Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Why?

Well when I had it done it was laggy, maybe too far along the scroll created too much turbulence I'm not sure. But its certainly possible as the actual fabrication of the gate pipe with split right up to the gate was great work from my fabricator. Pics in my old build thread.

Yes and no.  It is possible to do two pipes to a single wastegate properly.  There was a thread showing that on here recently.  I would also be possible to do it wrongly.  You need to keep both halves of the system isolated from each other when the gate is closed.  If the two pipes from the two halves are open to each other before the gate, then the pressure pulses will leak and ruin the effect, thus making it pointless.  That particular example off a twin scroll housing (above) doesn't look like it would be internally divided in the pipe running to the wastegate.  I therefore suspect that it is not a good implementation.  Obviously it will still work and make lots of power.....but what about the spool behaviour, etc etc?

That video seems like a very weird way to do it. It sort of rolls over both sides of the housing and has a very large diameter gate pipe.

I would look at doing it directly off the housing like a conventional single scroll system. Turbo will be GTX3067 with a tiny (physicslly) rear housing.

That's the problem with trying to do it on twin scroll housings.  On a single scroll housing, you have a spot just downstream of the housing's inlet flange where the scroll is nice and big - nearly the same size as the manifold connection itself.  So you can put a single pipe off of that (or the gate direct onto it) and get the gas to flow properly.  But a twin scroll is already compromised by having the gas paths in that same location squeezed into a tall-narrow shape.  You can only access the short sides of these paths, so can't weld on a round/squarish port for the offtakes.  And they're right next to each other and the offtakes need to be right there in the same spot next to each other.  It's just all so compromised that you'd be better off with gate(s) off the manifold.

  • 3 weeks later...

I wonder how much of a difference it makes having the pressure communication inside the wastegate, someone go make a simulation pls.

Because I'm wanting to go a similar style manifold, saves a massive headache with piping. 

Edited by owen1r

That's not what he's asking.  The wastegate is a valve.  When it is closed it SHOULD block off the communication between the two halves of the manifold, and if it doesn't, that's bad.  When it is open, it will impose a pressure drop on the flow passing through it.  It will be like the end of any pipe, any orifice, etc etc.  The pressure pulses that come down the pipe from one half of the manifold will leak into the other half of the manifold because of that.  The question is.....how much does it negatively effect it?

I think it somewhat defeats the purpose of the whole split pulse idea.  But I am willing ti accept that split pulse with turbos is more about getting the thing to spool better.  Once the gate is open, the pulses can probably leak between halves of the system without too much negative effect.  But that's just a gut feeling.

  • Like 2

I would of also thought that you'd struggle to get a good seal between the divider and the wastegate piston with varying brands of wastegates etc. I'd expect there to be a gap of a mm or two.

I'm hoping someone like fullrace will chime in with some data, as I believe they've done plenty of simulations.

I was thinking that it would leak right where the gate valve meets the divided part in the pipe. I assembled the gate and send a camera inside to check if it leaks, by seeing light. It's not perfect but very very close. Make me think what would happen when it heats up on expansion if it would leak even more. Or seal better. I guess in drag racing all that's not to important, but I wanted this style in the event I wanted to use it on another setup. I do agree that my reasoning for this was all the piping/plumbing.
I always get my manifold from Kyle at 6 boost. Hands down the best for the cash.

I had an etm twin scroll single gate manifold and it worked fine with a Garrett t04z but when I changed to a precision it wouldn't control boost.
I welded it up and went with welding the gate off the turbine housing. Problem solved and 500rpm less lag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 65601-05U00 is the hood latch. 62550-08U31 is the support that holds it to the radiator core support. They are all super discontinued so I don't really have any great leads on how to source this stuff.
    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
×
×
  • Create New...