Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Got tired of the wiseling sound of the turbo(i'm not young any more...)so on saturday i took the pod filter off the car and put the air box back in place...and i looks to take longer to get to full boost(much longer)pod was apexi and airbox has a apexi panel filter so basically it's the same;before it used to jump in full boost now it takes a while and the car car feels sluggish so don't know what's going on...Any ideas????????????

Can you use the pod inside the airbox?

No ,as i said it's an apexi power intake ,even when it's smaller than K&Ns and other Brands still doesn't fit...

Intake leak near the afm?

Nope,checked that already (and damaged a hose clamp over tightening,but replaced it) BTW is it comon to have black deposits in the mesh of the AFM?

Yeh, just fine dust particles. Did you clean it?

No,didn't have nothing very soft so didn't want to damage it ,or you saying if cleaned the sensor with CRC9?(what I didn't)

Get some airflow sensor cleaner from autobarn mate. :thumbsup:

Got some CRC from burson the car is idling more smooth but still slug...anyway thanks for the advice it feels better after cleaning the MAF sensor(that shit really works)

Edited by southern_tango

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • me too wasnt real happy and cost me a penny or 2 to replace
    • But there's the archetype for the name plate! Here's my view on that stupid TÜV ruleset. Buy a brand name aftermarket piece of equipment. In this case, the Mines front pipe we're talking about. Get it TÜV certified on the car. Damage the underside of it, say on a speed bump. Cut out the damaged section, replace with fresh metal. (For the sake of the argument only), continue doing that to the whole pipe until it is all gone, replaced with new metal. Is this grandfather's axe still the same front pipe? The design hasn't changed (much). The pipe walls are in the same places. The flanges are in the same places. It is functionally identical. How does this differ from a pipe that is ever so slightly different in fabrication (ie the number of welds in it, a few mm here and there in terms of where the pipes run, are joined, etc)? Anyone with 0.5% of a brain can see that there is absolutely no way that the performance (power, environmental aspects, noise, etc etc) of it can be any different than the genuine Mines pipe. Maybe even Mines made 2 versions of this design, with the same differences. How would anyone (say a TÜV inspector) ever be able to differentiate between them? And yet, they are so bloody anally retentive about this stuff. Mad. How upset would they be if you had the wrong spring washers on the flanges?
    • Sakura (cherry blossom) tree at the end of a path going through Kabutoyama Park in Nishinomiya, Japan. Taken with Sharp Aquos R8
    • After a fairly extensive search using Japanese terms and checking Minkara etc, I couldn't find anything even close to your front pipe in the photos. I'm no expert but the two pipes merge really close to the flange connected to the catalytic converter which is rather unique from what I've seen, which makes me think it's more than likely a custom front pipe. The welds and 'more pipe sections than usual for a brand name pipe' makes it seem like a custom one.  Here's some photos of an old Mine's front pipe. You can see that it's just 4 pipe sections as opposed to 6, and arguably looks more like a 'production' front pipe:
    • Wtb r33 low side s2 ac line 
×
×
  • Create New...