Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this may sound super noob but would like to find our anyway. Would like to add a boost controller on the car n would like to know if the boost hi n low will be dyno tuned? Another question is, doing controller then front mount intercooler a good way to go? Thanks heaps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/385276-noob-r33-gtst-s1-question/
Share on other sites

stock r33 ecus cant be tuned and when adding high boost it will go into rich and retard and will not give u proper boost.either a remapped ecu or nistune are the cheaper options but u will also need aftermarket coil packs and regapped spark plugs for better performance.the list goes on.do a search u will find all ur answers there or go and see a reputable tuner

stock r33 ecus cant be tuned and when adding high boost it will go into rich and retard and will not give u proper boost.either a remapped ecu or nistune are the cheaper options but u will also need aftermarket coil packs and regapped spark plugs for better performance.the list goes on.do a search u will find all ur answers there or go and see a reputable tuner

that makes it sound a bit worse than it is. you can easily run 11 or 12psi safely without any issues and you will see noticable gains without needing a tune.

that makes it sound a bit worse than it is. you can easily run 11 or 12psi safely without any issues and you will see noticable gains without needing a tune.

have u seen wat happens wen u do it on a dyno?or road tune?

have u seen wat happens wen u do it on a dyno?or road tune?

yup. had my 33 running the stock ecu with a front mount cooler, cat back and running about 12psi (and the timing advanced a few degrees) and it made just over 200kw at the wheels (204kw to be exact) on a dyno and AFRs weren't that rich (no richer than at lower boost levels). a mate made 177kw from his 33 at similar boost on the same dyno, but his engine was a bit worn and it had a remapped ecu (was in the car when he bought it, so no idea what it was tuned for).

oh and i forgot to say, you only need aftermarket coils and plugs if the stock ones are cactus. my mates 33 that made 177kw, i installed a larger turbo on it and tuned the ecu he got for it and it made 250kw with the stock coils and copper spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm

yup. had my 33 running the stock ecu with a front mount cooler, cat back and running about 12psi (and the timing advanced a few degrees) and it made just over 200kw at the wheels (204kw to be exact) on a dyno and AFRs weren't that rich (no richer than at lower boost levels). a mate made 177kw from his 33 at similar boost on the same dyno, but his engine was a bit worn and it had a remapped ecu (was in the car when he bought it, so no idea what it was tuned for).

oh and i forgot to say, you only need aftermarket coils and plugs if the stock ones are cactus. my mates 33 that made 177kw, i installed a larger turbo on it and tuned the ecu he got for it and it made 250kw with the stock coils and copper spark plugs gapped at 0.8mm

thats interesting cause i asked my tuner if i could rum 11psi boost with a stock ecu,3.5" exhaust,r34 smic (im now running a fmic) and stock turbo and he said it it would go into rnr and that there are no real gains to be made.

the 204kw u made in ur r33 was it a safe tune so to speak its not goin to blow ur motor or turbo in the near future?

thats interesting cause i asked my tuner if i could rum 11psi boost with a stock ecu,3.5" exhaust,r34 smic (im now running a fmic) and stock turbo and he said it it would go into rnr and that there are no real gains to be made.

the 204kw u made in ur r33 was it a safe tune so to speak its not goin to blow ur motor or turbo in the near future?

11psi shouldn't put the car into rnr, however every car is different. most cars don't hit it until up around 13psi. this is also the limit of what is safe to run on the stock turbo without drastically shortening it's life. this is well documented on this forum. plenty of people will tell you that the stock turbo stops making power at around 12 or 13psi, but that is totally wrong. this is generally said by people who have never tried it and have simply read it on a forum (written by other people who have never tried it and simply read it on a forum too) and they take it as gospel. but i digress.

the 204kw i made in my 33 was on the stock ecu, so it was as safe as any stock ecu (safer than most aftermarket tunes). the AFR's were in the mid 10's at high rpm, so plenty of head room if it started to lean out. it was on the verge of hitting rnr though as there were 2 slight dips on the graph. i'd had to back the boost down by about 1psi on the way to the dyno as it had hit rnr. as for blowing the motor, the stock motor is safe at 200kw. the general concensus is that 300kw is the upper limit of the stock motor (you can make more power than that on the stock motor but it won't last long). it was the upper limit of what's safe for the stock turbo though. having said that i got a hold of a remapped ecu without rnr and was running 14/15psi for about a year with no problems. never had it on the dyno with that ecu (had checked the AFR's with a mates wideband though and they were safe). definitely had more power though. one day i wound the boost back down to 11psi and put the stock ecu back in and it felt much slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 馃槂
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
  • Create New...