Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 203
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hated how all the "hoon" side claimed to be "car enthusiasts" when clearly they werent imo. one of the kids on there is on my facebook and is the biggest honn going around, posting skids and diccussions about aquiring stokies for the night :angry: dont know how anyone can claim car enthusiast and not know about track days and more than likely still does skids on the street

edit: some on the hoon side looked like genuine enthusiasts

Edited by drunkn snail

The kid that spoke the most just dug a hole for himself.

Looks like all they did was admit to driving over 200km/h

Then say stupid things about having a sook if he gets a yellow sticker and going doing burnouts.

Wish I could see the whole thing unedited and see what valid points there actually were.

Got any examples of what quality material was said?

that was rediculous way to swing the questions asked in the view of the people opposing "hoons"

how about the cops turn around and suggest a day each week where the race tracks are open and free for us to use??

thats why idiots use the streets, why pay to drive on the track for what 5-8mins?? and pay $70?

theirs my answer be nice if one day they listened..

Did anybody seriously think it was going to be shown in any other way? What kind of ACA viewer wants to see a fair an balanced discussion?

I honestly can't believe that hoons are still the hot topic of discussion, they've been running with it for what? 5 years now?

That's ACA for you, sensationalist BS IMHO, I'm sure our boys when given the chance would be raising all sorts of valid points pointing at the massive difference between enthusiasts and hoons.

No enthusiast that I have met has ever though burnouts were good anywhere other than at a drag-strip before a run and not one true enthusiast thinks that drifting on a main road in the wet is a good idea.

Sadly there are people out there who feel that doing a skid is better than sex and that naked ladies will jump in your car if you get sideways around a corner.

Most of the people on here have put way too much money/blood sweat and tears into their pride and joy to do stuff like that anywhere as silly as open roads when there are perfectly good tracks etc. out there where you don't have to worry about the po-po and silly nana speed limits.

just my 2c

feel free to disagree

Well the usual 1 sided crap... nothing new.

EDIT: & LOL @ the cop who says that 99.9% of the community obey road rules... maybe if he only meant always driving 10km/h under & taking 30 seconds to accelerate.

What about those who never indicates, hog the right lane on the freeway, doesn't stop for stop signs. All breaking road rules I see constantly by "normal" people in their white eco boxes.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

EDIT: & LOL @ the cop who says that 99.9% of the community obey road rules... maybe if he only meant always driving 10km/h under & taking 30 seconds to accelerate.

Yeah that was a totally bullshit statement.

I mean how can the Vic Gov't rake in over 500 Million in speeding fines per year if 99.9% of people are behaving? :)

And those are the ones that get caught.

Yeah that was a totally bullshit statement.

I mean how can the Vic Gov't rake in over 500 Million in speeding fines per year if 99.9% of people are behaving? :)

And those are the ones that get caught.

Did you say that? Lol

Have to remember what you're potentially arguing with when you argue with a cop

https://apply.police...t/the-test.html

I see nothing about research major in statistics or the superhuman sensory perception their powers bestow them with :)

Yeah that was a totally bullshit statement.

I mean how can the Vic Gov't rake in over 500 Million in speeding fines per year if 99.9% of people are behaving? :)

And those are the ones that get caught.

Please tell me you mentioned that while you were there haha.

E: Sunkist beat me to it >.<

Edited by topher_

Didn't get a chance to raise that statement, had already questioned a number of others and brought up other points

All of which were logical unfortunately. Next time i'll just yell and carry on, but make valid points - that'll get airtime cause retards @ home wont know the difference if there is a show on display

But risk it on the road...Kill someone life in prison

hm, really? who's going to be on the dandenong mountains for you to kill other than yourself. not that i do that, but the fact that track days are so bloody expensive for minimal time, doesn't really make anyone who hasn't done trackdays wanna do a track day.

might seem expensive for a mere 3 x 20mins, but 20mins is bloody long on the track. I understand that, but do you think the random on the street with his $5000 vt is willing to spend the money? doubt so.

Really though - those types will never go along to a track even if it were free and easily accessible - that's just their cop out. They will always find more thrill in what they can't legally do - much like how most of us felt the first time we drank underage.

Really though - those types will never go along to a track even if it were free and easily accessible - that's just their cop out. They will always find more thrill in what they can't legally do - much like how most of us felt the first time we drank underage.

I was six years old...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...