daniel (Daniel did good in his own right by beating his teammate).

the only bad part about massa being so far back is he has no chance to takeout the sob.

Pos Driver Team Time Gap

1. Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 1m24.922s

2. Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 1m25.074s + 0.152

3. Romain Grosjean Lotus-Renault 1m25.302s + 0.380

4. Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1m25.336s + 0.414

5. Mark Webber Red Bull-Renault 1m25.651s + 0.729

6. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull-Renault 1m25.668s + 0.746

7. Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1m25.686s + 0.764

8. Pastor Maldonado Williams-Renault 1m25.908s + 0.986

9. Nico Hulkenberg Force India-Mercedes 1m26.451s + 1.529

10. Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso-Ferrari No time

Q2 cut-off time: 1m26.319s Gap **

11. Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1m26.429s + 0.960

12. Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1m26.4942 + 1.025

13. Kamui Kobayashi Sauber-Ferrari 1m26.590s + 1.121

14. Bruno Senna Williams-Renault 1m26.663s + 1.194

15. Paul di Resta Force India-Mercedes 1m27.086s + 1.617

16. Felipe Massa Ferrari 1m27.497s + 2.028

17. Sergio Perez Sauber-Ferrari No time

Q1 cut-off time: 1m27.633s Gap *

18. Kimi Raikkonen Lotus-Renault 1m27.758s + 1.576

19. Heikki Kovalainen Caterham-Renault 1m28.679s + 2.497

20. Vitaly Petrov Caterham-Renault 1m29.018s + 2.836

21. Timo Glock Marussia-Cosworth 1m30.923s + 4.741

22. Charles Pic Marussia-Cosworth 1m31.670s + 5.488

23. Pedro de la Rosa HRT-Cosworth 1m33.495s + 7.313

24. Narain Karthikeyan HRT-Cosworth 1m33.643s + 7.461

the other big shocks are williams and merc.

very interesting qualy - good to see it all mixed up this year. Grosjean did an awesome job, so did Maldonardo - nice to see the Williams back up there too. And Hulkenberg. Schumacher consistently outpaced Rosberg through Practice and Qualy too. Now we just need one of his storming starts and watch Lewis tear up with memories of Monza lol... I don't think he'll be an easy beat this year :) bring on the race!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...