Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm looking at getting some Enkei RPF1s in SBC, going for a 18.85 +40 possibly for the front. Anyone know if this will fit okay or would I need to go closer to +30?

On 10/21/2018 at 8:55 PM, Gazzaa said:

Kinkstaah is right, the wheels will never fit but with stretched tyres you might be ok. You will need 235/30 for the front And likely 255/25 for the rear

i tried to get heroic and squeeze 275’s on the back but the passenger side has scrubbed away about 2mm of sidewall. With a +25 offset I’m gonn need to downsize to 265/35/18

I also adjusted the camber to negative 1.25 degrees

 

4013F0F8-AC65-4970-BE34-8C0FE330E414.jpeg

216E826C-BEC1-47A2-88D1-6435123DCAE0.jpeg

The wheels have 215/35 and 225/35 on them. I’m ok to roll fenders but if it’s gonna be sticking way too far out i’d rather not waste the money.

 

thanks for the advice guys. Maybe i’ll try and find 18x9.5 +22 and run staggered tires

7 minutes ago, kyl_er34 said:

If I were to go the 40, would it poke or something?

The higher the offset, the closer to the car. +40 will not fit as you will hit the suspension unless you are using a really skinny wheel. Try to stick between +25 and +35, width depending

11 hours ago, Ryno34 said:

The wheels have 215/35 and 225/35 on them. I’m ok to roll fenders but if it’s gonna be sticking way too far out i’d rather not waste the money.

 

thanks for the advice guys. Maybe i’ll try and find 18x9.5 +22 and run staggered tires

That doesn’t sound right for a 10.5. I’m not saying it’s impossible but the tyres would be completely stretched to their limits, plus with such a low sidewall, its not the correct fitment for a r34.

 

i have. 235/40 stretched over a 9.5 wheel up front

the 10.5 will 100% poke out but with a stretched 255/35 or 245/40 you might be in luck

it mostly comes down to ride height and your suspension set up 

 

this is how the 235/40 looks on the 9.5 (+20)

00045788-ED12-4CE7-9845-32227CC16CF9.jpeg

23 hours ago, Gazzaa said:

The higher the offset, the closer to the car. +40 will not fit as you will hit the suspension unless you are using a really skinny wheel. Try to stick between +25 and +35, width depending

 

13 hours ago, niZmO_Man said:

As mentioned above, higher positive number = closer to strut.

Nismo sizes: 8.5" +35, 9.5 +38

Okay well that rules out the +40s. So hard to find the right size in this colour I want. Would I be able to fit a 10/10.5 on the rear of a R34?

Your idea of 'fit' is different to others (and different to mine, which is also different to others)

10 +38 is a relatively common size at the rear of the R34.

With a square setup, the rear of the R34 pokes more than the front does, which was a surprise to me when I put on a square set of rims, or at least it did on my own car.


Like all things - What do you want to do with the car? This will determine what kind of fitment you really want. Talking 225 on 10's means I'm not the best person to advise as I am a more 265 at the front on a 9in rim kind of guy.

But making it fit is a question of maths and geometry really.

On 10/25/2018 at 8:35 AM, Kinkstaah said:

Your idea of 'fit' is different to others (and different to mine, which is also different to others)

10 +38 is a relatively common size at the rear of the R34.

With a square setup, the rear of the R34 pokes more than the front does, which was a surprise to me when I put on a square set of rims, or at least it did on my own car.


Like all things - What do you want to do with the car? This will determine what kind of fitment you really want. Talking 225 on 10's means I'm not the best person to advise as I am a more 265 at the front on a 9in rim kind of guy.

But making it fit is a question of maths and geometry really.

shit man, the coupe must be different to the sedan because im running 10.5 +25 on the rear and im about 7mm from touching the coilovers lol. +38 id have no chance.

 

i guess these things are best to just lie under the car with a tape measure

https://www.willtheyfit.com/index.php?width=265&aspect=35&diameter=18&wheelwidth=10&offset=38&width2=265&aspect2=35&wheel_size=18&wheel_width=10-5&offset2=25

 

According to this, it'd be 6.8mm closer to the suspension Strut. 

Note, did say 10 +38, not 10.5 +38. I had a 9.5 +27 on the back so I obviously had much more room on both sides.

On 10/24/2018 at 12:30 AM, Gazzaa said:

That doesn’t sound right for a 10.5. I’m not saying it’s impossible but the tyres would be completely stretched to their limits, plus with such a low sidewall, its not the correct fitment for a r34.

 

i have. 235/40 stretched over a 9.5 wheel up front

the 10.5 will 100% poke out but with a stretched 255/35 or 245/40 you might be in luck

it mostly comes down to ride height and your suspension set up 

 

this is how the 235/40 looks on the 9.5 (+20)

00045788-ED12-4CE7-9845-32227CC16CF9.jpeg

This is just my personal opinion but do not stretch your tires too much or else it makes the wheel look like hub caps. 

55 minutes ago, Robocop2310 said:

This is just my personal opinion but do not stretch your tires too much or else it makes the wheel look like hub caps.

As if that's the reason to not stretch like that!  How about driving on the sidewall?  Or loading the sidewall completely contrarily to how the engineer designed it to be loaded?  Or how about setting it up to be popped off the rim edge when you hit a rock?  Or completely defeating the point of rim protectors on the sidewall of the tyre?  Or ruining the dynamic performance of the tyre?

 

Edited by GTSBoy
7 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

As if that's the reason to not stretch like that!  How about driving on the sidewall?  Or loading the sidewall completely contrarily to how the engineer designed it to be loaded?  Or how about setting it up to be popped off the rim edge when you hit a rock?  Or completely defeating the point of rim protectors on the sidewall of the tyre?  Or ruining the dynamic performance of the tyre?

 

Well yes, and all that too! 

But my pet hate is “Stance nation” crazy camber. I just don’t get it.

16 hours ago, demiosdd said:

How about 18x9+40 245/40/18 all round 

The offset is too low for the front I believe.

Use the website willtheyfit and put in your current setup, get the measurements, grab a tape measure and see the difference for yourself.

1 hour ago, demiosdd said:

Yeah I don’t know the setup atm I want to run 18x9s all round if I can with out the wheel sticking out 

18x9 + 30 is what you’re after my friend

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • have no doubt and wanted too trust me and may regret later not necessarily worried about weight (would be 8 kg ish total) it was more the $$ to do it properly is about $6 - $7K in hardwear need long 310mm stroke jacks etc - plus install and call me whatever im not doing it myself even if wanted too cant weld etc  - thats $10K installed vs fraction of that cost while Ive spent some money on this POS I actually really dont like doing so unless its got a large chance to make me go faster 😁 hey in still carting this things around on a 15 yr old rusted open trailer so I can spend on racing not buy a new trailer to look better the manual jacks Ive had done are heavy and take space but are transportable and usable anywhere - taking or organizing even compressed air let alone nitrogen which is more whats needed coming from Perth to Winton or Sydney or the like honestly just adds to my brain headaches/ hurts of organisation also ha 15 mins job will get down to 2 - 5 min job vs 1 min job for airjacks - all tradeoffs I spose
    • Purely out of curiosity, how do you know all this @dbm7? Do you work with automatic gearboxes professionally? This goes way way way beyond "I've had an automatic Skyline once and did some mucking around"
    • I'll just reiterate that it's best to do all the wiring diagnostics, before even thinking about buying replacement solenoids ~ that is, be absolutely sure the solenoid is bad.....ie; bad connector(s), rodents chewed through a wire, etc etc. If you don't so this, you can fork out all the money for solenoids, only to find something else is wrong (this'll make you cry if you pull the valvebody only to find a broken wire is at fault... ...some more glue on the solenoid packs -- this is the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly.... ...these are all shift solenoids ~ ostensibly they're the same as the shift solenoids from the 4-speed auto.... ...this is the RE4R01A solenoid set... ...with these, you have 3 shift solenoids attached to the plate, and the separate solenoid is the EPC solenoid (line pressure control) -- with both designs, the TC lockup clutch solenoid (also PWM so they could slide the clutch shut), is located on the lower valvebody half.... ...(story time)...back in the 90's, it was a common fault that the EPC solenoid (or TC-lock solenoid) would fail, but Nissan only sold them as part of the assembly (think ~$350 at the time) ~ thing was, Isuzu also used these boxes in light commercials, and you could buy the PWM solenoid as a separate part, so it was possible to buy/use that solenoid (around $65), and make it fit (remove the circlip, fit to old plate and deal with wiring)...making it a more cost effective repair. I've not seen the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly, but with the 4-speed RE4R01A it was possible to hack/fit a single shift solenoid onto an other working set, using a donor solenoid from another set with failed EPC....(by rights the whole set should be replaced), but it ends up being a question of how much life is left in the box itself ; sometimes it's a viable repair to fix one solenoid, just to get another 100k of road miles out of it before it needs first overhaul...other times the box is that old/worn, you're as well doing first overhaul and replacing the solenoids and starting fresh... What Nissan did here with the 5-speed, was relocate the EPC solenoid to the lower valvebody (next to the TC lockup solenoid), and stuck the direct-drive clutch solenoid (for the extra gear) where the EPC solenoid used to be on the 4-speed....I can only imagine they did this for serviceability ; the PWM solenoids are most likely to fail, and it's a doddle to drop the pan and change these out (as opposed to dropping the valvebody itself to get at a top mounted EPC)... ...also keep in mind, that some BMW 3/5 series & Mazda (and maybe some Ford/Mazda rebadges, not sure), also used the RE5R01A box under a different name/part number...not saying parts availability is any better, but sometimes it helps to know this when it comes to NOS floating about in the EU.... HTH  
    • FWIW, air jacks are actually pretty light and simple to add, they are just 4 hydraulic cylinders (often at the main cage A and C pillar points) and an externally accessible airline  - they make quick work a breeze
    • Maximum Attack has entered the chat
×
×
  • Create New...