Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I've done a search and have found plenty of information on the V44, though not much on the G4. I suspect there's a fair bit buried in threads, but that could take awhile... If there is already a thread containing the information I'm after, please point me in the right direction and shut this one down.

So basically, due to issues with my stock computer pulling fuel/timing/giving DTC's etc, I'm considering the option of going to one of these full stand-alone ECU's. At this stage, I know my tuner can tune the VIPEC, have not spoken to him about the Link yet. From looking at the features, these two ECU's are very similar, which is why I'm making this thread. Could anyone with experience tuning or simply running these ECU's let me know how easy they are to tune, etc?

Secondly, there are a few main features that I am interested in:

1. I want to go forward facing plenum in the future, so individual cylinder correction is important. I know the Link can do it and I imagine the VIPEC can too, correct?

2. I also want to setup tables for IAT adjustment. Is there any advantage with one ECU over the other here, or is it much of a muchness?

3. The only motorsport feature I MAY consider using is traction control, though probably won't bother with that either. I have currently got a Greddy Profec controlling boost, so may not bother with boost control through the ECU unless it is really worth it?

4. Wideband input will also be important, though I believe they can both do this?

5. Flex fuel. I want to have the possibility of setting up flex fuel in the future, I think this is where the Link may come out on top. Does the VIPEC support an ethanol content sensor too?

And finally, QuickTune. I believe both ECU's have this, but exactly how good is it? It sounds great when described by the manufacturers, but is it really as easy as setting your desired AFR, plugging in a wideband and letting the ECU do it's thing or is it a bit more confusing than that?

Ease of use is probably one of the more important factors, which is why I'm interested in QuickTune so much. But any other advantages/disadvantages between the two that aren't so well explained could help me out too. I will speak to my tuner this week about them, so this may become a moot point, but any help in the mean time would be much appreciated :)

Cheers,

Martin.

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Pretty sure the Vipec is just a rebadged Ling G4

Do you have a Hypergear turbo? If so you can get the Adaptronic Plug in for around $1200 comes with internal 4 bar map sensor.

$44 for the air temp sensor which you can wire into the ecu loom so its quite neat(I have some spare pins if you need one)

Has a great auto tune function.

Also can have traction controll(You need to hook into the front wheel ABS sensors), launch control and Andy(The creator) has just demoed how anti lag works on the ECU.

Only down side i can see is it is wastespark and semi sequential injection, this didnt bother me too much.

Yeh I did briefly consider the Adaptronic, but they don't make a plug in version for the 25DET Neo and when it's only another $300ish to get the Link or Vipec then I'd rather just pay that bit extra.

They are the same unit. Unless you are going to buy from the factory

http://www.linkecu.com/

just get the Vipec from your tuner which will give him his dealer margin and make him feel better disposed towards you!

So they are literally exactly the same? I thought I read that the Link came with a 7 bar map sensor while the VIPEC only has a 2.5. Must have read that wrong cos I can't find it now. Bit annoying because I want to run 23 psi :/

Another thing, where does the map sensor usually get installed? Is there much point going to the map based ecu if the sensor gets installed in the plenum given that I'm planning on changing to forward facing?

as above both are the same.

both have internal map sensors, should be able order either with upgraded map sensor.

auto tune function is ok. just input afr you want at what load point and will adjust fuel map, this requires a wideband to be hard wired to ecu.

go the vipec from your tuner :thumbsup:

So they are literally exactly the same? I thought I read that the Link came with a 7 bar map sensor while the VIPEC only has a 2.5. Must have read that wrong cos I can't find it now. Bit annoying because I want to run 23 psi :/

Another thing, where does the map sensor usually get installed? Is there much point going to the map based ecu if the sensor gets installed in the plenum given that I'm planning on changing to forward facing?

you have to spec the G4 up to get the 7 bar sensor its not standard, standard vipec skyline plugin comes with 3bar anything post july 2011 from what i was told recently (2.5bar pre july 2011)

the map sensor is soldered to the ECU board, it requires a vac line be run from the inlet plenum into the cabin and to the ECU. it doesnt matter what inlet plenum you have unless you change it post ecu install and tune. MAP is sensitive to engine modifications if they improve engine efficiency they throw the tune out.

you have to spec the G4 up to get the 7 bar sensor its not standard, standard vipec skyline plugin comes with 3bar anything post july 2011 from what i was told recently (2.5bar pre july 2011)

the map sensor is soldered to the ECU board, it requires a vac line be run from the inlet plenum into the cabin and to the ECU. it doesnt matter what inlet plenum you have unless you change it post ecu install and tune. MAP is sensitive to engine modifications if they improve engine efficiency they throw the tune out.

Ah, well if it comes with a 3 bar sensor then I'm all good.

So the vac line gets plumbed into the plenum? The plan was to change the ecu now to sort out the current problems and then change to a forward facing later down the track. I could still do that, though I guess I would have to get my tuner to install the plenum, could have done it myself.

There is a small built in map sensor but for serious boost you just get a higher value map sensor (doesn't have to be the Link one - I have a GM) which is bolted in the engine bay. It is wired to the ecu and the vacuum line goes to the plenum. It is not a big deal - most plenums will have multiple take-offs or you can put one on - its not a major and is easily transferred.

yes, the end result after the 11ty billion page Vipec thread (and what we all know) Vipec is a rebadged Link.

I think it's on the Link website somewhere saying that they (Link) "launched the Vipec brand" etc etc

So don't worry about which one can do what... they're the same thing.

I went to a link G4 from a nistune and it ironed out all my lil bugs id say go the G4 purely for the fact it goes into the stock ecu box so isnt really detectable. Ive seen pics of the vipec is it a bulky unit that will need to be mounted somewhere?

Id recommend getting the extension harness while your at it :)

A little cable that plugs into the board to give you a few extra's. Another 5v source, another ground and a couple inputs etc.

If you were planning on running alot of boost, then getting a bigger MAP sensor will take up another input. And if the car is a street car, there aint many left for other stuff.

Once you use the Boost solenoid input for boost control, the AFM input for IAT, and the narrowband input for Wideband..

You get the idea :)

Great ECU. Been running the GTS/GTR Link G4 for a year or so now.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
    • So my car is finally back from paint! This took an absolutely insane amount of work and should get it's own build thread - but I didn't build it. It was completed by Troy @ https://scalekustoms.com.au/ I originally bought the AOSHIMA URAS Type R kit while I was in Japan, it's supposed to look like this when assembled: Now, I thought that was cool enough until I opened the box with Dismay, as there's no way I could possibly have completed it. The thing is 1/24 and has details down to the steering wheel horn button, which is a 2mm diameter sticker. I originally wondered if someone could make it at all, as is - But then things got a little carried away. It's worth noting that the model does not have an openable bonne, let alone engine bay, OR an openable boot. - Troy has worked wonders with 3D printer and presumably better eyes than I will ever have. My photos suck, so I will post up some of his in-progress ones he sent to me during the way. Unsuprisingly, he is very detailed. A lot of these are out of order. But he: 1) Made a LS engine and an engine bay appear out of thin air 2) Made the bonnet removable 3) Printed the rims I will buy in the future (or any rim you want) 4) Printed and added the wing that is going on 5) Tinted my back windows as this is what my car has IRL (privacy glass) 6) Added a licence plate. 7) Somehow did the interior 8) 3D Printed my actual seats 9) Made the exhaust under the car connect even though this is likely invisible. 10) Created a boot with my fking battery box, power steering reservoir, subwoofer and toolboxes back there. To say it's insane is an understatement. And I f**ked it all up because when I was re-mounting the wing (it broke in transit) I spilled glue everywhere and ripped paint up and Gregged the rear half of the car. Which about makes sense. Also, this arrived on the same day. Quite the change from: I spent 16 hours per day over the next 3 days pre-christmas putting the interior back together, mounting lip, fixing various bodykit problems with window mouldings, etc. and servicing, rebuilding my 370z brakes to go on the car 'soon', messing with heights to check clearances for new wheels, etc. I also had a foray into mounting wiper-mounted washer jets which was an absolute disaster. The bodyshop has welded (and painted) over the stock jet locations for reasons unknown to everybody (i.e they forgot) I also wanted to wire in the oil pressure sensor on Christmas Eve which was a BAD IDEA. You do not know terror like pulling your ECU apart, pinning in half-fitting pins that aren't the right ones, but trying anyway because it's Christmas eve, putting your ECU back together and having a no-start condition with a fuel pump not priming. Then you undo all your work and the fuel pump still doesn't prime. So after all that terror and horror and pain and tedious disassembly, the issue was the relay in the boot which seems to have died/stuck when I was turning the car off and on about 700 times testing shitty washer jets. I also re-wired the fuel pump power plug which fell apart in my hands. I am very happy I had 3 extra pre-made ones from a few posts/last Christmas's breakdown. https://bluewireautomotive.com/products/10-x-pcm-ecm-ecu-terminals I have put an order for these in, so I can actually add the pins to the ECU properly. The commodore ECU does not have the pins for Oil Pressure via ODB2. However the ECU can support it if you create the pins and wire them in. So for round two, and somehow attempting to route that into the engine bay through my impossible engine bay grommet is a fight for another day. It's 40C in Melbourne tomorrow, I am half tempted to drive the car with the aircon on to deliver presents to my partner's family and see if it helps with the overheating-on-40C-days-in-traffic-with-aircon-on-only issue that the vents were intended to solve. Do I feel lucky?
    • Yes, while being... strictly unnecessary. Tuning is a bit like quantum physics. You don't need to understand what Schroedinger's equation actually means. You just need to run the computation and accept the answers. With tuning, you just push page up/down until the exhaust tells you that you've got the fuel right. The VE can stay hidden behind the curtain like the Wizard of Oz and you'll never need to know what he looked like.
×
×
  • Create New...