Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nice Setup.

Which brings me to a question - what is the general thought on mounting the pump or pumps in-surge-tank. ie in the surge tank immersed in the fuel?

I have a 044 in tank (main tank) and it runs almost silently, I assume it stays relatively cool and free from corrosion being in fuel. Certainly when you take the 15 yr old stock pump out it looks brand new, as does all the wiring/fittings etc.

Any reason people don't do this other that it being (maybe) more complex?

And also, rather than running duel 044's, is no one running big single pumps like Fuelab, Weldon etc?

I'm looking to do E85 setup soon and so looking at all these options.

If you look at the pump, you would see that the inlet is normally in the middle of the pump, that means you need to keep that much fuel over the pump, in a large area, meaning fuel can slosh/move around, and you can end up with surge.

The larger your surge tank becomes, the less of a true surge tank that it is...

The idea of a surge tank is to keep enough fuel at the pump, while you're cornering/launching and fuel in the main tank can't be picked up... If your surge tank gets bigger and bigger, then suddenly it can come prone to surge...

Also, most people don't require a surge tank, as they don't run fuel low enough in the tank. If it's just a weekender/occasional track day car, just keep the main tank over 1/2 full.

If you're going for ten tenths, then put a surge tank in, and run only 15 litres in the main tank...

^ that's why internal pumps are mounted vertically.

A lot of these under car surge tanks have pretty ugly aspect ratios, if you can't fit something relatively tall compared to it's width what's the point? You'd want to be doing the numbers on max time at WOT, engine fuel demand and lift pump flow pretty carefully to ensure it stays full.

Alot of it falls onto the tanks desgin.

The ones I've been making for years upon years now have a fairly short height. They do however have a lower chamber that's designed for the pumps to feed from and internally baffled with a float type trap door.

I don't recommend running more than 2 044's from them though.

I've got a GTR using a Weldon pump that actually fills it's own surge tank via a -12 hose into the main tank.

The pump draws from the surge using -12. The surge draws from the main tank via -12 and has a trick pick up system that covers most of the tank floor.

With the return also feeding the surge there is always fuel overflowing back to the main tank.

The way we test how well a surge tank is working before selling them is to fit a clear hose between the surge tank and the main tanks return port for a track day or dyno session

Put a camera on the hose and film it for a few sessions.

Obviously if the tank is working properly it should always be returning fuel to the main tank through your clear hose.

If the tank is not working properly or is poorly designed the fuel in the return line will either become airated or non existent if the main pumps are too demanding.

Obviously there are variables like fuel consumption so they need to be tested and rated accordingly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...