Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good find. Propably can't buy them anywhere ?.

What do you think of wedssport tc105x 18x9 +32 (255/40) all round? Too big in the front maybe?

Maybe an other size of these? http://wedssport.jp/products/english/spectable/tc105x.pdf

15 hours ago, Kinkstaah said:

265's can fit. I have them all round on an 18x9 +30.

They will pretty much only fit in that space. I also had them in the past with 18x9.5 +27 (because the tyre was mounted in the same spot, centrally speaking).

Mind you, you will want to roll guards, make sure your liners are absolutely clipped in, and potentially relocate the driver side loom under the right/driver side front quarter panel, because you can/will rub through it if your springs aren't ultra rock hard.

image.png.c354424278f78607a6a3b0f421208c87.png

 

image.png.a02402d06641a588cafc0aac6f12f95c.png

Will your life be a hell of a lot easier with a 8.5in rim and a 255? Yes.

 

Was moving the loom simply a matter of tying it up higher? Or did you have to disconnect/ re feed it to the outside of the chassis like in your pic

9 hours ago, r34.bryan said:

Good find. Propably can't buy them anywhere ?.

What do you think of wedssport tc105x 18x9 +32 (255/40) all round? Too big in the front maybe?

Maybe an other size of these? http://wedssport.jp/products/english/spectable/tc105x.pdf

Alright so after reading this entire tread again and comparing a lot of setups on willtheyfit.com I think I found the right setup, if not please tell me.

car: r34 gtt w/ stock fenders

front: 18x9 +32 with 255/40 tyres

rear: 18x9.5 +35 with 265/35 tyres

After comparing so many setups I'm pretty sure the rear will fit. But I'm not 100% sure about the fronts. Is is better to run 18x8.5 + 32?

Or will the 9j +32 in the front fit?

Can anyone confirm this? also do I need to roll fenders?

Thanks!

1 hour ago, Gazzaa said:

Was moving the loom simply a matter of tying it up higher? Or did you have to disconnect/ re feed it to the outside of the chassis like in your pic

We actually had to uh... mould the lip a bit with a hammer and cut a section out/fold it out of the way. There isn't *quite* enough slack in the wires to move the loom onto of it unlike a S chassis where you can.

Luckily you don't need to cut wires. When you see it in front of you its fairly easy to see which pars of the lip need some attention to get it to go over the top, but it can (and should) be done.

re: Above wheels, 18x9 +32 will fit fine on the front, with a 255. With a 265 you will be real (REAL) close to touching the upright arm with  the outer edge of your tyre.


HOWEVER a 255/40 is a larger rolling diameter than a 265/35. Beware of your loom ?

  • 1 month later...

Hi all. Looking for some help for picking new wheels for my 34 gtt. Come with some god awful ROH Mantis wheels I need to bin ASAP.

Looking at 18x8.5 +30 Fronts, 18x8.5 +35 Rears.

Car is lowered on coil overs, no guard roll. Will this be a good fitment? After a very slight poke if possible. Looking for semi-aggressive fit without drawing to much attention from the po po. Don't want to roll guards and have to worry about scrubbing. Which the stupid 19's I have now are like.

Prob go 235's front and 265's rear if that fits. Would prefer 255's rear but its uncommon size.

Lol Ryno. Nice looking 34. The wider rears will def look good when you get em on. Share another pic when you get there.

Just realised I typed in my post. I'm looking at 18x9.5 +35 rears. Let me know how you go with yours.

I'm trying to get a tiny bit of poke with a small stretch to the tyre look. But I do not want to roll guards or go aggressive camber.

A ROTA Wheel salesman suggested 9.5 +20 all round. Not too keen on that.

I spent hours scrolling through the other thread but there really isnt a heck alot in there for 34's. I guess what I'm really looking for are the maximum and minimum offsets for the 3 widths I'm considering. 8.5 on fronts, 9.5 or 10 on rear.

  • 3 weeks later...
On 09/04/2020 at 10:49 AM, r34.bryan said:

Thank you!

9j +32 on the front it is. If I put a 255/40 on it would I have any issues with clearance or rubbing? I want to keep the fenders stock without rolling them. Would a 245/40 be safer?

235/40 or 245/40 is best for an 18x9 up front. +32 offset will sit well.

once you move up to a 255 tyre you are meant to drop to a 35 profile. I found 255/35 to be a good size for the rear but if you can fit wider then go for gold. Fatter tyre at the back always looks good 

On 22/05/2020 at 5:22 PM, KillmeImhere said:

Lol Ryno. Nice looking 34. The wider rears will def look good when you get em on. Share another pic when you get there.

Just realised I typed in my post. I'm looking at 18x9.5 +35 rears. Let me know how you go with yours.

I'm trying to get a tiny bit of poke with a small stretch to the tyre look. But I do not want to roll guards or go aggressive camber.

A ROTA Wheel salesman suggested 9.5 +20 all round. Not too keen on that.

I spent hours scrolling through the other thread but there really isnt a heck alot in there for 34's. I guess what I'm really looking for are the maximum and minimum offsets for the 3 widths I'm considering. 8.5 on fronts, 9.5 or 10 on rear.

18x9.5+20 is a common size but fitment all depends on your suspension.

i had it fit well on my 34 sedan With rolled guards but a few pages back - someone else said it was too pokey.

If you want to keep factory guards unrolled then I recommend 8.5 up front and 9.5 rear, somewhere around the +25 or +30 offset region

39DE6034-1C9E-4DCA-A222-E90917B43561.jpeg

72006355-2BC2-41FC-AC45-56C019FBC3CA.jpeg

On 6/12/2020 at 5:02 PM, Gazzaa said:

235/40 or 245/40 is best for an 18x9 up front. +32 offset will sit well.

once you move up to a 255 tyre you are meant to drop to a 35 profile. I found 255/35 to be a good size for the rear but if you can fit wider then go for gold. Fatter tyre at the back always looks good 

Thanks! in the meanwhile I found another set of rims, which come in different offset.

I think I wil go for this setup:

car: r34 gtt coupe w/ stock fenders

front: 18x9 +35 with 245/40 tyres

rear: 18x9.5 +35 with 265/35 tyres

The car is stock atm but I will lower it a bit with coilovers before I change the wheel & tyre setup.

This setup will probably fit right?

  • 2 weeks later...

I had Work Emotion T7Rs fitted yesterday and am stoked with the results.

- Nismo/Bilstein factory suspension

- stock guards with no intention of rolling them

Front: 18x8.5 +30 (wheel weight 10.01kg if you're interested), 235/40/18 BS-007A

Rear: 18x9.5 +38 (10.13kg), 255/30/18 BS-007A
 
I haven't been for a spirited drive yet, but no detectable scrubbing at all so far.

 

image.thumb.png.869585865b0ab1081e9bd24ffd6b8298.png

 

image.png.58f7ecfacac57207a6bac36c9676aa2f.png

 

image.png.b24fbb1207856e4267e7bb1085f265ee.png

 

image.png.d50a8eda74d67a827a82db017e8a0580.png

 

image.png.488bc5c51e6ac5cc1b5a449526222ed7.png

 

image.png.d6b7414e9d4a70be00f39c6c5828ab05.png

 

image.png.0964006f0e72de6d483d26409bfa15c5.png

 

image.png.05b781e9bbe197d2e2036337f4fbad50.png

  • Like 1
On 15/06/2020 at 5:18 PM, r34.bryan said:

Thanks! in the meanwhile I found another set of rims, which come in different offset.

I think I wil go for this setup:

car: r34 gtt coupe w/ stock fenders

front: 18x9 +35 with 245/40 tyres

rear: 18x9.5 +35 with 265/35 tyres

The car is stock atm but I will lower it a bit with coilovers before I change the wheel & tyre setup.

This setup will probably fit right?

Should be sweet, only one way to find out ?

9 hours ago, ob1 said:

I had Work Emotion T7Rs fitted yesterday and am stoked with the results.

- Nismo/Bilstein factory suspension

- stock guards with no intention of rolling them

Front: 18x8.5 +30 (wheel weight 10.01kg if you're interested), 235/40/18 BS-007A

Rear: 18x9.5 +38 (10.13kg), 255/30/18 BS-007A
 
I haven't been for a spirited drive yet, but no detectable scrubbing at all so far.

 

image.thumb.png.869585865b0ab1081e9bd24ffd6b8298.png

 

image.png.58f7ecfacac57207a6bac36c9676aa2f.png

 

image.png.b24fbb1207856e4267e7bb1085f265ee.png

 

image.png.d50a8eda74d67a827a82db017e8a0580.png

 

image.png.488bc5c51e6ac5cc1b5a449526222ed7.png

 

image.png.d6b7414e9d4a70be00f39c6c5828ab05.png

 

image.png.0964006f0e72de6d483d26409bfa15c5.png

 

image.png.05b781e9bbe197d2e2036337f4fbad50.png

of course there’s not gonna be any scrubbing issues when you’re riding around town at 4x4 height ?

12 hours ago, Gazzaa said:

Should be sweet, only one way to find out ?

of course there’s not gonna be any scrubbing issues when you’re riding around town at 4x4 height ?

Hello Ob1,

Those work wheels look great on your 34. Bronze really pops against your blue. Nice choice. Thank you very much for sharing.

Is your 2nd to last picture showing clearance between suspension and wheel/rim on the rear I take it? If so, thank you everso. Makes me comfortable about my wheel choice for the rear. 18x9.5 +35. I think 3mm closer will be fine. Looks like there is def room.

I really wanted those same wheels but they don't seem to come in the colour I'm hunting for, gloss black. I'd settle for matt black but the pictures I've been looking at look more grey to me.

44 minutes ago, KillmeImhere said:

 

Is your 2nd to last picture showing clearance between suspension and wheel/rim on the rear I take it? If so, thank you everso. Makes me comfortable about my wheel choice for the rear. 18x9.5 +35. I think 3mm closer will be fine. Looks like there is def room.

 

yeah the second last pic is the rear...but with +35 you're going away from the strut by 3mm, not towards.

You will be good @KillmeImhere

 

@ob1 I compared your front setup to mine on willtheyfit.com and it says my rim will be 11.4mm closer to the strut.

Do you reckon you still have that space left in the front?

If i go for a 8.5 instead of 9 in the front my rim will be 5mm closer to the strut compared to yours.

That will probably fit, But i'd rather have the 9's for the more aggressive look.

Edited by r34.bryan
On 28/06/2020 at 8:24 PM, r34.bryan said:

You will be good @KillmeImhere

 

@ob1 I compared your front setup to mine on willtheyfit.com and it says my rim will be 11.4mm closer to the strut.

Do you reckon you still have that space left in the front?

 

I am not an expert wheel fitter, but it looks like you'll have no worries.  I measure about 21mm gap from rim to that suspension arm.

 

image.png.b643f7def089c5d7b9cd131197e879c4.png

 

image.png.b78baed6e7d59ee6fe072efb44d43353.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...