Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

does anyone know what is an ideal internal catch can volume?

i have designed a can i am getting made and its internal volume

is around 600ml is this enough?

should there be baffles as i am told by some?

i do not want to use stuffing as suggested by some for fear of it finding its way back to the motor. though unlikely i don't want to risk it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/38636-catch-can-internal-volume-how-big/
Share on other sites

Who has been playing with Solid Edge (or another 3D modelling program)

If you are giving your drawing to a workshop to fab up, id be interested in hearing what price you get it done for. Aluminium is best, and its easy to work with so can do some of the prefab and fit up yourself to save coin.

If you are going to a workshop to fab, (as opposed to doing yourself), your best to stick with a circular body, this way you are reducing the amount of welding required, and/or folding, as labour costs 80%, materials only 20%

Even if you are doing it yourself, stick with cylindrical body makes life easier...

Who has been playing with Solid Edge (or another 3D modelling program)

If you are giving your drawing to a workshop to fab up, id be interested in hearing what price you get it done for. Aluminium is best, and its easy to work with so can do some of the prefab and fit up yourself to save coin.

If you are going to a workshop to fab, (as opposed to doing yourself), your best to stick with a circular body, this way you are reducing the amount of welding required, and/or folding, as labour costs 80%, materials only 20%

Even if you are doing it yourself, stick with cylindrical body makes life easier...

all my CAD work is done in microstation java including 2d drawing and 3d modelling i find this is a great program to use.

i am getting a guy i know to build it for me, i need this shape however as i have no room in the engine bay to fit a round catchcan.

Ours is around 1 litre, plus hoses.  We use stainless steel wool inside a stocking, nothing gets back to anywhere.

I know the basic idea with the rocker cover breathers feeding into the top of the catch can, then the bottom hose running back into the sump.

But, if you didn't want to run it back into the sump, could you run a return hose into the inlet tract from the top of the can, with the can full of steel wool???

Or would that just defeat the purpose of a oil/air seperator and basically be the same as the stock setup of breather ---> inlet tract?

Cheers.

Perry

I know the basic idea with the rocker cover breathers feeding into the top of the catch can, then the bottom hose running back into the sump.

But, if you didn't want to run it back into the sump, could you run a return hose into the inlet tract from the top of the can, with the can full of steel wool???

Or would that just defeat the purpose of a oil/air seperator and basically be the same as the stock setup of breather ---> inlet tract?

Cheers.

Perry

Ahem!! basic idea is breathers feeding to bottom of can air then rises through a filter medium usually stainless steel ribbon wool and exits from the top back into the turbo inlet tube after the MAF. If you need to you can add a drain in the bottom. (some of us don't get enough oil in there to need a drain) :)

The stainless filter acts more to help condense the oil out of the air and the ribbon type panscrubbers do this better than normal steel wool

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Is there a diameter difference in the stock to Nismo? If so, the weight alone won't be indicative when comparing flywheels of the same diameter, since the radius of the flywheel acts on the moment of inertia with a square factor, where as mass is linear. Roughly going from a 4.5kg flywheel with radius 20cm, to a 9kg flywheel with radius 14cm would see them act the same. This calc is just here to act as a brief numbers comparison and reflects no actual RB flywheel diameters etc. it also assumes even weight distribution (thickness) throughout.
    • It seems this could be due to a restructure/team direction change... Or... You're working with a different category of vehicle... Or you've decided you'd rather be able to play with your own cars again...   I'm hoping the latter...
    • had 4 weeks off over xmas and well did some stuff to the shed and BRZ, well short of is I don't work full time in supercars anymore as of yesterday.........
    • Did you get any down time over Christmas, or have you had any since to play with this? Or have you given up and are trying to get yourself a second hand V8SC instead?
    • A random thought I had just before I hit "Submit on this post". If brake fluid, in a container in my garage that has never been opened goes bad after 18 months, why can I leave it in my car for 24 months in an "unsealed container"... Secondly, some other digging, and brake fluid manufacturers seem to be saying 5 year shelf life... Me thinks there line on 18 months for an unsealed bottle is pretty much horse shit marketing spin. Kind of like how if you drive a car and don't run a turbo timer your turbo and motor will die horribly...   Where I started on this though... Someone (me) started down a bit of a rabbit hole, I don't quite have the proper equipment to do Equilibrium Reflux boiling per the proper test standards. I did a little digging on YouTube, and this was the first video I found on someone attempting to "just boil it". This video isn't overly scientific, as we don't have a known reference for his test either. Inaccuracy in his equipment could have him reaching the 460 to 470f boiling point range in reality. In the video, using a laser temp gun, he claims his Dot3 that's been open in his florida garage for over a year gets to about 420 to 430 fahrenheit (215 to 221c) Doing some googling, I located an MSDS for that specific oil, and from new, it claims a dry boiling point of 460 to 470f. Unfortunately they don't list a wet boiling point for us to see how far it degraded toward its "wet" point. While watching it I was thinking "I wonder what the flash point is..." turns out its only 480f for that specific brake fluid....   As for testing the oil's resistance, I might not be able to accurately do that unfortunately. Resistance level will be quite a LOT higher than my system can read I suspect based on some research. However, I might be able to do it by measuring the current when I apply a specific voltage. I won't have an actual water % value, but I'll have some values I can compare between the multitude of fluids. I'll run some vague calculations later and see if I should be able to read any reliable amount of current. These calcs will be based on some values I've found for other oils, and see how close I'll need my terminals together. From memory I can get down to 1pA accuracy on the DMM. I don't think my IOT Power Tester has any better resolution.    
×
×
  • Create New...