Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well I think E36 M3s had a 300 Hp 3L all aluminium straight 6 twin cam with individual throttles and twin vanos/VCT .

Not cheap but if you could source parts or a wrecked one everything should bolt/plug in . I remember SK saying that they have virtually 50 50 weight distribution front to back which keeps them light and they handle real well too .

Keeping it in the family would be preferable but otherwise possibly a high CR NA RB26/30 ?

A .

Well I think E36 M3s had a 300 Hp 3L all aluminium straight 6 twin cam with individual throttles and twin vanos/VCT .

Not cheap but if you could source parts or a wrecked one everything should bolt/plug in . I remember SK saying that they have virtually 50 50 weight distribution front to back which keeps them light and they handle real well too .

Keeping it in the family would be preferable but otherwise possibly a high CR NA RB26/30 ?

A .

HA! :rolleyes:

Well picking the BMW up tomorrow getting the 328 diff thrown in for nothing. Total weight of car is 1240 at the moment without a motor but the carpet weights almost 100kg cos it's full of shit will post some pics so people know what I'm getting myself into. Also can anyone conferm a patrol sump could fit the rb

it will be ALOT less hassle to fit either a 1 or 2JZ motor.

Seriously consider this option before you get started on an RB25 install.

I'm sure you could sell your forged RB25 and get a manual 1j front cut for the same price..

but more for 2J

ps - here is one a guy on PF did - 2J in to E30 318i

http://www.performanceforums.com/forums/showthread.php?67260118-FREe30

Edited by GTST

In not interested in the 1j I'm after reliability so forged is the go patrol is rear sump so that solves my sump problem

1J is a better motor than the RB25 anyway. On top of that, the Toyota motors have the inlet and exhaust on the correct sides for BMW engine bays, which makes it easier to fit things in. On top of that, they don't have cross over inlet tracts, so you don't need to worry about engine height so much and don't need to bugger around with aftermarket/homebuilt front entry plenums. You just use the original plenum.

1.5J can be built up for not much more $$ and makes getting a 3L engine trivial, with less legality issues and other hassles than any RB2530 build.

Overall, unless you are starting with a free (ie you've already paid for it) forged RB25 and you're just looking for a car to put it in, it makes a lot more sense to rethink the project in terms of motors that are better suited, rather than just sticking to something comfortable.

If you're committed to the RB, go right ahead. But there is a better way.

In not interested in the 1j I'm after reliability so forged is the go patrol is rear sump so that solves my sump problem

OMG.................................................................................................................................................... LOL!!!!!!!!!

i love rb engines and i have one that i got for a bottle of jack i bought the coupe for 600 with everything but motor this build will cost less then 3 g. i can do all the fab work at the end of the day engine reliability comes down to the tuner and im not asking for mas power just around 300 and a forged rb will give me that. ill be putting a plenum on that iv fabed to lower engine height plus will get a diff sump to make it fit perfect. i dont know 1j or 2j engines but i know rb engines and will have no problem fixing it if it breaks thats if it does which i doubt. im very confident in my tuner to deliver results not cos he is a mate but because he is good plus he is helping me build this car so he will now what is in it and not in it. there seems to be heaps of 1j swaps i want something difernt and want a rb in my bmw coupe. i understand the 1j will be a better fit and more sorted but i dont like the easy option out i like fiddling and doing things differnt thats y in undertakeing this conversion

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...