Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The only spot available currently is the rear oil drain (the issue being getting the line from the catch can to that drain) or the other potential option is we drill and tap the sump on the drivers side.

The catch can took 2L of oil after 7 laps of long track and 3 laps of short track at Barbagallo. That left my sump with just over low on the dip stick which is just enough to be on the safe side considering I have a Greddy extended sump and pickup. So even if nothing drained back during the run I could do 10 laps and still be ok, other stuff on the car is going to give up before then.

Well I would suggest if it did that at Wanners you will have real trouble at Collie. Anyway it is up to you. You can pull the sump off the thing without taking the engine out. Not a fun day at the office but manageable.

Who built your motor out of interest?

Well I would suggest if it did that at Wanners you will have real trouble at Collie. Anyway it is up to you. You can pull the sump off the thing without taking the engine out. Not a fun day at the office but manageable.

Who built your motor out of interest?

Stock motor, not built. Doing low 64/54's at Barbagallo so it's not exactly a Sunday drive.

Maybe I'll just avoid Collie :P

Edited by SimonR32

Yeah well the fat rings in the stock motors are actually pretty good at reducing blowby which is the root cause of the problem. Forged engines are more of a problem.

The difference with Wroo/Collie is as follows:
You make blowby/push oil into the heat on the straight - ie when you are accelerating. When cornering at Wroo it is mostly turn right which matches the drain holes in the head of the motor (on the passengers side) So you get some drainage. Also if the catch can is where the battery used to be and is plumbed back it can drain to the sump easilly under cornering load.

Unfortunately Collie is almost all left handers which allows neither of those things to happen. Hence it is much, much harder to sort hte problem there.

So anyone who tells you they have a cure ask them if it worked at Collie and dont beleive them until it has.

Also Collie is much more fun to drive around than Wanneroo.

Gav Beer's comment (who runs the same system) was Collie was the worst for oil issues. I think he has been through 3-4 catch can set ups that didn't work well enough. He mentioned that this catch can was the only one that worked for him and he could literally feel the oil draining from the catch can after runs at Collie by putting his hand on the catch can.

I did also do a few laps of long track with boost turned right up to 1.6bar (hit boost cut at 1.74bar about 6 times during 2 laps) so I doubt that would have helped with the blowby. Turned boost down to 1.1bar for the rest of the night but I'm not sure if that helped at all with the problem, for all I know all the oil had already gone to the catch can.

Edited by SimonR32

drian back + one way valve

or just knock your reves back 1k

i know which i would choose

Only rev it to 7500 on the track already so f**k going 1000rpm less.

Just ordered one of these;

http://streetautoparts.com.au/index.php/aeroflow/valves/one-way-flap-valves/aeroflow-one-way-flap-valve-10an-black-af612-10blk.html

Don't know if anyone has used one before but I'll let you know what it's like.

From my experience the Nismo oil air separator don't work that will in practice. I've been chasing oil issues on a 450rwkw rb26 for about 12 months now, we found that oil was pushed from the sump through the Nismo separator back into the catch cans (this was on the dyno), i've put a 1 way valve on it now

Since then i've plumed the dip stick to the cam cover to bleed pressure out of the sump, and even though it's only going through a 1/4" BSP fitting, it made a big difference.

catch cans are a band aid solution, the core of the problem is pressure in the sump.

Only rev it to 7500 on the track already so f**k going 1000rpm less.

Just ordered one of these;

http://streetautoparts.com.au/index.php/aeroflow/valves/one-way-flap-valves/aeroflow-one-way-flap-valve-10an-black-af612-10blk.html

Don't know if anyone has used one before but I'll let you know what it's like.

make sure you remove the spring out of it, otherwise it will never drain back

From my experience the Nismo oil air separator don't work that will in practice. I've been chasing oil issues on a 450rwkw rb26 for about 12 months now, we found that oil was pushed from the sump through the Nismo separator back into the catch cans (this was on the dyno), i've put a 1 way valve on it now

Since then i've plumed the dip stick to the cam cover to bleed pressure out of the sump, and even though it's only going through a 1/4" BSP fitting, it made a big difference.

catch cans are a band aid solution, the core of the problem is pressure in the sump.

Interesting, mine has no issues on the dyno or straight line stuff. Only once it's out on the track does it start filling the catch can.

I do like the idea of plumbing the dipstick to release pressure in the sump, would love some pics on how you went about that. I guess then the only pain in the ass is how to actually measure oil levels?

The RB26 is on my garage floor ATM, so i'll take some pics of that tonight. The catch can return with 1 way valve is in my car, which isn't at my house. I'll be working on my car during the week, so i'll get some pics of the catch can return then.

Spitting oil out on the dyno is pretty rare. The tuner guessed that the Nismo separtor was being used as a vent, and carrying the oil from the turbo drain up to the head.

The RB26 is on my garage floor ATM, so i'll take some pics of that tonight. The catch can return with 1 way valve is in my car, which isn't at my house. I'll be working on my car during the week, so i'll get some pics of the catch can return then.

Spitting oil out on the dyno is pretty rare. The tuner guessed that the Nismo separtor was being used as a vent, and carrying the oil from the turbo drain up to the head.

Oil issues on the dyno are uncommon simply because the engine isnt on song long enough for it to become a problem. It needs to largely fill the cam covers before it starts pumping oil out. They have a reasonable volume which is enough for a pull on a dyno. On the track it is common for them to be on full throttle through the gears and then be subject to lateral and/or longitudinal gees - hence they accumulate oil & sump pressure and start pumping oil everywhere.

Venting the sump is one way of fixing it. It makes up for the lack of cross sectional area in the head of the motor to let the oil return to the sump and the blowby go to atmosphere. How much extra area you need to fix it depends on how much blowby you have.

The problem in all this is it is near on impossible to recreate on the street. Atleast if you are not being a complete spanker. It only happens on the track. Hence many, many RB26's that would otherwise exhibit the problem dont - simply because of the way they are used and not because of the way they are built.

I'd reckon the fix is to use a thicker top ring, fixate on the end gap of that ring and obsess over the run in procedure.

Yes lots less oil. Before I put that line on the car had 2 x 3l catch cans. It still has them, but the 2nd one only catches the E85 vaper. I have recently added this new -10 line as a breather, which should fix all the breathing problems once and for all.

2E3B65CD-F56F-474E-AB58-BB038532E220-447

Going to drain the catch can to start with and see how it goes, plan is to run a -6 line with one way valve around the back of the head to the rear turbo drain.

If that doesn't work well enough I'll think about running from dip stick to catch can or cam covers

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
  • Create New...