Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As a tuner, I prefer not to use it. It's too unreliable and a lot of people tack it on without any safeties. When the kit fails, you get a massive amount of detonation which is more than enough to destroy a motor. I have seen cars come in with clogged nozzles. How long they have been beating on them - you have no idea. It could throw a rod on the first dyno ramp. Once again, no idea. A lot of these people also have zero motivation to service the WMI kit - cleaning nozzles, testing them etc. 

If you insist on using it, I suggest these as a minimum:

- Aftermarket ECU with proper safeties set up
- A FLOW meter, not a pressure sensor wired to the ECU and protections set up. no flow = no boost and timing. 
- Decent lines and pump
- A proper solenoid nozzle that supports PWM and has a very good spray pattern

Tuning will cost a fair bit more but it will save your engine. 

3 hours ago, The Mafia said:

As a tuner, I prefer not to use it. It's too unreliable and a lot of people tack it on without any safeties. When the kit fails, you get a massive amount of detonation which is more than enough to destroy a motor. I have seen cars come in with clogged nozzles. How long they have been beating on them - you have no idea. It could throw a rod on the first dyno ramp. Once again, no idea. A lot of these people also have zero motivation to service the WMI kit - cleaning nozzles, testing them etc. 

If you insist on using it, I suggest these as a minimum:

- Aftermarket ECU with proper safeties set up
- A FLOW meter, not a pressure sensor wired to the ECU and protections set up. no flow = no boost and timing. 
- Decent lines and pump
- A proper solenoid nozzle that supports PWM and has a very good spray pattern

Tuning will cost a fair bit more but it will save your engine. 

Basically everything you described + the annoyance of keeping all of that stuff working is bad enough that as much as I'm in love with the idea I can't bring myself to actually do it.

40 minutes ago, joshuaho96 said:

Basically everything you described + the annoyance of keeping all of that stuff working is bad enough that as much as I'm in love with the idea I can't bring myself to actually do it.

E85 is so much better. Even in E40 form. It's shame that you don't have access to it. 

A water meth kit can be made reliable but it takes a few sensors and a decent ECU like the Link G4x. 

23 minutes ago, The Mafia said:

E85 is so much better. Even in E40 form. It's shame that you don't have access to it. 

A water meth kit can be made reliable but it takes a few sensors and a decent ECU like the Link G4x. 

I have E85 locally, the US loves subsidizing corn and corn ethanol. Also we've banned basically every other octane booster at this point so ethanol is the only thing that you can get for a reasonable price. I plan on doing flex fuel eventually.

If you have E85 available at the pump, that would be my go to option. If you don't, like us in Canada then WMI becomes very interesting and is safe to use with proper integration and safeties setup. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You ask for things. You specifically state you want responsiveness. A link was provided for a far superior, more responsive option. Find a MX5 workshop that will install it for you. Maybe MX5 Mania will throw on the Fab9 kit. It seems they want to charge almost 14K installed for their kit, so if they charge you $6K to install the FAB9 kit then you'll be ahead? Though really, the 2.5 with a 2860 running low boost will more or less feel as good as anything else. It's a lot of displacement and a small turbo. Think of a more modern RB26 with one stock turbo :p TBH, truth be told I've been driving my own car, and use about 50% throttle at most for 99.9% of the time. Mr Bogan is likely similar so this is all going to be semantics for the use case he actually has. (He'll be happy with anything relative to now) However, the EFR is hands down far superior in this use case. You really, really, really, really do notice it over the Garrett or equivalent.  
    • You are correct, the earlier the torque, the earlier things snap
    • Gents, it will be getting the MX5 Mania kit and the 2.5 will be staying where it is My query was about the 0.64 or the 0.86, whilst the 0.64 might spool a bit faster, would the 0.86 be better IRT EGT and mechanical sympathy, with only a small difference in spool And as I assume I won't need alot of boost to get to 200kw, probably around 10 psi, and with max rpm at 6500, would high EGT even really be a issue with a 0.64 I'm heading into MX5 Mania at the end of Jan to discuss the install, so any info is welcome prior to that Basically have a chat and book a time so they can throw on the turbo kit, and fit a oil cooler with a thermostat, drive in drive out of course  In other news: just finished cleaning the car inside and out, it's now all ready to get covered in bugs and dirt driving to Goulburn tomorrow to lunch,  and go for a stroll along woolondilly River with the daughter and her boy, and of course, visit my grandcats and my new grandpuppy 
    • Sounds like it has an actual problem with mode select doors, or something.
    • Hope your all having a mean Xmas! If anyone happens to know any trick to using the insanely complex climate control system, I cannot get it to not be on dual zone no matter how many times I deselect it (will say it's not but both vents blow different temps). Also one side is always hot, one always cold 🤷
×
×
  • Create New...