Jump to content
SAU Community

Hanaldo's R34 Gt(T) Skyline Build


Recommended Posts

Yeh all my lines are braided. From memory the block thread is M14x1.5. Speedflow make a banjo fitting that works, but don't use it. Banjo fittings can suck it. Better to use a M14x1.5 to -6 straight adapter and then whatever fittings you need from there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, serviced the car last night and it drove perfectly to the tuners this morning. Fingers crossed it all goes ok, plan is for the tuner to have a look at it, see what I've done and then give me a call to let me know how it goes ahead from there. With any luck it will be done tomorrow, though I know better than that to bank on it.

As for goals, ill be happy if it drives well and makes it back over 350rwhp. Not expecting more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just spent 25 minutes on the phone with Danny discussing my setup before he does the flex fuel tune. Wanted to know everything and anything, from how I wired the flex fuel sensor and pinned it to the ECU, to how I setup my cams, to what cat is on it. It's this phoning me and asking me questions and talking to me that gives me so much confidence in taking my car to him, no other place I've been has ever asked anything about the car other than what ECU it has. He even asked me to send him a copy of the dyno sheet from my last tune so he can overlay it with other cars using the same turbo as me, to see if he can spot anything wrong.

So it's so far so good. He said he is starting the car now, so will keep me updated via text messages on what he is doing and how the car is going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, scratch that. Off to pick up the car now, but not for the reason I had hoped...

Tuner called me at about 6:30 this morning to inform me that after spending an hour on the phone with Link, he has worked out that the Link actually doesn't support a true flex fuel setup. They only support the ethanol sensor as an input for a 4th axis, so you can do your fuel and timing maps with ethanol percentage as a correction. But that means to do a flex fuel setup, you would need to tune the fuel and timing maps at 5% increments from 0% E85 to 100% E85. Which would be hugely expensive to do. But then there is also no correction on the Link for cold start enrichment, etc. You can only have the settings for one fuel there. Link's solution is to set those things up half way between each fuel, but really that just makes the car hard to start on all fuels. So even if you did tune the car at 5% increments all through the range, it still wouldn't be a true flex fuel setup because the other settings don't have corrections for ethanol %.

So the car will still go ahead on E85, but it won't be flex fuel. It will be tuned for between 60%-90% ethanol to allow for the variation in the pump fuel, but I can still only run E85. If I want to use unleaded fuel again then I'll have to purge the tank and upload the current tune. So I essentially have a very expensive, little bit fancier, Power FC. Fkn awesome.

Anyway, after deciding what to do there, my tuner discussed with me what to do about the low power and lag. He is 99% sure that the cam timing is still out. So I am off to pick the car up now to re-check the cam timing. All in all, not the news I wanted to be getting about the car today. More money ill-spent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you seen SS8_Gohan's thread about flex fueling. He has a link plugin on his 34 might be slightly different with GTRs. Also I talked to Unigroup engineering and they said its possible to be a true flex fuel. Might just be a lil trick your tuner needs to learn to get it going. I hope thats not the same case with my VIPEC.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/366722-e8598-flex-fuel-mission-complete-thanks-to-chequered-tuning/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I've seen it, but that's not a true flex setup. It has been manually set up at each ethanol percentage increment, which is hugely expensive in dyno time. It was an be done, but it's not affordable. Would be cheaper and easier to but the Haltech and set that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice solution to fixing the broken push lock fitting on the fuel tank. I did the same and drilled both of mine out so I could run bulkhead fittings with AN ends so I can run teflon straight in and out of the tank. Sealed up with some silicon sealant and it works a treat.

Sucks to hear about the Link's flex setup not being ideal, the Haltech method is definitely proven and works well. :)

Just noticed you put your flex sensor in the exact same spot as mine also! haha couldnt think of a better place for it..

E6wbNbEl.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haha nice! Its definitely a good spot, nice and easy! What did you do about the jet pump on the fuel lid? From what I understand, thus acts as a venturi for getting fuel from the tank on the other side of the hump to the pump side. That's why I didn't do the return fitting at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well that was a big waste of time. Rechecked my cam timing using my tuners method of measuring cam duration at 50 thou valve lift, then finding the centreline. This is a very repeatable method so easy to check for errors. But with this method, I got 121.5° on the inlet cam and 116.5° on the exhaust cam. They are supposed to be 120 and 115, so they were a tiny bit out but nothing that explains the problem.

Poor tuner sat on the phone with me late last night and early this morning going over things, he just had to drop off his kids at school now and I'm expecting a call back from him shortly. Absolutely mammoth effort from him to make sure I am doing things correctly, so now we are at least both confident that the cam timing is not the issue and we can go from here. Leaves us both very confused about where the missing power and lag is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The two diagrams are equivalent. The R32 one is just one sheet out of about 3 showing everything in the whole car all at once. And without knowing the functionality that occurs in the modules, they are both equally opaque.
    • 8v - 2.48ms 9v - 2.15ms 10v - 1.74ms 11v - 1.41ms 12v - 1.15ms 13v - 0.99ms 14v - 0.89ms 15v - 0.82ms 16v - 0.81ms I'm running these values on my RB20 Neo with 570cc Denso R35 stock jets and it's great. Also bought a set for my Legnum VR4, love these injectors!
    • Thanks for your reply,  Those blue/green wires running to the actuator aren't attached to anything, so I'm not sure how the central locking is still working. I will have to take a good look tomorrow, I don't have the car with me. After googling it seems like a pretty common aftermarket actuator which even uses the same green/blue wires the immobiliser required. i'll test everything tomorrow and if it's working i'll melt the solder, strip it, resolder and neaten it all up with some heat shrink. I don't have to understand it if it works hahaha I just don't want a fire/ short circuit. That R32 diagram looks more like a continuity chart? Can you make sense of this form the R34 manual? 10V is probably due to very flat battery, i'll recheck as well tomorrow, I did have to jump start it haha. Thanks again!  
    • So, COM doesn't mean comms. It means common. What common itself means will depend on the type of device. For a two directional actuator (ie, one that can push and pull on the same output rod) then the common will typically just be the earth connection. There will be at least 2 other wires. If you put 12V on one of the other wires, then the actuator will push. On the other 12V wire, it will pull. Can't quite make out what is going on with the wiring of your actuator. It appears to have several wires at the actuator plug, but there only appears to be 2 wires where its loom approaches the door control module, with at least one of the others cut off. I don't know these actuators off by heart. I'd have to look at a wiring diagram for one before knowing what the wires were about, and that's despite me having to replace one in my car not all that long ago. Just not interesting enough to have dedicated memory set aside for trivia like that any more. That actuator is an aftermarket one, not the original one, which probably died and was replaced. That might require some sort of bodge job on wiring to make it work. Although nothing should justify the bodginess of the bodge job done. As to the soldering job on the door module's loom plug. Ahhahhahaha. Yes, very nasty. Again, I cant tell you what any of those wires do. You'd need to study the R34 wiring diagram (if you can find one that shows the door module). I don't think I have any. I'd have to study the R32 diagram to start to understand what mine is doing, and again, even though I've had a problem with mine for the last 25 years (where it locks the passenger door when the driver's window reaches top or bottom of travel) I'm just not interested enough to try to to work it out. So long as it's not burning down, it's fine with me. Here's the R32 GTR diagram, which, confusingly, has rear door lock actuators and window motors on it!! As you can see, unless you understand the functions of the door lock timer and the power window amplifier, you'll never be able to work out how it works just from the diagram. I don't imagine that the R34 one is any better. Hopefully an R34 aware bod can help. FWIW, the two wires that are cut and joined look like they are both power supply - so hopefully it is not fatal to join them. The 10V you measured on the cut off free end of one of them is concerning. You'd expect 12V, and it might be the reason for the bodge job joining them together.
×
×
  • Create New...