Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I recently replaced my standard turbo with a hybrid (high flowed) unit.

With same settings I made this overlay from the dyno-plot to show the differences in spoolup.

I thought why not post it ..

Green=Hybrid

Red=Genuine Nissan

Essentially the Nissan turbo is @1BAR @2900RPM whereas the Hybrid needs 3700RPM for that.

I have no idea whether this is good or bad performance for a hybrid and will do some research.

The car feels not as laggy as the plot might suggest, so I'm quite happy with the result.

Cheers :)

post-33912-0-42142200-1323029123_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/384871-standard-vs-hybrid-boost-graph/
Share on other sites

Well for once the standard turbo fell apart, and yes ... certainly, for more reliable boost/power.

The ECU was mapped to accommodate the higher boost anyhow.

What is the reason for the turbo swap? Will u up the boost and get it tuned to gain more power?

Well,

This graph/post was not about power, but spool-up on same conditions.

(though power increased by 20HP with almost identical boost)

And 'yes' the turbo is a standard high flowed unit with bush bearings.

(good for 20PSI)

It looks a bit like a standard bush bearing rebuild.

Edited by Torques

If it was a bush bearing hi-flow, it couldn't have been expensive.

You can rebuild the cores for $400-$500!

Wouldn't have paid anymore than $1000-$1100 for a bushie hi-flow. They ain't worth anything more regardless of what retailers try and charge

It's hard to say whether that kind of performance is good or bad 'cause you've given us very little info about the highflow unit to base our judgement on.

But standard turbo was designed around minimal lag concept - nylon compressor, ceramic turbo - so it's nearly impossible to even come close to it in terms of lag (or lack thereof). Nissan has done their homework with turbo matching, so the only question is how much more power you'll be able to squeeze out of the new turbo and if the new power level justifies newly introduced lag.

No, it was not as expensive as a BB HKS or Trust or ..

It was around $1100 and is a good quality unit 'made in UK :)' by a company

that deals with commercial turbos on a industrial scale.

I doubt your $400, since you also have to machine the housings etc.

But anyhow, this was not so much the point of the my post and I am quite happy with the unit. :)

If it was a bush bearing hi-flow, it couldn't have been expensive.

You can rebuild the cores for $400-$500!

Wouldn't have paid anymore than $1000-$1100 for a bushie hi-flow. They ain't worth anything more regardless of what retailers try and charge

Amen to that!

Well, all the information I have that it is good for 20PSI and that

it is machined out quite a bit.

Stao (Hypergear) did like units in the past.

As usual with these units there is no compressor map available.

I will know about the turbo's capacity once I raised the boost.

As for spool-up I compared my plot to other turbos and my spool-up looks

OK in comparison.

Yes, I could have bought a nice HKS for 60% more $$$ but I wanted a drop im replacement for the time being ..

But again:

I just wanted to make this data available since I thought people might find it interesting .. :)

It's hard to say whether that kind of performance is good or bad 'cause you've given us very little info about the highflow unit to base our judgement on.

But standard turbo was designed around minimal lag concept - nylon compressor, ceramic turbo - so it's nearly impossible to even come close to it in terms of lag (or lack thereof). Nissan has done their homework with turbo matching, so the only question is how much more power you'll be able to squeeze out of the new turbo and if the new power level justifies newly introduced lag.

Unfortunately max pressure of 20 psi is not enough. Knowing/finding out compressor origin, blade count and inducer/exducer measurements would be a good starting point to give a basic idea about its flow capabilities and max hp, the same can be said for turbine stage.

No one is talking you into spending big ₤₤ on turbo, but people have seen 1 bar @ 3700rpm with GT3076R (e.g. Lithium, The Mafia), which is also capable of 20 psi, :) but as a bouns it will produce significantly more HP.

On the other hand - if you're happy with your purchase and enjoying the car then none of the above really matters, does it? ;)

Hmmm

I have this data somewhere, will be happy to post it.

The CHRA is Garrett.

Sure, boost is not everything, (in the end it is about flow anyhow)

But what you are getting at is compressor efficiency.

With these hybrids you have to trust the manufacturer quite a bit.

They said the turbo is good for about 350-380HP.

Also I have to say that I still have the standard exhaust / airbox on it.

(and only the R34 SMIC)

So all things considered I'm good and happy with what I have ATM.

(More to come)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...