Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The aftermarket one also available is "powermax" comes in a green box.. can get from Supercheap.. Around $70

I think the N1 could be overkill on a street car.. Apparently people do notice some cooler temps, but I've never had overheating problems. Maybe on a track car coul be worthwhile, but otherwise..

  • 1 year later...
  • 2 years later...
  • 1 year later...

yeh you have to modify the n1 pump, an rb30 one will work fine.;

also read when i was doing it, that the n1 pump, with its larger spacing and one less blade, is not suited for traffic situations, great on the open stretch or track, but idling away it doesnt flow as much... as its designed for higher than stock rpm, hence the larger space and one less blade.

  • 2 weeks later...
Yeah I'd like to know this as well - my RB25 water pump is leaking so looking at a possible replacement.

The RB25 water pump has an elongated hole for the small bolt on the top side of the pump, the other RB pumps don't have the elongated hole. The location of the small bolt hole in the RB25 blocks is different to the RB20 and Rb30 and consequently if you use an RB20 or RB30 water pump you won't be able to install the small bolt. All the other bolts however, align correctly.

I have found in the past that Nissan is cheaper to buy an RB25 water pump than Autobahn.

  • 4 weeks later...

my water pump has f$%^&d itself last night. rang autobarn and they said they all the same. rang supercheap and in 3 diff books he was looking through he had 3 diff answers.

what the hell is goin on with this shit???

trust me after a massive headache of doing the water pump at home (3 times)... u you all know timing belt/harmonic balancer has to come off?

just go to nissan, buy the RIGHT pump for ur car and have less headaches!

Edited by DjeMz
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...