Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hope you take on board that feedback from Aaron Klaver.

That guy is clearly on the ball, and VicRoads is clearly not with the typical text book responses that do nothing to work in the way of FIXING the very problem they have created.

In actual fact it's quite disgraceful the responses that have been given and as a VicRoads rep, if I were you - I'd be appalled.

Hope you take on board that feedback from Aaron Klaver.

That guy is clearly on the ball, and VicRoads is clearly not with the typical text book responses that do nothing to work in the way of FIXING the very problem they have created.

In actual fact it's quite disgraceful the responses that have been given and as a VicRoads rep, if I were you - I'd be appalled.

Bez likes this

Hope you take on board that feedback from Aaron Klaver.

That guy is clearly on the ball, and VicRoads is clearly not with the typical text book responses that do nothing to work in the way of FIXING the very problem they have created.

In actual fact it's quite disgraceful the responses that have been given and as a VicRoads rep, if I were you - I'd be appalled.

Good post Aaron, good post Ash!

What was the goal of quiz that I just did and what was it meant to prove?

I mean seriously... What should you do in the event of an accident with a bike rider. 1. Get outta there. 2. Get Details. 3. Get Aggro.

Is part of my rego fee going towards paying for the creation of this quiz? *sigh*

Trust me guys NSW is no better Mark skaife actually had to defend somebody who said that young people should do defensive driver training or advanced driver training programs as apparently there is no conclusive evidence that this would help reduce the death toll of young drivers?? Well of course there is no evidence because they have never given it a go! What is there to lose??

This isn't the first we've heard from Vicroads on the forums, only for the rep not to return until their next pointless topic. How about instead of spruiking your rhetoric, you do the reading and pay attention to what's already been/being discussed on our forums (I don't have FB, can someone post this link on their wall?):

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/336284-compulsory-licence-re-testing/

Check that out and the support for it. And this on an import forum - we are the modern day James Deans...bitumen terrorists...the "worst" drivers on the road if you believe the TT/ACA hype. Along the lines of what Aaron is saying...the public want others and themselves to be better road users...how about enforcing it?

drove through a pothole today so deep my front lip hit the ground - fix yo shit vic roads - i dont care about a bike - there is bike paths

I did that too. Cost my my insurance company a lot of money since vicroads wouldn't pay out

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The steering wheel on my 97 s3 gtr is a little bit worn out, so im on the hunt for something mint. I notice that this type of steering wheel is on several other nissan's of the era.  Does anyone know if their all identical, or are there slight differences? I feel like gtr tax applies to anyone selling one, but if it comes from any other car the price is much less, even though its the same design.  Chat gpt says the material for the gtr is slightly different and it says gtr on the wheel, but every pic ive seen it just says nissan. 
    • I might have to say it.
    • Ahh... it's an early RE5R01A box, that means the pinouts I gave are wrong (they were for the RE4R01A 4-speed box)... I'll have to dig around in my docs to see if I've got that schematic (they used the same gearbox plug, with the vacant pin wired to the direct drive clutch solenoid)...prolly hidden away in a supplement somewhere... ...there were 3 variants of the RE5R01A ~ this early schema was what we called the 'dumb' 5 speed ; it's what jatco called a 'medium duty' box, with torque holding up roughly ~200ft/lbs or so, which was good for NA from RB20/25DE and up to around VG30 output spec. With the RB25DET (and VG33/35 mills), the only options they had was the 4-speed 4AX00 box, which had been beefed up to handle the extra torque (primarily for the VG35, but it also suited the RB25DET mill and others)...and the RE4R03 box in large 4WDs a lot of the time... ...the next variant of 5-speed was redesigned, stronger, and 'smart'...first ones had external TCU with internal (on valvebody) Shift Control Unit, pressure switches, and 2 x TSS...and the last ones had internal TCU+SCU setup, with CANbus control etc etc. @DRoc81 On the RHS of the box towards the rear, there should be a stamped silver ID tag -- what's the model number? Oh...and with the early 5-speeds, the torque converter control solenoid assembly should be replaced as well (31940-60X00)...it's a bit Murphy's Law ....if one has failed, bet on the rest not being far behind ...
    • I remembered wrong, but was close though 1Kz setting because those Jaycar SSRs don't go any faster, 1x pump per SSR with flyback diodes & heatsinks. In saying that, the heatsinks are overkill. Just on an alloy plate is more than sufficient. You'll find without a flyback diode, your SSRs will heat up big time and also die prematurely.  I've been running the two same SSRs since the last motor, no issues, car does 2 hour straight drives in summer once in a while and gets punished on the track. Nothing melts, no hot messes, etc.    
    • Hmm. You're probably best off working out what the lobe centreline or even the LSA is for the stock cams, with VCT OFF. That's bound to be out there somewhere. Then, work on the assumption that the Kelford centreline is probably the same, and wouldn't be more than a couple of degrees away, if it is different at all. I'm very surprised that you needed to adjust the exhaust cam by 5° to get it on spec. That screams there's another problem somewhere. Anything from the belt being 1 tooth off (how many degrees is one tooth worth?) to simple user/measurement error on the degree wheel. I say this because Kelford, like most quality cam manufacturers these days, does a pretty good job of actually making the cams to spec, not relying on patching it up afterwards like we had to do back in the 80s.
×
×
  • Create New...