Jump to content
SAU Community

True Twin Scroll Turbo & Manifold Design Discussion


Recommended Posts

Not a bad job, at least the angle promotes good flow, but damn its tiny. I would have gone for a much larger gate.

What is it with everyone running 38mm/40mm gates, no love for the 50's and 60's? There is power to be made there...

Here is an exhaust I worked on recently, Not an easy job but it got the results. 0.82 split GT3076. Aircon lines remain intact.

post-63525-0-59200500-1343268317_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks so nice Scotty. Was it expensive? Looks like there would be a fair bit of work in it.

Is there much performance loss with running a single gate off a split pulse manifold with a twin scroll turbo?

Obviously it won't be as good as a twin gate setup, but do you loose much response, power or torque anywhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, it cost him around 2 grand for the full system, plus he had intake and cooler piping made.

I would think if you can get the gate to seal the two halves a single wastegate would work just as well, as long as it was big enough and had good flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is funny how people scoff as using a single wastegate on a twin scroll manifold and turbine housing without fully understanding what difference it would make. Who ever started the rumours that you needed two "or else" must be laughing and selling a lot of wastegates!

Anyway, dividing the wastegate flows right up until the wastegate (such as the photo in the link) would be much better than just merging the two flows before the gate (like on a Greddy or HKS manifold).

Yes it is in a great spot before the turn on the turbine housing to control boost very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6boost do a split pulse single gate manifold don't they? Has anyone tried one out?

If you are going to the trouble of buying a twin scroll turbo, I would have thought you would get a decent manifold to get the most from it rather than putting the gate off the turbine housing? I was always under the impression people only did the gate off the turbine when wanting to run external gate on the stock manifold

Edited by Mitcho_7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the highest pressure point it makes sense to me to run the gate off the housing which is why I talked Artz into it. The idea for my setup, (if I ever get around to making it) is to get the flow straight through the turbo, cutting out the back of the scroll and making the wastegate the priority when it is open. With twin scroll just run the splitter up to the gate and the same will apply.

Too many setups I see favour the turbo at the expense of the wastegate flow which would mean too much power is lost up top imo.

post-63525-0-86152700-1343276303_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is funny how people scoff as using a single wastegate on a twin scroll manifold and turbine housing without fully understanding what difference it would make. Who ever started the rumours that you needed two "or else" must be laughing and selling a lot of wastegates!

Anyway, dividing the wastegate flows right up until the wastegate (such as the photo in the link) would be much better than just merging the two flows before the gate (like on a Greddy or HKS manifold).

Yes it is in a great spot before the turn on the turbine housing to control boost very well.

The whole point of twin scroll is to work in the firing order 'pulse'.

Would make sense...

Manifold is divided

Turbine housing is divided

... that the wastegate would follow a similar premise.

Be good to see some actual information/testing/data with single vs dual with a true T/S setup to dispel - I'm assuming you have some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am assuming you do thinking it is undoubtably better.

You can't have evidence for everything (I see you honking that horn a lot be-littling people) sometimes it is just not feasible. You should understand that there is more "best practice" using engineering principles in industry that have been established over a long time by some very smart people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole point of twin scroll is to work in the firing order 'pulse'.

Would make sense...

Manifold is divided

Turbine housing is divided

... that the wastegate would follow a similar premise.

Be good to see some actual information/testing/data with single vs dual with a true T/S setup to dispel - I'm assuming you have some?

This was my understanding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6boost do a split pulse single gate manifold don't they? Has anyone tried one out?

If you are going to the trouble of buying a twin scroll turbo, I would have thought you would get a decent manifold to get the most from it rather than putting the gate off the turbine housing? I was always under the impression people only did the gate off the turbine when wanting to run external gate on the stock manifold

I had a twin scroll 6boost with single Tial 44mm and twin scroll T04z.

Worked mint... I also don't see the huge need for twin gates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well i have a "true" twin scroll setup on a RB2530 with twin gates, GTX35 with 6boost

I also have a Twin scoll setup for a RB2630 with single HKS 60mm on a 6boost - i havnt picked a turbo yet for this motor.

the RB2530 i should have some results within a month or so.

the RB2630 i wont have any results for at least 9months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mico - Whoever said that? If they have, they're being pretty bold about pulling the wool over your eyes - the whole point to split pulse is you are splitting the pulses and reducing exhaust collisions etc. If you have 6 pulses feeding into one collector, no amount of design is going to change the fact that you'll have twice as many high pressure pulses pushing for the same space in the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The two diagrams are equivalent. The R32 one is just one sheet out of about 3 showing everything in the whole car all at once. And without knowing the functionality that occurs in the modules, they are both equally opaque.
    • 8v - 2.48ms 9v - 2.15ms 10v - 1.74ms 11v - 1.41ms 12v - 1.15ms 13v - 0.99ms 14v - 0.89ms 15v - 0.82ms 16v - 0.81ms I'm running these values on my RB20 Neo with 570cc Denso R35 stock jets and it's great. Also bought a set for my Legnum VR4, love these injectors!
    • Thanks for your reply,  Those blue/green wires running to the actuator aren't attached to anything, so I'm not sure how the central locking is still working. I will have to take a good look tomorrow, I don't have the car with me. After googling it seems like a pretty common aftermarket actuator which even uses the same green/blue wires the immobiliser required. i'll test everything tomorrow and if it's working i'll melt the solder, strip it, resolder and neaten it all up with some heat shrink. I don't have to understand it if it works hahaha I just don't want a fire/ short circuit. That R32 diagram looks more like a continuity chart? Can you make sense of this form the R34 manual? 10V is probably due to very flat battery, i'll recheck as well tomorrow, I did have to jump start it haha. Thanks again!  
    • So, COM doesn't mean comms. It means common. What common itself means will depend on the type of device. For a two directional actuator (ie, one that can push and pull on the same output rod) then the common will typically just be the earth connection. There will be at least 2 other wires. If you put 12V on one of the other wires, then the actuator will push. On the other 12V wire, it will pull. Can't quite make out what is going on with the wiring of your actuator. It appears to have several wires at the actuator plug, but there only appears to be 2 wires where its loom approaches the door control module, with at least one of the others cut off. I don't know these actuators off by heart. I'd have to look at a wiring diagram for one before knowing what the wires were about, and that's despite me having to replace one in my car not all that long ago. Just not interesting enough to have dedicated memory set aside for trivia like that any more. That actuator is an aftermarket one, not the original one, which probably died and was replaced. That might require some sort of bodge job on wiring to make it work. Although nothing should justify the bodginess of the bodge job done. As to the soldering job on the door module's loom plug. Ahhahhahaha. Yes, very nasty. Again, I cant tell you what any of those wires do. You'd need to study the R34 wiring diagram (if you can find one that shows the door module). I don't think I have any. I'd have to study the R32 diagram to start to understand what mine is doing, and again, even though I've had a problem with mine for the last 25 years (where it locks the passenger door when the driver's window reaches top or bottom of travel) I'm just not interested enough to try to to work it out. So long as it's not burning down, it's fine with me. Here's the R32 GTR diagram, which, confusingly, has rear door lock actuators and window motors on it!! As you can see, unless you understand the functions of the door lock timer and the power window amplifier, you'll never be able to work out how it works just from the diagram. I don't imagine that the R34 one is any better. Hopefully an R34 aware bod can help. FWIW, the two wires that are cut and joined look like they are both power supply - so hopefully it is not fatal to join them. The 10V you measured on the cut off free end of one of them is concerning. You'd expect 12V, and it might be the reason for the bodge job joining them together.
×
×
  • Create New...