Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  On 09/02/2012 at 1:10 PM, Roy said:

Actually the worst thing about Nissan coming back to local tin top racing is having to read a whole new wave of muppet posts about how the GTR was banned :domokun:

And the other wave of super mupets that actually think the GTR is the best race car ever to grace the earth when in reality they are a terrible platform to start with compared to other vehicles available!

Faster in corners comments are just made by people with blind folds on.

Over weight, front heavy, dated technology, terrible geometry, expensive to run blah blah.

We are all enthusiasts but the fan boys who have never actually owned a real race spec GTR shit me to tears.

The deal with Kelly racing was not put together overnight. It was well known that there was discussions taking place.

One team ive had some dealings with recently buying parts from will also be following KR's lead and taking on a new manufacturer come the COFT too.

  • Replies 245
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  On 09/02/2012 at 1:10 PM, Roy said:

Actually the worst thing about Nissan coming back to local tin top racing is having to read a whole new wave of muppet posts about how the GTR was banned :domokun:

this made me LOL.... hard

  On 10/02/2012 at 12:08 AM, hrd-hr30 said:

F1's only control parts are the tyres and the plank under the floor??? I wouldn't call that "alot of control tech". There is a massive difference to having design limitations or a framework to work within and having 'control' parts.

yeah i worded it poorly.

  On 10/02/2012 at 4:48 AM, benm said:

The AussieRacingCars has the best "racing" by a country mile. Its like watching a 4 wheeled version of the 125cc's!! Constantly 4 wide and lead changes every lap!

:)

more like 4 wheeled motoGP (since they run a 1.2L motor)

  On 10/02/2012 at 7:39 AM, MBS206 said:

Exciting racing has to be the V8Brute utes.

Find a gap that's 90% the width of your car and use it to overtake...

Come out the otherside to find your car is 10% narrower...

i think you mean a gap that's 10% the width of the car and then finding they are missing 90% of their car

  On 10/02/2012 at 11:43 AM, Risking said:

And the other wave of super mupets that actually think the GTR is the best race car ever to grace the earth when in reality they are a terrible platform to start with compared to other vehicles available!

Faster in corners comments are just made by people with blind folds on.

Over weight, front heavy, dated technology, terrible geometry, expensive to run blah blah.

We are all enthusiasts but the fan boys who have never actually owned a real race spec GTR shit me to tears.

The deal with Kelly racing was not put together overnight. It was well known that there was discussions taking place.

One team ive had some dealings with recently buying parts from will also be following KR's lead and taking on a new manufacturer come the COFT too.

i once saw a r34 GTR in the GT production series (quite a few years ago now, probably nearly 10 years). so this was a pretty much stock car (as per the rules) and in it's class was a few ferraris, 911's (nissan's claimed rival of the GTR) and a few others. from memory the GTR had a somewhat experienced driver. so how did it go? well it got smashed by pretty much everything in it's class and was back mixing with cars from the class below.

  On 11/02/2012 at 11:10 AM, Jetwreck said:

I wonder if we can get one of the Kelly bro's on the first win to say "were back....you pack of arseholes!"

Lolz

That would be an epic win of immeasurable proportions!

I doubt the Kelly bro's will get the first win. But one of their customer cars probably will.

I remember that silver r33 in gtp. It spent most of its time in the wall.

  On 10/02/2012 at 12:01 PM, mad082 said:

i think you mean a gap that's 10% the width of the car and then finding they are missing 90% of their car

How else do you expect to go 3 wide of the top of the Mountain?

yeah, Procar put the old R33 GTR in with the current model exotics/supercars (Lambo, Ferrari, Porsche etc) in Nation's Cup rather than with the other production cars (WRX, Evo, HSV, RX7, 200SX, and that insanely fast Mustang Bowe drove!) in GT Production. What do you expect? At least it saved the embarrasment of being beaten by Evos...

  On 12/02/2012 at 10:20 PM, NISMO said:

Given they're backed by NISMO, who do have a bit of experience with 8's and RWD, whats the view on how they'll go?

Most of the teams are going to be in the same boat with development/setup........Aero will be sorted before the car ever hits the circuit............so the only issue may be the motor. Of which they may have a short struggle with as I am guessing they will go OHC rather that OHV.

Personally going off there current V8 stats I think they will kick arse.......I may be a little bias though.

  On 13/02/2012 at 12:15 AM, Jetwreck said:

Most of the teams are going to be in the same boat with development/setup........Aero will be sorted before the car ever hits the circuit............so the only issue may be the motor. Of which they may have a short struggle with as I am guessing they will go OHC rather that OHV.

Personally going off there current V8 stats I think they will kick arse.......I may be a little bias though.

Going off their current stats they will struggle to win anything unless it is raining. Then have a cry about it. Then take their drivers to court. Then cry some more.

The thing that shits me about it (other than the "we was banned" fan boys) are people who choose to beleive that the engineers who work on the current cars are anything but world class. Just because the rules are limited doesnt mean the work they do is not excellent.

But anyway - good on Nissan for having a go. Hope they alienate fewer people than last time - because last time was a PR disaster.

John Teulan is the name of the guy that owned and drove the silver 33 GT-R in the old Nations Cup - later replaced by Aust GT. Teulan's 33 GT-R was always going to struggle against vastly more powerful and newer exotics... and Teulan himself, not exactly the sharpest driver in the field (don't think he won anything in over a decade of trying).

  On 10/02/2012 at 4:48 AM, benm said:

The AussieRacingCars has the best "racing" by a country mile. Its like watching a 4 wheeled version of the 125cc's!! Constantly 4 wide and lead changes every lap!

:)

Aussie Racing is awesome. Very cool little cars, and seeing them 4 wide around most corners is too good.

I was racing against one at PI yesterday in the WRX, quick through the corners.

  On 13/02/2012 at 1:00 AM, djr81 said:

Going off their current stats they will struggle to win anything unless it is raining. Then have a cry about it. Then take their drivers to court. Then cry some more.

I may have misinterepted your comments but if not I'd suggest you go and look at the 32 GT-R race results during its time in the early 90's ATCC... I think you'll find that Nissan did more than win in the rain!

In the 1991 ATCC (predecessor to V8 series) the GT-R won 7 out of the 9 rounds in the championship, and rain was rarely a factor. This is just one example. Do some research.

  On 13/02/2012 at 1:00 AM, djr81 said:

...are people who choose to beleive that the engineers who work on the current cars are anything but world class. Just because the rules are limited doesnt mean the work they do is not excellent.

Agree, trying to find gains when everything is so controlled is a difficult task. :thumbsup:

  On 13/02/2012 at 1:38 AM, whatsisname said:

I may have misinterepted your comments

Yes you did.

He said CURRENT results not shit from the late 80s and early 90s, huge difference.

  On 13/02/2012 at 1:47 AM, ActionDan said:

Yes you did.

He said CURRENT results not shit from the late 80s and early 90s, huge difference.

It's a bit hard for Nissan to have current results in the premier class of touring car racing in Australia, the last time they were involved was 1992! He also referenced Nissan only winning in the rain, which sounds like the infamous 1992 Bathurst race.

As for the 'banned' comments, the facts remain that from the beginning of the 1993 ATCC season turbocharged cars were no longer permitted resulting in the banning of both the GT-R and Ford Sierra.

*facepalm*

He's talking about Nissan's current involvement in racing in general, obviously not V8SCs...

Contrary to popular belief there are countries other than Australia that partake in Motorsport... even using V8s, no kidding!

As for the rain my guess would be he means SuperGT.

Time for the man himself to clarify as I need to get out of my pissy pants.

Edited by ActionDan
  On 13/02/2012 at 2:01 AM, whatsisname said:

It's a bit hard for Nissan to have current results in the premier class of touring car racing in Australia, the last time they were involved was 1992!

I was actually talking about the Kelly families current results, not Nissans.

The only time the Kelly's were om the ball last year was when it has been wet.

For what it is worth I watched the group A touring car races back in the day. They werent a patch on the rpesent day races for depth of field, quality of racing and professionalism.

Edited by djr81

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this is an old thread but I have a particular attachment to the ENR34, so I don't think additional content hurts. For starters, I agree with everyone here in that the performance of a stock R34 GTR is a pretty low bar and one that you're going to spend a lot of money "matching". Now if you're willing to deviate from that template as your goal, you'll be much better off and enjoy the car much more. The engine in the NA R34s is a real kick in the nuts in terms of upgradability compared to previous generation NA cars. The NA heads on the RB2X NEOs have MUCH smaller intake port cross sections and are not compatible with any of the aftermarket forward-facing manifolds available for the RB25DET. This can be remedied with a RB25DET NEO head, but those are expensive relative to what they are. A full long-block from a turbo AWD Stagea is generally a better value and will run you about $4000 USD to get it to you. This will get you the stronger RB26DETT rods, as well. That would give you a base to build off of to be safe in the 400whp range. Not shooting for the moon, but if the stock R34 was your bar, this engine would buy you enough to be just North of stock GTR power. A forward facing manifold would allow for the easiest method toward using Bosch EV14 format injectors such as those from Injector Dynamics and FIC, to name a couple. People hate them because they're copies, but Greddy fakes can be had for around $300 USD. With what the fuel rail, regulator, injectors, and the rail adds, figure $2000 USD for the whole setup including the manifold. With the OEM brackets and a bit of trimming to the ends of the lower frame rails, the OEM intercooler mounting brackets can be used to mount an OEM GTR intercooler, or an aftermarket one made for a GTR. Those are handy vs a universale due to the angles that the end tanks have on them. Then your plumbing become super straightforward at that point despite having to cut a hole where the battery is an a matching one on the other side for the pipes. Battery can go to the trunk. I'd round up to a healthy $2000 USD here too (maybe even a tiny more) to allow for a nice aftermarket unit and some pipe fabrication. Or if you can find someone that's upgrading to something larger, the used market comes in clutch here for a decent savings. I won't even get into turbo sizing as that's something that would be for yourself to determine. HOWEVER, for the purposes of your stated goals, a Borg Warner 7064 with an internal wastegate would be a perfect spooler and would make stock GTR power easily. It would also bolt up to your OEM manifold (that would come with the DET you purchased a couple steps above) if it were ordered with a T3 flange. More with adequate fuel. If you can stick with the OEM exhaust manifold then expect to be in the whole about $6000 USD for decent turbo like the one suggested, a down pipe, new O2, and full exhaust to mate up, and upgrades to the integrated BOV in an EFR or a standalone BOV for a different turbo, as well as an aftermarket IWG (internal waste gate). Those last two are definitely optional and unnecessary. All of this stuff above does you no good without any way of tuning and or monitoring the engine. Bite the bullet on a standalone engine management solution. If your experience with wiring is limited, you're going to have to hand it off to someone else, though. Unfortunately, the adapter/patch harnesses available are typically made around the GTT which does not include AWD, and the GTR, which integrates into a lot of chassis features that aren't present in your wiring interface. So the ENR34 is the oddball. So you'll want to expand a bit on your selection and find an ECU that's capable of running the ATTESA pump also. I have a Link Thunder, but you don't need quite that much ECU to accommodate that. You WILL need someone with the know-how to tune it and code those features into whatever software it uses. And to wire it up. This will be your most significant expense. Call it $6000 USD with an ECU, an okay wiring job (no motorsport grade at this price), aftermarket triggers and R35 coils, and the time it takes to tune the ECU with added features (electronic boost control solenoid, MAP, IAT, the new triggers, and ATTESA) and don't be surprised if it's more if you want better work done. Grab a clutch made for any RB pull transmission R32/R33GTR made for the power handling capacity you're looking for. Budget $1500 USD for a new good one. That's about $20,000 USD for an engine you've upgraded yourself and had wired and tuned by someone else. That's no brakes (ENR34 brakes are pathetic), suspension (again, pathetic), or wheels and tires. So you're pretty spot on in terms of spending $30,000 USD extra on the car just to get it to perform a little better than a stock R34 GTR while looking like a bone stock ENR34 with some wheels and suspension mods. That doesn't include fluids, maintenance items, gaskets/seals, repairs needed or anything else discovered along the way. But you'll have a car you can take to the track and have fun without worrying as much about nicks and dings.  
    • Okay so, please read this. car started and ran fine. got my tuned ecu by RSenthalpy, did a bunch of pulls to test it out and finally drive the car after half a year of it just sitting and idling at most. Everything was good, thing ran flawlessly and had so much power, didn't feel slower than a Prius anymore. Parked it back and turned it off.  Next day, I install an AFR and start the car. Didn't wire anything to the ecu. Just gauge.  Car started, but died out in about a minute. I figured it was cause my car was on a lift and the fuel was really low and old. I add 5 gallons of fuel, still cranks but no start. I remove all AFR wiring (tapped into double din acc and power wires but there was a nest of wiring there so I was worried I messed something up. tried to put it back to how it was prior to afr install.) Still cranks no start. Changed spark plugs with brand new ones Changed fuel pump with a new one (verified working) Did compression test , compression came back all at 150ish. All fuses are good, Relay seemed good but ill double check by switching similar relays around. Verified MAF is working - Ended up getting curious as to why fuel pump is not priming when ignition is on, so I cut the fuel pump ground and power and connected them directly to a portable jumper. I also disconnected fuel line to fuel rail to verify fuel is being sent. So with direct jumper power, the fuel pump turns on and shot gas everywhere through the fuel pipe that I had disconnected, so ny doing that, I verified no clogs in fuel lines or filter. - Tried starting the car with that jumper directly wired to power and ground, but car still did not start. I'm guessing its a CAS issue but im a little scared to check it without messing up timing or anything else since I actually dont understand how to check CAS lol. If anyone has any other suggestions or recommendations , please let me know.
    • Hi all. I am aware there is lots of discussions about jacking points, where to lift the car and what not. But as usual just a lot of "in my opinion" and nothing definitive, and everyone does it in a different way. I want to hear from some experienced people on which points on the car it's okay/safe/recommended to lift the car using a four point hoist/lift. I will attach some images of my underbody. Sills are largely okayish, the driver side jacking point is pretty mangled though and it looks like the underfloor is slightly pushed in too, but I might be wrong. In the German Skyline forum, the consensus is to use the sidemember chassis rails in the front and the rear subframe? bushing in the rear. I know the manual says to never use the sidemember for loading but lots of folk do it and it was definitely done on my car too as they are slightly bent too. Based on the images, what points do I use to not make the already present damage worse? I'd use wood or rubber blocks to spread the load across a bigger area of course. Driver side sidemember and jacking point mangled one) https://imgur.com/a/eKjzrJX Driver side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/W3DWF1P Passenger side sidemember and jacking point https://imgur.com/a/65UvIJe Passenger side rear jacking point https://imgur.com/a/h3k7j53 We can also see some underbody rust but so far it all looks somewhat treatable and nothing that requires a Yoshida style restoration.
    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...