Jump to content
SAU Community

True Twin Scroll Turbo & Manifold Design Discussion


Recommended Posts

Looks like you were using an old school Jap gate on a decent sized precision housing. Was the gate kept divided or was it just open to both scrolls?

My issue is I'm looking at doing it on a tiny turbo housing so getting good flow to the gate and keeping it divided will be difficult

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the problem was the direction of the gas flow. I have a book on turbo design and setup. It's always best to have the gate plumb in a angle that best for gas flow. So the best would be off the turbine housing, as to get that same angle off the manifold would require lots of space which most setups don't have. It's the best way to control boost. But from what I gather here it's all about the way the pulse hits the turbine wheel. And just adding the gate on the turbine housing is just like having a fake twin scroll manifold, hense it will control boost better as it's easier to release the exhaust gas/pressure. But I would say if it's not separated all the way to the gate valve like most have mentioned. It's not a true twin scroll. It's about faster boost not to much the control of it. I do agree that the control is important. 1489285042538.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anywhere in the collector would work well only if it can be angled in the direction of the gas flow from what I understand will control boost the best. And the gas/flow doesn't have to change direction in such a hard angle. But the plus is a different story and like GTSBoy said if there is a merge anywhere before/or an opportunity to do so will reduce the response of boost coming in faster. Just my 2 cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/03/2017 at 10:10 PM, r32-25t said:

I've always been skeptical of these single gate twin scroll manifolds 

I had at one point too - but the more I thought about it, the more I figured actually so long as the manifold was built like the one pictured above... the less it's really a thing at all, probably at worst it'd be much of a muchness with a full twin gate setup, and possibly have it's advantages.  I certainly have been impressed with the Sinco single gate divided entry setups I've experienced :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've jumped on the divided single gate bandwagon because of plumbing headache of twin gates. my only concern is boost creep due to 90 degree turn the flow needs to do to get out, but with high enough exhaust manifold pressure I'm hoping that shouldn't be too much of an issue.

the divider is very well constructed to the contours of the wastegate valve face, and the seat ring JUST fits over the ends. for all intents and purposes they are insolated until the gate opens.

attachment.php?attachmentid=98332&d=1488

 

attachment.php?attachmentid=98329&d=1488

Edited by burn4005
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've jumped on the divided single gate bandwagon because of plumbing headache of twin gates. my only concern is boost creep due to 90 degree turn the flow needs to do to get out, but with high enough exhaust manifold pressure I'm hoping that shouldn't be too much of an issue.
the divider is very well constructed to the contours of the wastegate valve face, and the seat ring JUST fits over the ends. for all intents and purposes they are insolated until the gate opens.
attachment.php?attachmentid=98332%26d=1488696503
 
attachment.php?attachmentid=98329%26d=1488696495


I'm is exactly the same way mate. I see you have a EGT on every runner? I take it that's it's for individual cylinder tuning.?
It's very nice. Do you cap them all off after the tune.?? Sorry for all the questions mate.

I think if the runner for the gate was just angled abit when it was welded to the collector it would be way better at controlling boost at lower pressure. Keeping it angle as much as it can in the direction of the gas flow.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



I'm is exactly the same way mate. I see you have a EGT on every runner? I take it that's it's for individual cylinder tuning.?
It's very nice. Do you cap them all off after the tune.?? Sorry for all the questions mate.

I think if the runner for the gate was just angled abit when it was welded to the collector it would be way better at controlling boost at lower pressure. Keeping it angle as much as it can in the direction of the gas flow.



I was always under the impression that those ports on each runner where for anti lag hahhah please correct me if I'm wrong
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For anti lag what exactly? You were very very wrong haha



No mate hahhaa.....I'm definitely not wrong.
Do a Google search and you'll find a myriad of info on what I'm talking about...
Below are a couple of pictures of examples of antilag systems...

Here's a link to an aftermarket kit I'll be using - https://brewedmotors.com/blog/rally-style-anti-lag-system-tuning.html

IMG_7765.JPGIMG_7766.JPG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the site seems to have crashed and now restored but many recent posts have been lost.....?

Anyways my last post was something like "I might just start an antilag thread to get more detailed info from other who have had hands on experience with it, unless there is already a decent thread out in SAU"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 month later...

Has anyone done a GTX3585 v band twin scroll manifold with twin gates?  I am looking at the GCG merge collectors to fabricate a manifold for my GTX3582 turbo.  Any pics will be helpful as getting a proper merge collector for twin scroll is proving to be a big problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The two diagrams are equivalent. The R32 one is just one sheet out of about 3 showing everything in the whole car all at once. And without knowing the functionality that occurs in the modules, they are both equally opaque.
    • 8v - 2.48ms 9v - 2.15ms 10v - 1.74ms 11v - 1.41ms 12v - 1.15ms 13v - 0.99ms 14v - 0.89ms 15v - 0.82ms 16v - 0.81ms I'm running these values on my RB20 Neo with 570cc Denso R35 stock jets and it's great. Also bought a set for my Legnum VR4, love these injectors!
    • Thanks for your reply,  Those blue/green wires running to the actuator aren't attached to anything, so I'm not sure how the central locking is still working. I will have to take a good look tomorrow, I don't have the car with me. After googling it seems like a pretty common aftermarket actuator which even uses the same green/blue wires the immobiliser required. i'll test everything tomorrow and if it's working i'll melt the solder, strip it, resolder and neaten it all up with some heat shrink. I don't have to understand it if it works hahaha I just don't want a fire/ short circuit. That R32 diagram looks more like a continuity chart? Can you make sense of this form the R34 manual? 10V is probably due to very flat battery, i'll recheck as well tomorrow, I did have to jump start it haha. Thanks again!  
    • So, COM doesn't mean comms. It means common. What common itself means will depend on the type of device. For a two directional actuator (ie, one that can push and pull on the same output rod) then the common will typically just be the earth connection. There will be at least 2 other wires. If you put 12V on one of the other wires, then the actuator will push. On the other 12V wire, it will pull. Can't quite make out what is going on with the wiring of your actuator. It appears to have several wires at the actuator plug, but there only appears to be 2 wires where its loom approaches the door control module, with at least one of the others cut off. I don't know these actuators off by heart. I'd have to look at a wiring diagram for one before knowing what the wires were about, and that's despite me having to replace one in my car not all that long ago. Just not interesting enough to have dedicated memory set aside for trivia like that any more. That actuator is an aftermarket one, not the original one, which probably died and was replaced. That might require some sort of bodge job on wiring to make it work. Although nothing should justify the bodginess of the bodge job done. As to the soldering job on the door module's loom plug. Ahhahhahaha. Yes, very nasty. Again, I cant tell you what any of those wires do. You'd need to study the R34 wiring diagram (if you can find one that shows the door module). I don't think I have any. I'd have to study the R32 diagram to start to understand what mine is doing, and again, even though I've had a problem with mine for the last 25 years (where it locks the passenger door when the driver's window reaches top or bottom of travel) I'm just not interested enough to try to to work it out. So long as it's not burning down, it's fine with me. Here's the R32 GTR diagram, which, confusingly, has rear door lock actuators and window motors on it!! As you can see, unless you understand the functions of the door lock timer and the power window amplifier, you'll never be able to work out how it works just from the diagram. I don't imagine that the R34 one is any better. Hopefully an R34 aware bod can help. FWIW, the two wires that are cut and joined look like they are both power supply - so hopefully it is not fatal to join them. The 10V you measured on the cut off free end of one of them is concerning. You'd expect 12V, and it might be the reason for the bodge job joining them together.
×
×
  • Create New...