Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok boys and girls

car has been booked in with the tuner and should be ready within a fortnight.

Current mods:

- PFC

- -9s with 18psi

- 3.25" front pipes

- 3" cat

- 3/3.5" catback

- Stock injectors and AFMs

made 270rwkw @ 15psi with a shitty compliance cat and exhaust on it... is prob making around 280rwkw at the moment

new mods (the major ones) will be as follows:

- Haltech ECU

- Haltech boost controller plugin

- Twin Intank bosch pumps

- 1000cc Injectors

- Aftermarket fuel rail

- de cat

- 3.5" catback

- EFLEX Tune (allows to run a mixture of both 98 and e85)

Plan is to chuck it on United e85 and wind the boost up to around 28-30psi and see what she makes

hoping for around 380kw

Stay tuned!

Umair

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387645-stock-rb26-9s-e85/
Share on other sites

i think it will go bang!

no offence, but i doubt that you'll be able to push the -9's past 350rwkw (you'll probably have boost control issues especially above 24psi)

especially on a stock motor, i think you'll find that it'll probably spin a bearing

28-30psi standard engine/head gasket etc?

PT did another stock RB26 with -5s which made 410kw and is holding strong so far...

we'll see... if it pops its just an excuse to rebuild :thumbsup:

i think it will go bang!

no offence, but i doubt that you'll be able to push the -9's past 350rwkw (you'll probably have boost control issues especially above 24psi)

especially on a stock motor, i think you'll find that it'll probably spin a bearing

lets see what happens...

gotta push the boundaries every so often

Cool, do you know the size at the turbo end? Most seem to be 2.5 or 2.75"

Interesting to note Unigroup to like Link's whereas Powertune seem to like Haltech's. Each to their own I guess

I'd say it would be 2.75"

not too sure to be honest

those front pipes look chunky :)

are you gonna run the stock intercooler for that boost/power level?

yep if you boys want some let me know... they pretty good value too... think they set me back $300

running the stock cooler... was going to upgrade but have been told by numerous ppl (including the tuner) that it will be fine

Very keen to see this result!

Standard cams?

The whole flex fuel thing is awsome. Just drive around and not worry about a thing. Does the Haltech setup come with a Ethanol % display?

yep standard cams... wanted more mid range than anything else really

the Haltech doesnt have a e85 guage as such but you can monitor the % if you hook it up to a laptop

cant wait :banana:

I feel ripped off reading this :closedeyes:

I thought this was the end result thread lol... Guess we wait 2 more weeks :D

I'm with a few others, not so sure the -9s will hold 28-30psi. They generally always fall over so very keen to see end result

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...