Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If I'm gonna go ahead with this ive narrowed it down to 2 kits:

Snow performance stage 2 kit

Or

AEM injection kit

Just looking into the availability of methanol and if it's worth running in a internaly stock rb26 aiming for around 330ish kw

I won't be using this kit to push more power, but thinking it could be a better option than E85 as its not always available on long drives etc

If its to only be used for "safety" could it only be used on demineralized water to keep intake temps down?

If I'm gonna go ahead with this ive narrowed it down to 2 kits:

Snow performance stage 2 kit

Or

AEM injection kit

Just looking into the availability of methanol and if it's worth running in a internaly stock rb26 aiming for around 330ish kw

I won't be using this kit to push more power, but thinking it could be a better option than E85 as its not always available on long drives etc

If its to only be used for "safety" could it only be used on demineralized water to keep intake temps down?

I may be interested to sell my Snow Performance stage 2 kit, if your interested it could save you a couple of dollars. Its still BNIB.

Using demineralized water should let you reach the further point of the compressors flow. IE if you want to run -9s on your car but know 330kw is probably their limit if your lucky, using water injection would get you there 'easier', if not a little further (due to the ability to push more boost).

Ive changed plans with my car for now (as I always do) and will pick them up again after some alter-life (non car related things) are taken care of. If nobody wants to save a couple of dollars by picking up my kit I will just leave it on the shelf where it is.

this may be a stupid question, but where do you purchase methanol from?

I got mine from repco - purchased a 20 litre drum. I could have got it cheaper elsewhere but then I was stuck with finding a courier/carrier that would transport it - being flammable, most don't want to know about it.

And your car won't rust away if you set your thresholds at say 30% IDC and 5psi. Think about it, you won't be boosting coming up your street or entering your driveway, so any WMI should have burnt off/evaporated well and truly before you turn the car off. However if your driving it like a getaway car then all bets are off.

And I've never heard of WMI going jelly, I've had some mixed up in a plastic bottle [i carry it for trips as a reserve and really haven't had to use it] for around 12 months and I can't see any difference. I'll keep it seperate now and see, but if it hasn't done it by now then it probably won't happen. The only thing I can think of [and you'd need a chemical degree/Mythbusters to prove it] is if there is some evaporation of the Methanol out of the water and through the plastic container - talking atoms here. And I'd say that the effects would have to be so small as to be negligible. Even if it does happen, you'd still be using WI, which would have a semi similar effect [previously discussed in this thread and others], so overall I'm not concerned for my car or set up.

  • 4 weeks later...

Am I right in saying that the Aquamist HFS3-v2 starts injection at a set manifold presure/MAF sensor reading, but injects proportional to the injector cycle? Ie 2.5 volts to trigger the system on, then a constant 15% water to fuel injection by mocking injector cycle? Do any other kits offer this exact method?

got some killer before and after graphs for water meth, i love the stuff.. great substitute if e85 is not available as the better option. i will chase them up and post them

What kit have you been using...?

WIll post them up tomorrow. Snow performance kits.

M5 supercharged bimmer 300 without 340 wmi on

s14 tomei t25 footprint turbo 295rwkw without 330 wmi on

Jzz30 soarer cant quite remember but we ran out of spark but was 420rwkw something wmi on.

I am another non believer of W or WM injection having anything to do with compression ratios be they static or dynamic .

Firstly you have to compress the charge air and fuel before the mixture is fired so anything going on before the fire is lit is a pre not current combustion event .

Maybe what people are trying to say is that the water vapour changing state increases the combustion pressure but I find that a bit hard to believe as well .

Many years ago David Vizard wrothe a book called How to modify Ford SOHC Engines and he speaks about using water or water methanol injection as being as anti detonant injection . He quite rightly states that water doesn't burn and you need to take a minimalist approach meaning just enough water to supress detonation and no more or performance suffers .

I think to understand how the process works we have to understand what causes the detonation so we can find ways to prevent it . In my mind its often heat and pressure in the chambers that cooks the mixture off and ignites it at an unintentional place and time . I believe all the water mist can be expected to do if metered properly is drop the combustion pressure/temperature to the point that the mixture doesn't light up at all unless the ignition system innitiates it .

Where your extra power (torque) comes from is being able to run ignition timing numbers aimed at the most efficient combustion rather than most efficient means of preventing the engine killing itself .

Also as mentioned methanol has large evapourative cooling effect and lower charge temps means lower combustion temps all else being equal . This added to the fact that methanol is a flammable gas (vapour) means you counteract the fact that water doesn't burn so an around 50/50 mix starts to look pretty good .

Everyone has their own theories and atm from what I've read and spoken to people about these seem to make sense to me anyway .

A .

Edited by discopotato03

My theory as follows (with zero intention to condescend or offend and I well and truly recognize I am no particle engineer):

Water takes up less volume than its steam counterpart. Steam is the byproduct of water exchanging for heat. So the water soaks up heat, and surpresses detonation, but converts into steam which occupies more volume than its original form and thus incurs an increase in pressure (being a sealed chamber).

So while you might be saying your surpressing heat which is in turn pressure, the result is still pressure without the heat.

The reality here is that we cant run a pressure gauge into the cylinder while its running, so we will never know whos right or wrong. But the 2 variables are that there is either more or less pressure in the cylinder after the process. Perhaps the heat the water takes away has a higher potential for pressure than the resultant steam does, or perhaps the opposite. Who knows.

Dismissing an increase in pressure simply because an overdose of water acts as a power suppressant is like dismissing the fact water douses fire.

What I do know is that WI is rather effective lol now lets be friends and hoon on forever.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
    • I like this page, better than that silly turbo kit   https://v8roadsters.com/product-category/engine-conversions/engine-conversion-lsx/engine-conversion-lsx-nc/  
    • That would be my Shoei helmet
×
×
  • Create New...