Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im upgrading the turbo next week on my R33 and was considering whilst i had the tubro out I may as well fit a better dump pipe and front pipe (to complement my cat back zaust). I picked up a s/s Blitz front pipe from Autobarn for $329...bargan i thought, and am considering buying a HKS dump pipe second hand......

But I have heard mixed opinions on wheather there worth there money or not for there gains. I've rang around variour tuners and imports dealers.....some say there great, improving flow & throttle response. Other say they do very little and that my money would be better spent on some other aspect of the car (non specific, just saying there not worth the $350).

so I put the question to the skylines Australia Forum readers......

are they worth the $$$?

what gains have others felt when installing one?

anyone had a dyno before an after having one fitted?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39048-hks-ss-dump-pipe-worth-the/
Share on other sites

Try dropping SLY33 a pm, he fitted one to his car, as his turbo was choking top end, he thought it was a good thing.

Ask yourself what impact turbulance in the dump pipe makes? would it increase back pressure or reduce it? Or would it make no difference? Also, does yours have the seperator block between the turbine outlet and dump? If so, what effect would that have?

Basic fact of turboed cars (in fact all cars) is that reduced back pressure will mean better flow, better flow will mean faster exhaust gasses, faster exhaust gasses will mean better cylinder scavenging and quicker spooling turbo.

I am not saying that Trust, HKS or any other brand make the perfect dump, but really, have a look at the brick wall the stock dump presents for the wastegate, it wouldnt be very hard to improve on.

And another thing with Jap second hand parts 99 chances out of 100, if you buy something second hand, its going to retain most of its value if you fit it and decide its no good.

If you have a stock turbo, IMHO the most gains you will receive are from the front pipe, but upgrade the turbo and its a different story.

does the HKS dump pipe hav a split pipe running the wastegate seperately? if so how far down the dump does it rejoin before the CAT, because i was under the impression that CES made the best split dump pipe for internal wastegate turbos due to the wastegate screamer having decent travel distance before it rejoins

The CES one is a full dump+front pipe in one, Since I alreadny bought a good front pipe it would be a bit of a waste of money to buy another one. I looks pretty good though, had i known of it sooner it would have been something to consider.

does anyone know if the HKS dump pipe has a split pipe running the wastegate seperately?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...