Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If the AFR's sat at 15.5:1 at cruise, then assuming you have a power FC, it wont be a failed O2 sensor. Mine wouldnt sit on 15.5 with O2 feedback on as its not in the range for the standard O2 sensor so the AFR's fluctuate between your desired AFR and say 14.3:1 (or at least mine did)

This is under the assumption that you have a Power FC and are using the standard O2 sensor with O2 feedback on.

Does it feel any different to drive at all?

If not is it possible the wideband is on the way out?

double check all your hoses. I had my AFR's change randomly (one day they were fine then a week later they were to lean, then tune to suit, then they go rich all of a sudden) and I'm pretty sure it was due to one of my breather hoses having a big split in it and sucking in extra air the AFM wasnt seeing

This is on the suction side so made it lean, if you were to lose air on the other side it would make it a bit rich

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If the AFR's sat at 15.5:1 at cruise, then assuming you have a power FC, it wont be a failed O2 sensor. Mine wouldnt sit on 15.5 with O2 feedback on as its not in the range for the standard O2 sensor so the AFR's fluctuate between your desired AFR and say 14.3:1 (or at least mine did)

This is under the assumption that you have a Power FC and are using the standard O2 sensor with O2 feedback on.

Does it feel any different to drive at all?

If not is it possible the wideband is on the way out?

double check all your hoses. I had my AFR's change randomly (one day they were fine then a week later they were to lean, then tune to suit, then they go rich all of a sudden) and I'm pretty sure it was due to one of my breather hoses having a big split in it and sucking in extra air the AFM wasnt seeing

This is on the suction side so made it lean, if you were to lose air on the other side it would make it a bit rich

Assumption is off :P NIStune with no narrowband O2 or feedback.

It doesn't feel any different at all, it feels fine. I was driving on the freeway for almost 2 hours, I didn't feel anything change. At the start of the trip things were fine, by the time I got home my wideband was saying I was running stupidly rich.

Assumption is off :P NIStune with no narrowband O2 or feedback.

It doesn't feel any different at all, it feels fine. I was driving on the freeway for almost 2 hours, I didn't feel anything change. At the start of the trip things were fine, by the time I got home my wideband was saying I was running stupidly rich.

Haha whoops

O.K so all the cruise AFR's were tuned manually?

Sounds like something on the pressure side is getting hot and letting some of the air out possibly? but I guess you'd hear that on boost if it had an air leak.......

Short of saying try another AFM or CAS I dont know what else to suggest lol

Yeh cruise AFR's have been set up with the VE trim table, it was all working fine... I don't think it is heat related either, as even when the motor is cold my wideband is reading very rich. It does usually run a bit richer when cold, but never this rich. I have a feeling it's a stuffed O2 sensor. Very disappointing, has only lasted about 5000kms and 3-4 months confused.gif

Oh is the VE Table tied in with 02 feedback?

I dont know alot about the Nistunes. I thought when you said no 02 feedback it was a bit like mine which is running solely off the injection map with no correction from the 02 sensor

not the case?

Well could very well be your 02 sensor

borrow someone elses and see if it fixes the problem?

Oh is the VE Table tied in with 02 feedback?

I dont know alot about the Nistunes. I thought when you said no 02 feedback it was a bit like mine which is running solely off the injection map with no correction from the 02 sensor

not the case?

Well could very well be your 02 sensor

borrow someone elses and see if it fixes the problem?

Oh no no, the VE table is the Volumetric Efficiency. Basically the primary fuel map on the R34 ECU can only go as high as 14.7 as the whole map is flagged for O2 feedback and it can't be switched off. So when tuning the cruise AFR's without O2 feedback, you set the cells in the primary map to 14.7 and then trim them using the VE table until you get your desired AFR.

Will try to find someone with an AEM UEGO near me, don't know anyone off the top of my head though.

spend $100 at a tuning shop putting it on a dyno? Can you still use a consult to check the sensors? I think you can with the nistunes but not sure

If so take it to a workshop with one of them and a dyno and see what voltages the 02 sensor is putting out etc.

I have an AEM UEGO but I'm a fair way away from you :P

Are you sure? or are they self calibrating?

The Innovates we use require calibrating every so often, you have to take them out of the dump pipe and calibrate in clean air or you get quite bizarre readings.

Yeh the AEM's are supposed to be self-calibrating.

KEY FEATURES
  • No free air calibration required - ever
  • Accurate to .1 AFR
  • Includes white and black gauge faces
  • Includes black and silver interchangeable bezels
  • Includes Bosch 4.2 sensor for optimum accuracy and reliability
  • 0-5v analog output included for use with data loggers and virtually any engine management system
  • 0-5v analog output Gasoline values from 10 to 20:1 AFR
  • 0-5v analog output E85 values from 6.6 to 13.2 AFR
  • 0-5v analog output Ethanol values from 6.14 to 12.3:1 AFR
  • 0-5v analog output Methanol values from 4.4 to 8.8:1 AFR
  • 0-5v analog output Lambda values from .68 to 1.36:1

<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...