Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Whats wrong with this state ?

MASSIVE increases in speeding fines, driver's licence costs and water fees will kick in from July 1.

While costs for public transport tickets and motor vehicle registration charges will increase only modestly, those caught exceeding the speed limit will be whacked with fines up to 28.6 per cent higher.

Drivers exceeding the speed limit by less than 15km/h will now pay a $252 fine, up from $196.

A breach of 15-30km/h will attract a $371 fine, up from $312, while fines for those travelling more than 40km/h above the speed limit will be $523, up from $468.

Treasurer Jack Snelling said he was comfortable with drivers who broke the law being further penalised, while denying it was simply a revenue-raising measure.

"No one would be happier than me to not raise a single cent from fines from speeding drivers," he said.

"Road accidents cost millions and millions and millions per year.

"I'm quite comfortable with these measures."

Driver's licence renewal fees will jump from $140 to $185 for a five-year term - a 32.1 per cent increase - with the same increase, to $370 from $280, for a 10-year licence.

Mr Snelling said this increase was a result of last year's Budget and there was not the financial breathing room to unwind it.

The average residential water bill will increase by 40.3 per cent, from $469.60 to $658.70, to pay for the Government's desalination plant. Treasurer Jack Snelling has already indicated consumers can expect a similar increase in the following year also.

Motor vehicle registration fees would increase by between 3.9 and 4.3 per cent while the standard compulsory third-party premium would increase by 2.7 per cent.

For a four-cylinder car, this would mean an increase in annual fees from $578 to $595 - a 2.9 per cent rise overall.

Single-trip tickets for public transport would increase 2.2 per cent to $4.70 while peak-time multi-trip tickets would increase 3 per cent to $30.90.

"The annual indexation factor for fees and charges has been set at 2.9 per cent for 2011-12, reflecting the average increase in the cost of providing the relevant services," Government budget documents say.

The motor vehicle fee increases are about 1 per cent above this indexation factor to fund a four-year program of road resurfacing and rehabilitation works for rural roads.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Treasurer Jack Snelling said he was comfortable with drivers who broke the law being further penalised, while denying it was simply a revenue-raising measure.

what a miserable lying c**t

Yeah its pretty much a hunt for more money

its the point to point speed cameras which they are going to install around Adelaide next year which totally suck

Are point to point cameras used in other cities yet rant.gif

im assuming you mean average speed cameras. they use them a lot in the UK especially through road works

I cant see it working if you have traffic lights ,

im guessing only on uninhibited flowing roads , lets say roads through parklands between Greenhill rd and south terrace .

can anyone clarify ?

well if the northern expressway extensions onto south road (for example) were happening in the uk there would be a speed camera from when you entered the 40kph zone and one at every set of lights so if you averaged more than 40 youd get done

but they could put them at any traffic lights so that if you sped between two sets of lights, even if you slowed down to go through the intersection then you would still get done

well if the northern expressway extensions onto south road (for example) were happening in the uk there would be a speed camera from when you entered the 40kph zone and one at every set of lights so if you averaged more than 40 youd get done

Those cameras you speak of are already mounted on Port Wakefield road's northern half...

-D

Highest taxed state, highest rego costs, highest speeding fines (even before the increases were brought in), all under the guise of "saaaaaaving lives". This is all Treasury's decision..not road safety. Not one police member attended the meeting when this was voted in.

Those cameras you speak of are already mounted on Port Wakefield road's northern half...

-D

But I was told they are only for trucks/log books at this time.

If they didnt increase the fines then they would most probably increase smokes and beer. So we cant win ever.

Yes there are a few cameras on port wakefield rd. You could hold it down and just before the end pull over for 5 min and then it looks like you were going below average speed.

If they didnt increase the fines then they would most probably increase smokes and beer. So we cant win ever.

Yes there are a few cameras on port wakefield rd. You could hold it down and just before the end pull over for 5 min and then it looks like you were going below average speed.

Yeah we could.

Stop the wankers from giving themselves 31% pay rises. I only got a 3% rise last year based upon the cost of living index, so f**k the pollies.

Oh, and stop them from spending money taking their children overseas... and building shit like tram extensions...

Heres a thought.... spend some money on fixing our roads... how hard would that be?

-D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • 255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
×
×
  • Create New...