Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a 2 way, but the understeer actually reduced when I fitted it - probably because I could push harder through the corners under acceleration.

The thing is the understeer is occuring under constant speed cornering, not if trail braking (must admit, I try and avoid trail braking:))- and when I power on, it goes away as well. I could understand it if it was only under accel or decel.

Ahh cool,

In that case I'd say the tyres. Constant speed corners should (I think) have the car balanced, but of course as your cornering you'll wipe off a little bit of speed (due to the change of direction) which would push the weight bias forward, working your front tyres harder.

Anyway, enough of my ramblings..

J

Steve,

I got my kg/mm to lbs conversion all wrong. Your right 8k (450lbs) is not massive and is certainly what I would use on the front end of the skyline on the road. What I said before may still ring true in this case. Your spring rate, front to rear is significantly different. The front springs (even with the extra weight of the front end) will stop compressing, causing the front tyres to slip before the rear end. 3K (170lbs) is pretty soft and creates a large ratio difference between front to rear. Id also be surprised if that 2 way locker LSD isn’t causing some turn in understeer. Like a welded rear diff, turn in is traditionally shocking.

ADM

Steve, I agree with the other guys on this one mate - I'd say a large part of your understeer issue is due to the differing grip levels of the Revspecs and RE540S's.

I also agree wholeheartedly with Pete (Fatz)... when the 540's do let go, they go BIG TIME!

Hi Steve, I would do 2 things and 2 only, until you thoroughly test the results.

1. Same tyre compound all round, you have rear tyres that are capable of 3 seconds per lap faster times at Mallalla than your front tyres. Even them up and you can then make a sensible decision.

2. Remove the rear HICAS, as you know we have NO Skylines with the HICAS still on them. A computer is deciding the rear toe angles for you, this is never a good thing.

When you have done those 2 things, then test it. At the same time you need to check for bottoming out, mid corner understeer is typical symptom of the lack of front suspension travel. Put a cable tie tight around the shock shaft, so that when the shock compresses, it moves the cable tie to the lowest point. Then you see how much it travels, measure the distance and make sure it is not hitting the bump stops too hard. If it is, then raise the ride height and see if that makes any difference.

If you still have mid corner understeer then soften up the front bar all the way. If you still have mid corner understeer then I would recheck the front spring rate. As you know I never run more than 450 lbs in a 2wd Skyline, which is the same as you have. With the 27 mm front bar on full hard, it lifts the inside front wheel off the ground. I can feel it, so I back the front bar off a bit to keep it on the ground, then adjust the rear bar to balance the handling. You simply can't get less body roll than that, you need the tyres in contact with the track as much as you can.

Lastly I assume you are running the 24 mm adjustable rear bar, there are some 22 mm ones out there, but we only use them on GTR's.

Hope that helps

Ooops I nearly forgot, I have to check in the box, but I don't think we have a rear spring rate lower than 190 lbs for the circuit race cars. I used 150 lbs on the drag GTST that I did, it worked a charm for that purpose. Maybe the 170 lbs is a little light, but 20 lbs (up to 190 lbs) is really fine tuning. If you can borrow a set of 200 lb springs and try them, it may be worthwhile. On high speed circuits, like Philip Island, we run up to 250 lbs, but it is one smooth track.

I may be able to find a set around 200 lbs for you to try, what dimensions are your springs? Top and bottom ID and free height, we use 90/75/250. They are ground flat both top and bottom. Let me know.

Hi Guys, tyres sizes vary lots. A quick example, we use Yokohama A032R's and there are 2 sizes that work OK for us on 8" rims, 235/40/17 and 245/45/17. Now from the sizes you would say the 245/45/17's should be 245 mm wide, but they are 242 mm wide, (-3mm or 1.2%) so not too much difference. The 235/40/17's are 239 mm wide, (+4mm or 1.7%) again not too much difference. But what looks like a 10 mm difference in width on paper is in reality only 3mm and that is from the same tyre manufacturer and the same tyre type.

The Yokohama A032R's have quite rounded shoulders, typical for an "R" type tyre. I recently tried a set of Hankooks that were labelled 245/40/17 and they measured 254 mm because of the square shoulders (+9mm or 4%). So if I compare them to the 245/45/17 A032R's there is a 13 mm difference between 2 supposedly "245" tyres.

Bottom line, tyre sizes are really only "indicators" the tolerances seem quite large at up to 4%. If the widths are this varied, makes you wonder what the real world circumference differences are as that affects speedo accuracy.

Interesting.

How did you find the hankooks?  Any chance of a review?

cheers

Sorry I can't, there is a secrecy agreement on that contract. They are not available for sale yet anyway. When they are, I think the contract releases me and I can then comment.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep super expensive, awesome. It would be a cool passion project if I had the money.
    • Getting the setup right, is likely to cost multiples of the purchase price of the vehicle.
    • So it's a ginormous undertaking that will be a massive headache but will be sorta cool if pulled off right. And also expensive. I'm sure it'll be as expensive as buying the car itself. I don't think you could just do this build without upgrading other things to take the extra power. Probably lots of custom stuff as well. All this assuming the person has mechanical knowledge. I'm stupid enough to try it but smart enough to realize there's gonna be mistakes even with an experienced mechanic. I'm a young bloke on minimum wage that gets dopamine from air being moved around and got his knowledge from a Donut video on how engines work.]   Thanks for the response though super informative!
    • Yes, it is entirely possible to twincharge a Skyline. It is not....without problems though. There was a guy did it to an SOHC RB30 (and I think maybe it became or already was a 25/30) in a VL Commode. It was a monster. The idea is that you can run both compressors at relatively low pressure ratios, yet still end up with a quite large total pressure ratio because they multiply, not add, boost levels. So, if the blower is spun to give a 1.4:1 PR (ie, it would make ~40 kPa of boost on its own) and the turbo is set up to give a 1.4:1 PR also, then you don't get 40+40 = 80 kPa of boost, you get 1.4*1.4, which is pretty close to 100 kPa of boost. It's free real estate! This only gets better as the PRs increase. If both are set up to yield about 1.7 PR, which is only about 70 kPa or 10ish psi of boost each, you actually end up with about 1.9 bar of boost! So, inevitably it was a bit of a monster. The blower is set up as the 2nd compressor, closest to the motor, because it is a positive displacement unit, so to get the benefit of putting it in series with another compressor, it has to go second. If you put it first, it has to be bigger, because it will be breathing air at atmospheric pressure. The turbo's compressor ends up needing to be a lot larger than you'd expect, and optimised to be efficient at large mass flows and low PRs. The turbo's exhaust side needs to be quite relaxed, because it's not trying to provide the power to produce all the boost, and it has to handle ALL the exhaust flow. I think you need a much bigger wastegate than you might expect. Certainly bigger than for an engine just making the same power level turbo only. The blower effectively multiplies the base engine size. So if you put a 1.7 PR blower on a 2.5L Skyline, it's like turboing a 4.2L engine. Easy to make massive power. Plus, because the engine is blown, the blower makes boost before the turbo can even think about making boost, so it's like having that 4.2L engine all the way from idle. Fattens the torque delivery up massively. But, there are downsides. The first is trying to work out how to size the turbo according to the above. The second is that you pretty much have to give up on aircon. There's not enough space to mount everything you need. You might be able to go elec power steering pump, hidden away somewhere. but it would still be a struggle to get both the AC and the blower on the same side of the engine. Then, you have to ponder whether you want to truly intercool the thing. Ideally you would put a cooler between the turbo and the blower, so as to drop the heat out of it and gain even more benefit from the blower's positive displacement nature. But that would really need to be a water to air core, because you're never going to find enough room to run 2 sets of boost pipes out to air to air cores in the front of the car. But you still need to aftercool after the blower, because both these compressors will add a lot of heat, and you wil have the same temperature (more or less) as if you produced all that boost with a single stage, and no one in their right mind would try to run a petrol engine on high boost without a cooler (unless not using petrol, which we shall ignore for the moment). I'm of the opinnion that 2x water to air cores in the bay and 2x HXs out the front is probably the only sensible way to avoid wasting a lot of room trying to fit in long runs of boost pipe. But the struggle to locate everything in the limited space available would still be a pretty bad optimisation problem. If it was an OEM, they'd throw 20 engineers at it for a year and let them test out 30 ideas before deciding on the best layout. And they'd have the freedom to develop bespoke castings and the like, for manifolds, housings, connecting pipes to/from compressors and cores. A single person in a garage can either have one shot at it and live with the result, or spend 5 years trying to get it right.
    • Good to know, thank you!
×
×
  • Create New...