Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Bikes do need strength to be ridden but not as much as you think. Like Birds said Casey is 58Kgs and exactly the same height as me. I discussed fitness with Alex Craville (MotoGP World Champ). He did and does a lot of running as well as weights.

Previously I have said:

I will definitely look at adding weights and increasing everything once I'm sure I'm improving fatigue wise. My tests showed that my muscles were breaking down faster than they were building (partly due to low testosterone), hence hitting the weights too soon will just be counter productive.

If I weight train too often or too hard with CFS I pass out.

That girl started off 15Kgs lighter than me and ended up 5Kgs heavier than my target. She also seemed to be bordering on diet obsession at the beginning where as my diet is relatively healthy. I initially had cravings which have subsided in the past two weeks.

I feel great when I run, she felt shit. She wants to lift weights, I want to ride bikes. Bike riders run.

GTST If you still think I should be lifting weights right now then don't even bother replying. Being unconscious is not my aim.

Edited by JEPPE
  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Birds, shut up and lift

Was gonna say the same about the motogp riders though, they all look like malnourished 10 year olds and can't even pick the bike up off the ground on their own

If you think lifting is the solution to my tl;dr habit, you're deadlift wrong.

Was gonna say the same about the motogp riders though, they all look like malnourished 10 year olds and can't even pick the bike up off the ground on their own

Indeed, most of them are tiny. Dany Pedrosa is 158 cm and 47Kgs!!! All about stamina and knowing the pressure points of your bike :) braaap!

Rossi, pretty lean:

tumblr_lwqtlgp6mj1qbrq7fo1_400.jpg

On a serious note though, one reason why it's good for a novice to do weights whilst they're trying to lose fat is that if they have no muscle they will have no shape once they've lost the fat and just look flat, kinda like the photo above. Muscle has shape, fat doesn't. Not saying you need to hit beefcake level 9000, just a good routine of medicore weights hitting a lot of different angles will go a long way to having a nice shape when you lean down. Running is great for the heart and endurance factor, if you love it keep doing it.

^^This is basically what JEPPE is doing with the resistance training. After she has dropped the kg she will be left with some nice shape and a body hopefully ready to hit the weights for more core strength.

On a side note, I think that skinny or flat people who bulk up almost always end up looking better than those who build muscle whilst fat and cut down later. I've seen many a before and after pic and this is just my opinion. You have rare circumstances where a fat person has been able to bulk up and cut down a ridiculous amount, but on the whole there is some fat that is damn hard to get rid of and this is made even harder when you're trying to feed a large body of muscles at the same time. Range of motion and technique is generally better without the fat too.

beefcake level 9000

:rofl:

Yep, definitely agree that even a small amount of muscle looks far better.

It's awesome that you can work certain areas to build them up. Someone with even a small amount of fat doesn't get to choose where it goes, I know plenty of thin chicks with unflattering body shapes.

  • 2 months later...

It's been a while!

In a nut shell:

Was going well with exercise routine and 'kicking goals' although it was gradually tiring me out. Started job which meant I had to cease exercise as fatigue was massive, cannot do both, only one or the other. Fortunately at my work I walk 15-25km a day about 3-4 days a week so I am still getting a bit off exercise.

A few weeks ago my horse fell on me and almost crushed my pelvis. Fortunately it only came to 'almost' and also did not trample me but I was out of action for two weeks. Have since been back at work for a couple of weeks.

Due to the fact I have been unable to exercise I decided to move my focus to my diet. I tried Light and Easy for a week which I must say was very effective mentally although a little costly so I have taken its structure and developed my own at a lower cost. I've been logging it since January and it has been quite consistent and feels as if I'm not changing anything which is a bonus. I'm just concentrating on ordering entrées instead of mains, not snacking so much, filling my day with activities instead of eating because I'm bored, and trying like crazy not to finish the plate if I'm not hungry. Hard habit to break!

Here's the chart from Jan 12th :

576411_10151553548770008_556690007_23836563_1201536875_n.jpg

4 more Kg's to lose then I will decide where I want to be and put some back on if I need.

Also in other news. Looks as though CFS may not be the only thing causing my issues. Could be something hormonal which may have been mentioned before but have only been able to rule out CFS for everything since I have now been on supplements for a while and haven't fully improved.

Will get more blood tests to check fatigue levels (iron etc) and have an appointment with an exercise specialist in a couple of weeks. Will report back if anything interesting is found!

Oh look who comes back to the party. Where ya been?! :P

That's a really impressive effort I must say, congratulations so far! Keep up the good work!

Bit of a personal question and I certainly don't expect you to answer it, but since you've mentioned it might be hormonal - are you on any contraceptive currently, particularly Implanon? I'm sure you've already taken this into consideration already though...neither you nor Adam strike me as remotely uneducated :)

Thanks man, it's good to see a difference when you look in the mirror. Will probably post some more pics soon as am halfway.

Only on the pill which I actually started taking when I wasn't seeing anyone for the sake of levelling my moods and improving my skin. It seemed to work a little on the moods, but still not enough.

Fair call. Was curious because while I know correlation does not equal cause, my (ex) GF went from 58kg to 64kg very quickly when she got the Implanon thingywatsit. Diet didn't change much - if anything got healthier coz she had to eat what I provided lol, and she was doing more exercise given free access to gym at her work. She's back down to 60kg now that she's got it removed, though since having f**ked the relationship with me and going her own way, her eating habits have gone to shit rofl.

Interesting Troy! I may check with my GP when they first prescribed it to me because I think it was around that time... Unless I'm judging a year different which happens. Thanks!

GTST, I pick and pack books in a warehouse. Pay's awesome and is casual so I can take off time to ride whenever I want :)

  • 1 month later...

Quick update, just got back from a month overseas and have dropped 2Kgs :D back to my normal 62, now anything more is a bonus. Was pretty chuffed when I stepped on the scales. Am keen to see what 58 feels like, if I don't make an effort it might take 6-9 months, if I do maybe 3 months... Appetite fluctuates so will see.

Still not exercising, currently checking blood sugar levels to see if I have diabetes. This build is going to take foreveeerrrrrrrr.

  • 2 weeks later...

Scrap that, was 61Kgs the next day and have stayed at 61 +/- .5 Kg since. Lighter than I've ever been in my full grown life. Only 3 more Kgs to go although from this small variation on weight day to day it seems as though I may have plateaued. Replaced last nights dinner with a 95gm tin of tuna. I hate tuna but it seems like the best option and kept me full for the night. Now I just need to avoid going out for dinner. Ever. Will see after a week if it helps!

Will take some more photos this week and post to compare. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...