Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Okay I know I am gonna get flamed for this but I jumped the gun on my project and began scrapping the exterior engine items and also in so doing while trying to get to the oil pump I had to remove my timing belt and crank gear. Problem now is that I did not set the cam gears to the markers and the crank appropriately. Any advice as I cannot say for certain that the crank is at the same position since I removed it, it is definitely not been turned more than a couple of teether on the flywheel side so what are my options? Will it be necessary to remove the head and ensure that cylinder 1 is a TDC and then ensure that the cam gears are at the markers before torquing it back or can I do something else to get everything back where it should be? I currently have the sump off so was wondering if I can somehow turn the crank and manually turn the gears to get it set or should I just swap back on the front crank gear without the oil pump and rotate the entire assembly until it is at the markers? Any advice is greatly appreciated, yes I know I made a huge mistake but need to correct it. I have parts on order for the engine so I am waiting for those to be shipped in, gasket kit, adjustable gears, tensioner stud, water hard tubes, tensioner and idler pullies, new timing belt, coolant and vacuum lines etc so wanted to get things prepped for assembly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396159-problem-timing-belt-advice/
Share on other sites

If you removed the spark plugs, turned it by hand, would you cause damage if it hit the valves?

probably not...

usually you could put a big socket extension down cyl 1 spark plug tube, you'll see it move up and down when you turn the engine and be able to tell where tdc is, then the belt will only sit over one tooth with perfect TDC.

At worst you could take the cams out so there'll be no valve interference if you need to turn just the crank- easier than removing the head. Then put it all back together in the right position when you get the new gear. The valves can also interfere with each other if you spin the cams individually, and you will get piston and valve interference with valves that are open if you just spin the crank, not worth risking any damage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...