Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm more after response then outright power, I'm happy with the power atm just want it to come on sooner (of course making power will be a bonus :D) . Hrmm so you think getting a bigger exhaust system will help in response? I would of thought it would of been the opposite? Correct me if I'm wrong please.

Here are my mods:

R33 Block

-N1 Crank

-Forge Pistons

-Forge Rods

-Race Bearings

-Head & MainStuds

-N1 water and oil pumps

Garrett 2860-5

HKS dump pipes and front pipes

Hi flow cat

HKS Hi Power Silent Exhaust (According to their website its is 95mm 3.7")

Tomei camshafts

Mine's adjustable cam gears

Sard intank Fuel pump

SARD Fuel Rail + Fuel Pressure Regulator

SARD 700cc Fuel Injectors

Haltech Platinum PRO

110mm thick intercooler

HKS intercooler hard pipe kit

If there is any kind of restriction then yes having the right size exhaust will help with response,

cam gears can be dialed in for response if thats what ur really chasing

usually an intercooler that thick isnt required and probs isnt helping with response but its there now so leave it :thumbsup:

also i would suggest doing the twin turbo pipe modification as well which will help with response and power by reducing turbulance... PM me if your keen for more info and i can supply it or i can modify the one u have :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Measure the exhaust at it smallest (might be in the muffler). If you need/get a bigger one it definitely won't harm your response - a big single definitely will.

If the exhaust is ok (or replaced) just turn up the boost untill it stops making power or runs out of fuel (don't know what the Sard pumps are good for). Why did your tuner not want to turn up the boost? You will need to spend some $$ for dyno time to get the right cam settings.

Full Boost @ 4900rpm. 20PSI is what my tuner says its safe I don't want to push anymore then that on 98octane. Will I require upgrade fuel setup if I run 20psi on the GTX? currently running an intank SARD fuel pump.

You should have 20psi in by 4000-4200rpm. Not 4900rpm, no way my -5s are that laggy on my 2.6l

Clearly your set-up needs better boost control and/or tuning.

Mine isn't fully tuned and I'm running a completely different set up mate

Full race twin scroll with a 83/75 BG

Mine made 25psi at 3450 but the waste gates were stuck closed cause they are new..

Though that is with old fuel and cam gears set at 0

Results will be posted soon, hard to compare atm, but our turbo set ups have close to the potential power

Just because u have a hks exhaust doesn't mean that its flowing properly

Also talk to your tuner about setting up the cam gears and let us know

The result

haha 20psi at 3500rpm ??? dreaming! lol

my gt35 on my stock rb26 hits 20psi at 4400rpm and thats with a 1bar spring, it could possibly come down to 4200 or so with a 20psi spring setup in the wastegate, im also running poncams

^ Totally agree, especially with a GTX - I keep meaning to come in to add that 2c. RB25 and RB26 don't spool turbos much different at all, I've actually experienced both an RB25 and RB26 with equivalent cam specs, manifolds and .82a/r GT3582Rs and they both made very similar power and hit 20psi at 4300rpm.

The GT3540 (.63 a/r) on my RB30/25 is only tuned to 15psi atm which it hits at 3,500

Will let you know how it does when it is retuned to 21 or so psi ( will have wastegate set at 18-19 and boost controller for the rest).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...