Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ill be running the non bb version of the 43sat iwg on my car, hoping to tune it next weekend yet that will depend if a part i ordered tonight gets here in time, if it doesnt then whatever day it gets here ill throw it on my dyno and see how it goes. stock rb25, 3"tbe, fmic, so that should give you a better idea if you can wait a week or two

Keen to see your results Scott.

For the atr43g3sat, Is the standard a journal or ball bearing chra?

mines just the standard journal bearing, got it last week, looks pretty nice, hopefully i can post in this thread after i tune it, otherwise ill drop half a tank of e85 in,

  • 1 month later...

Keen to see your results Scott.

ended up getting 270 out of it at 20psi, had some boost issues where it would taper down to 18psi by redline, yet even after fixing that i wont be able to join this thread as limiter bashing a standard rb isnt good with there oil issues and i now need new big end bearings so rb30 time it is

copped up to 25psi and a lot of knock along the way...copped a fair bit of limiter abuse...also ran for a week with a dud fuel reg and was leaning out to 15:1 under full load...pistons had very slight det damage but bottom end is otherwise perfect and will probably be used again when i eventually sell it.

Best read of the thread haha

Looks like I'm unable to make anymore power, I added in 4 degrees of timing and it only made 327kW so I backed it off and ended with 325kW

Tried more boost, but it did do much except give me a little more torque and a glowing gate lol.

There's a chance this motor has had it as I lifted the head at a track day a couple of months back.

(oh yeah, I had semi slicks on which generally reads lower on the dyno)

If anyone is interested, I've got data logs from runs on the dyno.

Back again, 372kW @ 1.75bar (1.8bar spiked a little)... motor has not popped and even went to a track day on the 30th of May. Motor did push some coolant, I believe the OEM head gasket isn't too happy.. even with ARP studs.. might go and torque them up some more LOL.

Details:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/page-54#entry7731169

post-22311-0-16951700-1463922770.jpg

  • Like 3
  • 1 month later...

Hypergear 21u high flow 2015 spec @ 19psi on United E85, 312rwkw, 474nm

-nismo 740cc injectors
-nismo 3inch cat back
-blitz LM return flow cooler
-adaptronic ecu
- E85/Flex goodness
-Castrol edge 10/60 oil

No failure, only 1 month of running so far.

2b757bffbf181af17aa627246133926e.jpg




Damn it I have to fix my boost coming on late issues! [emoji20] yours is before 4k rpm


I've also got a slight response issue. Its hitting full boost around 3700. It used to be all in by 3450. Still trying to track down the issue but haven't had much time to spend on it. This was my previous boost graph from last year before any problems.99f46b5ac1d94bbd5c0ed2eb5b7b6084.jpg

Stock S1 motor. not even head studs.

Z32 Nistune ecu

550cc sti injectors.

Holset he351cw @ 18psi

cx racing topmount

4" complete exhaust

407 hp and 314 ft lbs

 

I know its a big turbo. but right now my only issue is how late it spools. Ive seen similar holsets on smaller motors spool as early as 4200. according to my tuner the only way to get it to spool sooner is to change timing which will make me lose a lot of power.

 

Opinions would be nice.

20160726_102516 [99870].jpg

20160727_175703 [99869].jpg

2 hours ago, r33canada said:

Stock S1 motor. not even head studs.

Z32 Nistune ecu

550cc sti injectors.

Holset he351cw @ 18psi

cx racing topmount

4" complete exhaust

407 hp and 314 ft lbs

 

I know its a big turbo. but right now my only issue is how late it spools. Ive seen similar holsets on smaller motors spool as early as 4200. according to my tuner the only way to get it to spool sooner is to change timing which will make me lose a lot of power.

 

Opinions would be nice.

20160726_102516 [99870].jpg

20160727_175703 [99869].jpg

Is your VCT working?

You may get some weird AFM reverberation issues having it that close to the turbo as well. Although it doesn't look like it can go anywhere else haha, have you looked into a blow through setup?

I do have afm issues slightly with how close it is. I also knew I was going to. I wanted to have a unique setup without doing what everyone does with for forward manifolds plus already had the return flow IC.

I'm going to pull the tune and take a look at it and check about vct.
I know there's not much room for things but can you explain the blow through setup?

Those HPX AFM don't suffer too much from reversion, also will read more air than a Z32 (provided it's in the correct tube and meshed both sides).

I recently did a S15 with a R35 AFM and it was hitting 5V before it was even making 200kW.. turns out the tube was too short and wasn't meshed (create some uneven flow and turbulence). I advised the owner to mesh both ends and extend the tube/pod. Made a healthy 238kW towards the end with the injectors at 99% DC.. then turns out, he didn't remove the OEM pressure relief valve inside the fuel tank.. now that's removed it's going to go back on the dyno for Round 3. This is a S15 with Nistune, on full flex :)

if anyone is using a R35 or HPX AFM... I suggest this:

3-4-in-air-w-hardware-300x225.jpg

i believe my tuner mentioned that the maf could be relocated into the intercooler piping but its not ideal, or the way my setup is with the stock intake manifold and the piping layout its not ideal. im not sure. probably has to do with space as well.

I took a look at the tune. it shows that vct is set but i have no way of seeing if its working i dont think.

if anyone is proficient with nistune and wants to take a look at my file let me know. 

I just believe its possible to spool at the very least 1000 rpm sooner. cause right now i can pretty much gear through 1st and it will make about 5 psi.. pretty much all motor and this hits 18 almost right away in second.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...