Jump to content
SAU Community

New Garrett Gtx2860R / 2863R / 2867R


Gav

Recommended Posts

Just got my car back with the GTX2863's in my -5 housings, and it is heaps better, I have 30psi with 638hp at the wheels on E85 now, and the response and power in the mid range picked up heaps.

Can you tell me what needed to be done to the -5 housings to get the GTX cartridge to fit? I have a pair of GTRS's that would benefit from this change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you weren't after a big top end then the GTX2860Rs are looking the part compressor map wise . The gaps between GTX60 63 67 are not that big and its interesting the trims go something like 58 56 55 .

On paper the 60mm version looks to be a jack of all trades thought the 63mm one looks to be more GTRS/-10 territory .

Be very interesting to see how the 60mm GTX turbo goes on a standard or mildly warmed RB26 .

A .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you weren't after a big top end then the GTX2860Rs are looking the part compressor map wise . The gaps between GTX60 63 67 are not that big and its interesting the trims go something like 58 56 55 .

On paper the 60mm version looks to be a jack of all trades thought the 63mm one looks to be more GTRS/-10 territory .

Be very interesting to see how the 60mm GTX turbo goes on a standard or mildly warmed RB26 .

A .

Yeah I honestly dont know what to expect from them. 400,450,500. who knows. could only base it on Gav's 63 results @ 27

Should be able to hold 30psi or whatever it takes to get them in range though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surging? Never heard of that with these gtx's.

In the stock -5 housings they will surge apparently.

My GTX 3076 surges loudly at part throttle, as the boost comes on. Sounds cool. :P

What was the setup?

Built cammed 2.6 33 gtr, stock airbox, stock cooler, intakes and piping, stock bov's (probably leaking boost.) twin 3 inch exhaust with split dumps (why split? The wastegates should be welded shut imo. 3 inch dumps ftw ;))

Not sure on the turbo chra, other than GTX in -5's.

post-63525-0-52238800-1383392788_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the stock -5 housings they will surge apparently.

My GTX 3076 surges loudly at part throttle, as the boost comes on. Sounds cool. :P

Built cammed 2.6 33 gtr, stock airbox, stock cooler, intakes and piping, stock bov's (probably leaking boost.) twin 3 inch exhaust with split dumps (why split? The wastegates should be welded shut imo. 3 inch dumps ftw ;))

Not sure on the turbo chra, other than GTX in -5's.

surges??

mine never did, but they are a frickin animal no doubts at all

Edited by AngryRB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a Melbourne car. Yes?

Yep.

I just fitted 3/4 length Xspurt 2000's in it's rail due to the 1000's blocking with that black gunk. I also fitted a 10 micron paper element filter to trap any further crap in the fuel. It's not the first ethanol car to show these blockages, although mine has been fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the stock -5 housings they will surge apparently.

My GTX 3076 surges loudly at part throttle, as the boost comes on. Sounds cool. :P

Built cammed 2.6 33 gtr, stock airbox, stock cooler, intakes and piping, stock bov's (probably leaking boost.) twin 3 inch exhaust with split dumps (why split? The wastegates should be welded shut imo. 3 inch dumps ftw ;))

Not sure on the turbo chra, other than GTX in -5's.

Can you try find out whether they are 60 or 63's?

Peak torque and ~425kw on 2.6 @ 5k seems pretty impressive.

~ 600nm and 300kw @ 4500rpm..

What are your -5 and 2.8 figures piggaz?

Someone care to overlap a graph with piggaz' graph? should do a back to back for us Paul..

Wonder how much the 2.5" housing limits the performance... Either way, no bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These twins would be a ball tearer in the factory compressor housings with Tial rears and external gates welded off the housing, hanging underneath the turbo's. Do it Fatz. :P

Well I do have a kkk t3 twin high mount kit in my shed

Would be a nice upgrade with modern turbos attached and on a 3 litre

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you try find out whether they are 60 or 63's?

Peak torque and ~425kw on 2.6 @ 5k seems pretty impressive.

~ 600nm and 300kw @ 4500rpm..

What are your -5 and 2.8 figures piggaz?

Someone care to overlap a graph with piggaz' graph? should do a back to back for us Paul..

Wonder how much the 2.5" housing limits the performance... Either way, no bad.

Daz was saying this is on a Hubber. Anyone care to have a guess at what the difference is between a hub and roller dyno?

My last figures were 375 kw at 4500, 425 kw at 5000 and 470 (6500) odd up top. Boost was 27 tapering back to 25 top end.

Interestingly was the difference between setting "2" and "3" on my controller. Setting 2 is 23 PSI (give or take) and the midrange was 50 KW less than setting 3.

It would be interesting to have both cars there, get out of one and into the other.

They're 63's IIRC.

Damn stout effort. I'm too wonder if the standard compact housing is/will hamper the GTX's. Power wise it seems up there but it's the apparent surge that might be an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Daz was saying this is on a Hubber. Anyone care to have a guess at what the difference is between a hub and roller dyno?

My last figures were 375 kw at 4500, 425 kw at 5000 and 470 (6500) odd up top. Boost was 27 tapering back to 25 top end.

Interestingly was the difference between setting "2" and "3" on my controller. Setting 2 is 23 PSI (give or take) and the midrange was 50 KW less than setting 3.

It would be interesting to have both cars there, get out of one and into the other.

They're 63's IIRC.

Damn stout effort. I'm too wonder if the standard compact housing is/will hamper the GTX's. Power wise it seems up there but it's the apparent surge that might be an issue.

I'm fairly sure that chequered tunings dyno is setup so it's spot on with local roller dynos.

Gav made 500 on less b

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...