Jump to content
SAU Community

Injectors  

18 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Hey People,

Last week I destroyed my stock ER34 Ceramic Turbo and I'm in the process of buying some parts to get back on the road.

So far I have purchased:

- HKS GT-RS Turbo

- Apexi Power FC

- Z32 AFM

- Walbro Fuel Pump

Current Modifications Include:

- HKS Hi-Power Exhaust

- Tein Super Streets W/ EDFC

I am looking at getting a V-SPL front mound and Greddy Radiator and plan to run roughly 1bar boost.

All I have left to purchase is injectors but cant seem to find a good set around 500cc - 780cc which is what I believe I need for this setup. Can anyone recommend a good quality injector (good atomisation and wont cause rough idle) that will not bottleneck roughly 270rwkw?

I have read mixed reviews on the Nismo 480cc Injectors regarding the power that they can handle...

Any other thoughts or ideas on this setup would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers Craig.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/392714-er34-modifications/
Share on other sites

I dont think the new radiator is needed unless there's something wrong with your current one, but I'm not an expert.

Can't remember if you mentioned one or not but a boost controller of some description might be an idea as well.

If your not keen on cutting a hole in your car for the return pipe on the fmic you listed, maybe look at a blitz return flow one, but that's up to you.

Edited by Mitcho_7

Deatschwerks 600cc.

Hey People,

Last week I destroyed my stock ER34 Ceramic Turbo and I'm in the process of buying some parts to get back on the road.

So far I have purchased:

- HKS GT-RS Turbo

- Apexi Power FC

- Z32 AFM

- Walbro Fuel Pump

Current Modifications Include:

- HKS Hi-Power Exhaust

- Tein Super Streets W/ EDFC

I am looking at getting a V-SPL front mound and Greddy Radiator and plan to run roughly 1bar boost.

All I have left to purchase is injectors but cant seem to find a good set around 500cc - 780cc which is what I believe I need for this setup. Can anyone recommend a good quality injector (good atomisation and wont cause rough idle) that will not bottleneck roughly 270rwkw?

I have read mixed reviews on the Nismo 480cc Injectors regarding the power that they can handle...

Any other thoughts or ideas on this setup would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers Craig.

Agreed, the radiator isn't needed.

With the injectors, I take it you want something that is direct plug and play? Of the list that you put up, I believe only the Power Enterprise injectors will fit straight in. The Nismo 480's will as well, so depends on what your goals are for the car. I would recommend getting bigger injectors to accommodate any changes you want to make in the future.

I have read mixed reviews on the Nismo 480cc Injectors regarding the power that they can handle...

What do you mean mixed reviews?

A 480cc injector, will support 480hp (360kw) on PULP - or there abouts for the sake of the conversation at hand (it's not 100% accurate, but near enough).

Also consider GTRs will make ~300rwkw on factory injectors. They use a 440cc injector.

Nismo 480cc will be more injector than you'll need for a GT-RS.

What i would be more concerned about is the Walbro fuel pump. This is the suspect part. Some seem to flow fine, others simply do not - that is the 'mixed review' part of your setup.

I also think you'll need more than 1bar for the power you are chasing.

Aren't the Nismo 480 one of the only bolt-in for a NEO?

From what I found when looking for my injectors, yes.

From memory my options were the Nismo 480's (wanted bigger), Siemens Deka's (tuner told me not to), Deatschwerks (couldn't find a lot of info), and the Power Enterprise which is what I ended up going with.

Get the ID1000s (Bosch) they work well at low duty cycles as well.

Forget the radiator

Does the HKS exhaust come with a front pipe? You will need a 3in front pipe.

Consider getting a Nistune board.

From what I found when looking for my injectors, yes.

From memory my options were the Nismo 480's (wanted bigger), Siemens Deka's (tuner told me not to), Deatschwerks (couldn't find a lot of info), and the Power Enterprise which is what I ended up going with.

Well you said:

But they won't suit the stock setup.

What stock setup?

I'm confuse

Well you said:

What stock setup?

I'm confuse

Oh no no, that was your post getting in the way lol :P

I was referring to the ID1000's that Artz posted. They won't suit the stock setup. I took a bit long replying and didn't see your post so I didn't bother quoting haha.

Oh no no, that was your post getting in the way lol :P

I was referring to the ID1000's that Artz posted. They won't suit the stock setup. I took a bit long replying and didn't see your post so I didn't bother quoting haha.

They are topfeed. Do they not fit physically or electrically?

You can get the 14mm collar, so they fit physically. Need a spacer because they are full length while GTT injectors are 3/4 length. They use different plugs is the biggest issue, not a big deal if you know what you're doing or getting them installed. So it's not a huge lot of stuffing around to fit them.

Was just mentioning in case the OP is after drop in OEM replacements and doesn't want to modify anything.

You can just buy adaptor plugs, makes it easier as well for those worried about defects, as opposed to re-wiring the loom

Yeh? Wasn't aware... Do you know where from? I just ordered a set of ID1000's, would be good if I didn't have to rewire.

ill just chime in on the injector side..

cheapest and best injector is the Bosch ID1000's.. they come in either 14mm 3/4 length (standard GTT fuel rail) or 11mm 3/4or full length (GTR fuel rail). They have the best low pulse and spray pattern and cause no idle issues myself, n1GTR and piggaz on here are 3 cars that use these injectors with perfect idle (these are the only 3 that I have had first hand contact with) They also come with the assosiated plugs, pins, baskets which is a 20 min job to repin your existing injector loom (which is 2 clips and 1 plug to remove)

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/375166-fuel-and-injector-needs/

^^ one of the cheapest i have found besides one shop on ebay in the US

ill just chime in on the injector side..

cheapest and best injector is the Bosch ID1000's.. they come in either 14mm 3/4 length (standard GTT fuel rail) or 11mm 3/4or full length (GTR fuel rail). They have the best low pulse and spray pattern and cause no idle issues myself, n1GTR and piggaz on here are 3 cars that use these injectors with perfect idle (these are the only 3 that I have had first hand contact with) They also come with the assosiated plugs, pins, baskets which is a 20 min job to repin your existing injector loom (which is 2 clips and 1 plug to remove)

http://www.skylinesa...injector-needs/

^^ one of the cheapest i have found besides one shop on ebay in the US

I ended up going with the XSPURTS 1000cc, they are a Bosch injector that is apparently modified, they were plug in units but they are full height which didn't matter to me as i ran a HKS rail anyway.... They weren't cheap though ($990 i think).... I originally had SARD 550's which were a drop in injector too, they just had a small rail spacer.

http://www.xspurtinjectors.com/

There are plenty of cheaper injectors out there, but i figured its one of those things i want to fit and forget so i spent the extra cash on them, they should suit any further upgrades too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
×
×
  • Create New...