Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/

http://www.skylinesa...-goods-on-oils/

Both of these thread give "[#10151] An unknown error occurred" whenever I post, the post comes up but I get the error each time, both threads are over 100 pages.

Any idea why this happens? Workaround? Or should we just make another "thread #2" once they get to 100 pages?

Edited by Rolls
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384743-10151-an-unknown-error-occurred/
Share on other sites

I have an idea, on another forum I frequent when threads get in the 100 page range the deleted posts in that thread start to get towards an entire page of deleted posts, this puts the page count as a whole page greater than the amount of posts the users can see, it results in a page that doesn't exist, but the forum software thinks it should, causes strange things to happen.

Maybe put that to them?

That is if it actually gives one - it seems intermittent.

Sometimes i cant post to a certain thread, sometimes i can.

Bit hard to debug intermittent issues like that, when it might not occur for a couple weeks.

As i said - IPB 3.2 has fixed ALL the issues that I know about here on SAU. Everything from permissions to embedding youtube clips. I've also been able to post in the "trouble" threads on the Dev machine... So ye, I think if IPB dont know, then we should go and upgrade sooner rather than later.

That is if it actually gives one - it seems intermittent.

Sometimes i cant post to a certain thread, sometimes i can.

Bit hard to debug intermittent issues like that, when it might not occur for a couple weeks.

In those two threads I posted it happens 100% of the time for me, it does in fact post the post, but it gives you the error as well, so people often end up reposting the post 100 times thinking it hasn't posted.

Does it happen every time for you on those two threads?

No it does not, i just tested again (as i have before)

It's not repeatable and only certain people are having issues. There is no specific trend as to the type of user (access driven). It's totally random with who/when it affects. 100 people might be fine in one thread, but then 5 of those 100 might have issues in another.

Hey Rolls,

Thanks mate, I think that with the time I have off over Chrissy I might just hammer the new 3.2 version so we can release that. There were so many issues in this version of invision and they are all gone in that one. I know its a bastard, but it wont be long. :(

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven't....but a poorly made one would terrify me. Surely a good second hand one is the go, as they don't work hard and no-one wants to keep one after they are finished with it A big consideration would be the weight of the shell you are putting on it....is it a fully dressed chassis or just the body
    • Not stock. All remade. Mostly looks stock because the pipes run to and from the standard holes in the inner guard to get to the return flow FMIC. I'm not sure which question you're trying to ask, because it seems like "stock position" vs "stock position".
    • Hey, it's a GT-R, it's just as significant a moment as mine😁 It's not ideal when things are uncertain; I'm the type of person that always has a set plan for things in life so being unsure of this plan puts me in a weird place mentally.
    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card style AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had no flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
×
×
  • Create New...