Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick car it made 295RWKW on 12 psi, RB30DET (RB30/25) 

MOTOR;

Blue printed, crack tested, chamically cleaned, bored & honed RB30T Over sized flat top RB30/26 CP Pistons

CP pistion rings

Forged Howards H beam con rods

ACL Race bearings

copper head gasket

12mm N1 RB26 ARP head studs

Race prepped and collard crank

RB30 turbo oil pump & water pump

External oil cooler

Tomei Poncam Cams

R&R Lifters

Fully serviced and prepped head

770cc Injectors

Massive aluminium plenum

High mounted T67 Turbo running off stainless manifold. Externally gated

3" stainless exhaust (puts out a mean note)

Blitz turbo timer

Blow off valve

Hybrid Intercooler (painted black)

Apexi power FC computer

Exedy brass button heavy duty clutch

Silvers track spec fully adjustable coilovers all round 

Brand new in box Hard race adjustable camber arms 

Slotted disks with high quality pads

INTERIOR & EXTERIOR;

Blitz light weight wheels

WRX front bucket seats

This motor was built as a track/drag motor. Very reliable, bottom end is worth over $8,000 alone, I have receipts. It is tuned for track at this stage, if you wanted 350+ RWKW just go get it tuned.

Rego runs out Jan 2013 asking price is 17k Ono

Has engineers cert and exhaust db reading fully engineered!!!

I can text pictures as I only have my iPhone no computer atm 0407436404 text only as I work shift work. Car is a bit of a sleeper it's not a show car it gets driven has been tracked but not drifted, my intention was to drift it but my circumstances have change and it has to go.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396737-r33-gts-t-rb3025/
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention this car is in the hunter valley NSW not qld.

Am open to offers or swaps. Swaps id be interested in are 4 doors or stagea. Manual or auto.

  • 2 months later...

car sounds very familiar - got any photos?

your right, this car was for sale over near epping around January

--nothing bad to say about it! i can vouge for it

Must admit everything about the car was great... i just chose i wanna go AWD.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...