Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lol whatchu talkin about Alex. I'm sure he knows that, but his talking about possibly buying a house with a friend and having the title

But that was soley dude to not contributing as initial deposit.

Alex just said in numbers what i meant.

Work it out as a % of the deposit vs house purchase price and then an allocation of share/value from there. It's really not difficult.

I'm looking at doing a similar thing with my brother in 2012. It'll be built around not only deposit but also how much who pays off each month etc as i earn significantly more. It's all easy to workout if you both approach it from a logical standpoint. If you can't do that, then forget buying a place together.

And ye - wimmins, always the sticking point. Hence when getting somewhere that is 2bdr, make sure it is nice and SIZEABLE. Get a 2bdr shoebox and then one has a mrs that moves in, 6 months later there is no room to move and people be ready to kill each other.

Deal goes to shit and you both lose out because of it falling apart.

I would do it but 2 things for sure, put your name on the title and get a contract, just make sure its noted on the contract that he paid the deposit and he owns an extra percentage depending on how much the deposit is, if you ever go for any sort of loan out side the house then equity in the house is an asset but if your name is not on the title then i doubt the banks would accept it.

It could well end up in a shit fight but if he is a very good mate and you trust him then go for it, i would also take nismoids advice on plenty of room, expect there to be 4 people living there at times.

If after a few years you come to the conclusiuon that its not work out then sell the house (or one buys the other half) and split the equity.

Yeh it can deffs can work just gotta pick the right person.. Spose it's no more risky than any other two ppl buying house... So much divorce these days you wouldn't believe it

they say the divorce rate is 50% and climbing, probably close to that with long term mates too but you dont have to shell out for a ring and a wedding and keep paying for annoying little shit heads that you only get to see every second weekend if your lucky lol, and no i dont have kids or an ex wife!

Keep in mind that in a partner situation the first home owners grant is used by both people when a property is purchased, and you only get it once.

I assume it would be similar when purchasing with a friend.

Good luck!

Yeh working in real estate opened my eyes to divorce rates. Wouldn't have believed it otherwise to be honest.

Muztek anyreason u don't want name on title ?

No reason really, i havnvt looked into it much really yet, so i thought a house can only be under 1 persons name. so from this thread ive gathered you can put a house under 2 peoples name?

and my mate is looking at a town house at the moment and were thinking of buying off plans so save the stamp duty etc but yer im going to go have a chat with a lawyer

It's just like a rental, you can have as many names as you want.

As Gareth said, you will lose the first home buyers, which honestly isn't "really" a problem.

To then quality for it you would need to purchase another place, move into it etc (or fake it, and have someone staying there off-books, another risk).

Basically getting a 1st Home Buyers grant (for you both, over 2 places) isn't going to happen unless you dodge it up in the short term.

So what you would also do as part of the agreement, is split the "value" of the FHB between the two of you as you are both effectively giving up your eligebility.

He could argue he wants full value due to him supplying the deposit but that's something you'll need to workout between yourselves.

Issue down the track there after you need to then think about is furnishings and what not. Again it can get "petty" if things go sour in a few years time with regards to who owns what, who brought what to the house etc.

Same goes for any spending on property improvement and so on.

Sounds like a mine field, but approached logically and everyone keeps honest records - it should be straight forward

Yeh can be in multiple names best to split the fhog, saving on stamp duty will be a big help whatever % deposit he stumps up should be equivalent to his totall greater % as that money would otherwise grow exponentially plus the interst he is saving u both over the duration of the mortgage so if he pays 10% and everything else is paid 50/50 I'd except 60/40 split in the future if it were me

Have been through this recently. Tennants in Common as Ruffel's said is the more common way of doing this. Mine was a simple 4 pager but had a few other clauses in there including minimum sale price, permission to reside in the property etc (is rented out at the moment).

Few tricks can be done with the mortgage too so you can each have your own subset of the overall. Definately recommend getting a lawyer to do it. Max $1000, any more and it is getting too complex and they are spending too much time on it.

Don't forget all the other things a bank looks for though, savings history, rental history etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good news!!! Changed the O ring today and Iโ€™ve got the โ€œpssshhhhโ€ back when I open the fuel cap ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ It was 100% the O ring because that bloody thing was inside the fuel tank ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ Fitting new fuel pump was a pain as always since the DW is a bit longer than stock. But sheโ€™s running!!! โค๏ธ
    • PWM quite literally just chops the ful 12V voltage on and off at whatever duty cycle you're running it at. If you're running it 100%, then it is on full voltage all the time, same as if there was no PWM. If you run it at 50% duty cycle, it is only seeing the full 12V half of the time. This is broadly equivalent to running it at 6V. But the crucial difference is that motors (and a lot of other loads) don't like being powered at low volts. They will either fail to start rotating, or draw a shit ton of current, or other undesirable things. But if you give them the full volt, and then a short period of no volts, and then some more full volts, then the times when they are seeing power they are seeing all the voltage, and they are happy. But you get the performance out of them as if they were only seeing that fraction of the full voltage. It is not really easy to answer your question about what flow you will get out of it at 50% duty cycle. I can tell you that it is not as simple as you think. For a start, that 460 L/h pump is not going to flow 460 when you're on boost. When you're on boost you will be somewhere down the sloping part of that red line. If you have 15 psi of boost, then the pump can only deliver about 95 gal/h, which is <380L/h. So your simple 50% on 460 = 230 wasn't going to work anyway. But also, it won't deliver 50% of 380 either, because when you devolt or PWM trim th epower being fed to the pump, it is not able to deliver flow or pressure in the same way. 50% duty cycle will probably produce <50% of the full voltage flow. The way to find out what duty cycle you need to run it at at low load (ie, at idle) is to idle it and turn the DC down until you start to lose fuel pressure, then turn it back up above that with some extra for safety. And then you do the same thing at full load, in case it doesn't need anywhere near 100% DC. And if you're careful/caution/prudent, you will also do it at a couple of loads in between so you can shape the DC map against load. It might not be linear between the two end points.
    • Man that dinner was such a long time ago....2010! I would only replace the rubber coolant lines with silicone these days; cheap, readily available and will last for ever. You will need new hose clamps though egย https://justjap.com/products/cooling-pro-silicone-engine-heater-hose-set-black-nissan-r32-gtr-rb26dett
    • I wouldn't look too hard at what they did with the R32 GTR in endurance racing in Australia... Lots of things weren't actually available from the factory in the way those cars ran them... Japan also followed what Fred Gibson was doing here with some of there endurance cars in Japan... Australia is also the reason for things like the Brembo brakes, and the change in the gearbox... And quite a few other tricks they used to pull. There's a few other SAU peeps still on these forums that will have heard the stories direct from Alan Heaphy, Fred Gibson, and Jim Richards when we were lucky enough to have a great dinner with them
    • For all the talk of "these parts are junk" I generally recommend OEM because it's really not as bad as claimed. I have never seen or heard of a case like the N63 where the oil returns completely clog with coked oil for example in ~10 years or less. Would it be nice if it were a straighter path? I guess, but most modern cars use a scavenge pump instead of a pure gravity return. Also the factory lines that would be relatively simple to convert to braided are generally speaking hardlines from the factory. I would consider braided line to be a regression, not an improvement. It's also been engineered such that all the hardlines have appropriate strain relief where needed. There's absolutely room for improvement, for example the HKS advantage heritage intake piping shows just how much can be done to make the turbos fight each other less in OEM twin turbo configuration and reduce compressor surge but it's rarely a simple/straightforward process. I recommend looking at what the group A/N1 cars did, generally speaking the changes they made were necessary and proven in endurance racing.
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...