Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Black BLACK!

Haha. Gtr -> rwd, easy

Gtt-> gtr, so not worth the hassle.

And why do you personally not like awd? Or did you drive a evo and think "nah awd is not for me".

Gtr is a different type of awd. Just saying.

mate, dont get too worked up about the whole thing

without being too harsh on the OP, lets be 100% honest with our selves here, we ALL know that this guy IS NOT going too spend the money on converting his gt-t into a gtr look-a-like. Nor is he going to buy a r34 gtr, just to turn it rwd.

this is an internet based forum where ALOT of people say things they really dont mean.

Now i could be completely wrong, and OP has thousands and thousands of dollars spare to spend on modifying a 12 year old gt-t in such an extreme way, for no real apparent gain, then good luck.

GTR to rwd is easy enough, drop front driveshafts, hack front diff off sump, remove attessa computers etc and chuck in an RB25 box. But I don't see the point.

Have you driven an R and then come to the decision that you don't like the AWD or have you just gone, "Yep the GTT is rwd I like it" and not done any research into how the R actually handles.

I haven't driven a 34R but I have driven a 33R and whilst the 4wd and rwd feel completely different it is a great handling package. Feels a bit heavier in the front but it feels a lot more balanced and smooth. If you want your GT-T to run an rb26 then do that and save the coin on everything else. otherwise drive an R if you haven't already and see if you really do dislike the AWD as much as you think you do.

Another thing to consider, as well as the guards being pumped out and the suspension being mostly the same you will have to swap rear hubs from loop type suspension to fork type and LCA's etc are different to provide you with the added 20mm rear track. Front track however is the same.

soooooooooo yes, no, i need a black or white answer

I like this guy.

With such a great title, I was expecting a thread subtitle along the lines of "just ran over a homeless guy - should I call the cops?" or "I just caught my sister in bed with my mom"...very disappointed...

Ok great stuff here, and also, the money situation isnt a concern, also if i was to stick to the GT-t and i got all original GTR body kit, side skirts bonnet rear left and right quarter pannels front and rear bumper the lot, would it be a hassle to fit onto the gt-t, thank you for your patience people, i greatly appreciate it

Ok great stuff here, and also, the money situation isnt a concern, also if i was to stick to the GT-t and i got all original GTR body kit, side skirts bonnet rear left and right quarter pannels front and rear bumper the lot, would it be a hassle to fit onto the gt-t, thank you for your patience people, i greatly appreciate it

I smell a troll..

I answered the question a few posts back with reference to a R32. same idea.

Ok great stuff here, and also, the money situation isnt a concern, also if i was to stick to the GT-t and i got all original GTR body kit, side skirts bonnet rear left and right quarter pannels front and rear bumper the lot, would it be a hassle to fit onto the gt-t, thank you for your patience people, i greatly appreciate it

also if money is not a concern -buy a R35. that will pull the chicks and get you thrown in jail at the same time.

if you were doing a resto like I am then I could POSSIBLY see your point. at the moment I see a kid and dreams.

put up or shut up :)

also if money is not a concern -buy a R35. that will pull the chicks and get you thrown in jail at the same time.

if you were doing a resto like I am then I could POSSIBLY see your point. at the moment I see a kid and dreams.

put up or shut up :)

THIS

/Thread.

Yes, the AWD system can be disabled. I wouldn't waste the time, effort and money doing such a costly conversion.

>Buy R34 GTR

>Disable the AWD system

>??????

>Profit!

Edited by JDM34

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update Issues 5 (plus #4) - 10 After making a claim about issue #4's missing part, DeAgostini Japan sent a whole new issue #4 and it arrived about 2 weeks after that. That was back in early March. It took another 4 weeks to receive issues 5 - 13 though. This update is for issues 5 - 10. Ove the 5 issues the front left suspension and most of the engine have been completed. The quality of the castings and fit of the parts is quite good, it seems better than DeAgostini's BNR34 Skyline GT-R from the Fast & Furious 2 movie, which (to me anyway) doesn't seem to have as tight tolerances or quite as accurate castings.  Each issue has a lot of info about the 1989 - 1993 Skyline range and other Nissan models from that era, but the focus is on the BNR32 Skyline GT-R Nismo and the various racing it did in Japan, Europe (Spa 24hrs) and of course Australia. I've included some text translated with Google Lens in some photos and will add to them if there's anything worth including. 
    • If it's for a SR20, make sure it's not the American Poncams, might as well call them Poocams. Had a set in a friend's car, all scuffed up after a few track days. Like the metallurgy Tomei USA used is junk. Went back to JDM OG Tomei Poncams, no issues till now.   Tomei USA is not the real OG Tomei.   Random rant over, fk the US of A, bunch of c u n t s. 
    • Most of the industry in North America either runs on Siemens or Allen Bradley. I have two redundant S7-1500's on my desk right next to me for simulation. Siemens has been losing ground though since Stuxnet, as cybersecurity is a big thing. In my line of work that is federally regulated, you must by law have a cybersecurity management program in place and its audited and inspected every so often.  I work with Emerson PLC's daily (RX3i's) and have done large biogas/refinery projects with their DCS's. Their PLC's are somewhat OK minus the way they do PLC redundancy (You have to download on both PLC's separately every time you make a change )  As for their DCS's... you'll be limited financially first before anything else stops you. Costs are exorbiant at roughly 10x what it would cost you to do with any other system (e.g AB PAC).  1990's, those suckers are brand new haha! Kraft-Heinz (An old client when I use to work for an ESP) still runs Siemens TI505 PLC's from the mid 80's. Ohh how I don't miss working with those... you could only do a certain number of online downloads until it's "Change" buffer would be full and you would then need to go offline to do a full download. There was no warning of when this was coming up and it generally would happen when you would go in at 2am to make changes before production -_-.     
    • Unfortunately, not only is that not the case, one of the main "Selling points" of safety over comms is they clearly state in writing that there's no need to segregate safety networks from non-safety networks. It always gets intermingled with everything else on an ICS/OT network. 
×
×
  • Create New...