Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...

New results from a fellowzedder with gtx2863's. First graph was previous. 2nd graph are the new initial dyno results.

Snapped intake cam (twice now) so he changed out all 4 cams for stock exhaust cams (solid, no VTC anymore). New mufflers also and even bigger throttle bodies (58mm to 62mm).

 

[âIMG]

[âIMG]

  • 3 years later...

A bit of a zombie thread bump but I seen these turbos being shown by Spectrum Motorsports Solutions here in Canada and though they were interesting. How much of a difference will having anti surge housing make vs just standard housings

272951940_615829429525568_5950475535470813824_n.jpg

272726776_387444479851231_6234949020222769217_n.jpg

The surge slot is not there to improve performance. It is because GTX28 comp wheel will bend its shaft in solid housings, the surge slot is made preventing that problem. It looks like a T51R style sort of a insert, should make some induction noises.

Anyway, Result from an earlier highflow we did. Red line is with solid housing, and blue is with antisurge slot. From a S15, internally gated on E85 fuel

 

 

247125811_1899153450256247_7125461482544349490_n.jpg

269866300_626144128834156_7132807344569484046_n (1).jpg

Edited by hypergear
  • Like 2
On 2/24/2022 at 6:18 AM, hypergear said:

The surge slot is not there to improve performance. It is because GTX28 comp wheel will bend its shaft in solid housings, the surge slot is made preventing that problem. It looks like a T51R style sort of a insert, should make some induction noises.

Anyway, Result from an earlier highflow we did. Red line is with solid housing, and blue is with antisurge slot. From a S15, internally gated on E85 fuel

Any thoughts on the 42R compressor map they have? Seems pretty average to me but I haven't done a detailed comparison against others.

On 2/23/2022 at 3:47 AM, GTSBoy said:

Um....no? That's just twin scroll single turbo, isn't it?

BMW in classic fashion decided that TwinPower could either mean a single twin scroll turbo or two turbos. I still have yet to figure out why they bother with twin turbos on the M3 when it seems obvious to just slap a bigger single turbo on the B58 and call it an S58.

On 2/26/2022 at 7:55 AM, joshuaho96 said:

BMW in classic fashion decided that TwinPower could either mean a single twin scroll turbo or two turbos

Nah, they actually use both words, in both orders, to mean two different things. One order means twin turbo, the other means twin scroll single. They is classically f**ked over by marketeers. Engineers would tell them to go f**k themselves if they had the balls and the corporate power hadn't been usurped by the business school grads.

  • Like 1
On 2/25/2022 at 6:47 PM, GTSBoy said:

Nah, they actually use both words, in both orders, to mean two different things. One order means twin turbo, the other means twin scroll single. They is classically f**ked over by marketeers. Engineers would tell them to go f**k themselves if they had the balls and the corporate power hadn't been usurped by the business school grads.

718191700_ScreenShot2022-02-25at8_08_15PM.thumb.png.1824290f6935e938355eceb520fddc50.png

From: https://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/m-models/m3-sedan/overview.html

On 26/02/2022 at 10:55 AM, joshuaho96 said:

twin turbos on the M3

Because it sounds cool on paper but in reality sounds aids (literally), a M3 with an exhaust sounds horrible. Kind of a reminds me of a stock turbo R32-34 with a loud exhaust, just sounds dreadful.

On 2/26/2022 at 12:51 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Because it sounds cool on paper but in reality sounds aids (literally), a M3 with an exhaust sounds horrible. Kind of a reminds me of a stock turbo R32-34 with a loud exhaust, just sounds dreadful.

The F80 even stock sounds awful even compared to an RB26. I don’t know how but BMW figured out the ideal exhaust setup to make that engine sound as terrible as possible. 

  • Haha 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...