Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow, wait till aftermarket ECU tuners get their hands on that and can play with variable compression from 7.0:1 to 18.0:1. On top of varying fuel and boost already.

I wonder why they're using the whole separate rod and piston driven off the crank to control the compression instead of an electric device with a rod and piston driven off that. Maybe it makes too much mess around/external to the head

They indicated it was a 100% mechanical setup so thats probably why. I wonder what they use to move the actuator that adjusts compression. That is one awesome technology. Now if they can make it strong enough to handle some real power!

didnt play the you tube vid as this computer seems to get viruses from you tube all the time ,VCR is old technology . . was reading about an old test engine used in TAFE,. . . .they could raise the compression of the engine by lifting the head closer/further away from the pistons, not sure how they did it but it was within the grasp of first year students

this is true ^^, if this engine design makes it into regular production cars it will be interesting to see how durable it is compared to the current crop of engines, good to see some new devolopement coming out as there doesnt seem to be a lot going on with manufacturers (apart from hybrid tech) lately

that is neat. the end of it though makes things more interesting as they mention VVT and forced induction. overall someone had a bright idea to make an engine more efficient. that certainly does that. also like the comparison vs hybrid.

Not really a new concept, Saab did this in 2000 and unveiled a motor that had a tilting head which varies the CR. Haven't heard anything since then.

The geared conrod method is different, Saab probably patented the tilting head.

Wonder how the intrinsic strength of both solutions stacks up...

Not really a new concept, Saab did this in 2000 and unveiled a motor that had a tilting head which varies the CR. Haven't heard anything since then.

The geared conrod method is different, Saab probably patented the tilting head.

Wonder how the intrinsic strength of both solutions stacks up...

it would be good if it was out soon on cars, you would be able to have the ecu read the octane of the fuel in the tank and adjust the CR too suit , , ,run anything from cats piss ULP to E85 (and anything in between)without having to lift a finger

  • 3 weeks later...

Nissan's version is better if you look at that tiny gear wheel below the piston that has to take alot of force you can tell that's a potential weak point. Plus nissan's version suits a reciprocating motion better.

http://www.nissan-global.com/EN/TECHNOLOGY/OVERVIEW/vcr.html

Yeah it's old technology - another way to do it is to set up the head with high comp ratio and use psid controlled valves to dump pre combustion fuel/air mixture into exhaust. It's wasteful and not good for the environment, plus adds too much plumbing around the engine.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My hold point for future mods is that I want a OEM detachable hard top first, but, finding one is a pain, MX5 Mania are looking for one for me, but, as hens teeth are more common, finding one in Australia is proving problematic  I can get a OEM one from overseas, hell, you can still get new ones in 'Merica, but, shipping is a absolute killer and I cannot justify the cost, or the risk of it being damaged during transport As for the aftermarket hardtops, whilst they do the job of being a hard top, and are fine for a track car, they don't seal well (read: leak like a sieve in the rain), and you need a plastic/poly rear window, plus they are a bolt in option only and not made to be easily removed I liked how the hard top on my NB could be fitted, and removed, by myself, in less than 5 minutes I know it sounds bad, but I'm waiting for someone to write off a car with one so I can swoop in on their pain, it will go to a good home though, so my guilt of this is tempered
    • I’ve got one on mine and it’s fine, 
    • No, you don't want to plug the vacuum line, as that will turn that side of the booster into an air spring and probably make it feel worse. I'm not saying that the GTR master itself doesn't need a booster. I haven't paid attention to the GTR one to know what size it is cf the non-GTR ones. But when you think about it - they have to do the same job, which is to move a little slave piston a few mm to do what it is supposed to do, and that final action is the same on all the cars. So, it is very unlikely that the GTR MC is any different than the others, because it has the same pedal stroke and the same output requirement. The booster just makes it feel easier. I'd suggest you probably have an actual hydraulic problem. It's totally common on these old shitboxes.
    • Ye, in terms of bolting up the "Conversion" from a GT to a GTT is effectively "Use GTT parts for everything" Except the subframe itself, because you won't want a HICAS/4WS subframe. Remember your ABS system will be different too, thanks to GT being the S15 3 sensor system, instead of the R34 4 sensor system for wheel speed. I do not know how people get this to work given R34 diffs do not have a provision for an ABS sensor (they are on the tone wheels of the axles). I assume***** people use S15 gear/R34NA forever when they realize this - Or they convert it to a rear diff/axles that are R33 style which I presume has the singular speed sensor on the diff itself, but then you have to wire it all in and...and... and...
    • Foreshadowing was never so easy.
×
×
  • Create New...