Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have 2 bare rb30 blocks, one from r31 other from vl

i notice skyline block is heavy than the vl one

skyline 62.1 kg

vl 57.2kg

from digital scale

would the skyline block have more meat ?

Edited by chairman
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/387757-rb30-blocks-r31-vs-vl/
Share on other sites

both 100% rb30

even have the single cam heads to be 100%

:)

i did here skyline were made from better cast iron and vl cheaper but dont know

I believe you but RB20 did come in Single cam and looks the exact same ;)

Moreso you should go by the Cast of "RB30" on the side of the block and the engine number.

afaik the a6 was just so you know its not an a8 (vlt) block. seeing as all 31s were NA (with 1 exception) there was no need for the number anymore?

edit: OP, does the VL block have the machined section where the tensioner relocation goes?

Edited by JonnoHR31

afaik the a6 was just so you know its not an a8 (vlt) block. seeing as all 31s were NA (with 1 exception) there was no need for the number anymore?

edit: OP, does the VL block have the machined section where the tensioner relocation goes?

What exception is that?

Sure it was a 30? And factory turbocharged?

yer thats the one i was talking about and yes its a factory 30e+t high comp motor from memory.

it definately sounds like a s2 block then, which means it cant be some early production block that for whatever reason was lacking somewhere.

  • 5 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not stock. All remade. Mostly looks stock because the pipes run to and from the standard holes in the inner guard to get to the return flow FMIC. I'm not sure which question you're trying to ask, because it seems like "stock position" vs "stock position".
    • Hey, it's a GT-R, it's just as significant a moment as mine😁 It's not ideal when things are uncertain; I'm the type of person that always has a set plan for things in life so being unsure of this plan puts me in a weird place mentally.
    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card style AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had no flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
×
×
  • Create New...