Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

when you get a HKS exhaust and it says Jasma that means its considered road legal in japan

atleast AFAIK anyway, not like any of us have a japanese handbook to rules and regs lol

elrodeo666 could probably clarify if he saw this

I can't get the link I'm on my iPhone it is the type of mani I'm looking for puts the turbo between cil 1 and 2 also has a external waste port it all seems good made from 304 stainless 2.5mm thick. I was going to make one for my sr but this looks the goods even has a t3 t4 flange

yeah, I know they make those fancy manifolds tuned lenght cause it helps with spool up times etc..

But I have been wondering lately if log style made to roughly the same dimensions as the stock manifold but with larger ports/runners .

If it would actually flow better than the stock cast item ..You,d think it would have to flow as well at least..

you could mount the turbo up on a bit of an angle and have the gate path flow out underneath it..

here this will get ya started.. :)

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/RB25-TURBO-EXHAUST-HEAD-FLANGE-NISSAN-/280816991408?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item4161ff3cb0

How much power/boost are you after, if your thinking of a log style manifold i would assume not much, maybe look into extractors and rear/remote mount the turbo, would make things a lot simpler and it would hied the turbo.

yeah thats another idea..

But why couldnt you boost it with a log??

stock mani does alright with 20psi..sometimes more

You mean stock turbo manifold or stock non turbo manifold?

The flow would slowed for a log style manifold at high boost (even at low boost but not as much), if you do a log style and then upgrade to a proper turbo manifold you will notice boost being made a lot easier and quicker with a proper styled turbo manifold V's log style, if you have the know how and tools to make a proper manifold then do it that way, if not i would go extractors and rear mount, i personally wouldnt bother with a log manifold unless its something you have sitting there and a dump pipe to suit.

I want the turbo sitting between cil 1 and 2 as there is not much room because of abs unit in the BMW for my td06 to sit. I made up a cad drawing of what I think would work well I'm not after massive power all be happy with 260 same power that was in my 32 I'm hoping full boost by 4200 18 psi. The design I'm looking at making will be the sr20 manifold reversed the turbo will sit up top allowing the gate to run underneath the mani so hiding from the unknown eye. Basically if I was to cut the flange off a stock manifold and turn it over that's ideal for me but to hard to controll being cast

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...