Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quick car it made 295RWKW on 12 psi, RB30DET (RB30/25) 

MOTOR;

Blue printed, crack tested, chamically cleaned, bored & honed RB30T Over sized flat top RB30/26 CP Pistons

CP pistion rings

Forged Howards H beam con rods

ACL Race bearings

copper head gasket

12mm N1 RB26 ARP head studs

Race prepped and collard crank

RB30 turbo oil pump & water pump

External oil cooler

Tomei Poncam Cams

R&R Lifters

Fully serviced and prepped head

770cc Injectors

Massive aluminium plenum

High mounted T67 Turbo running off stainless manifold. Externally gated

3" stainless exhaust (puts out a mean note)

Blitz turbo timer

Blow off valve

Hybrid Intercooler (painted black)

Apexi power FC computer

Exedy brass button heavy duty clutch

Silvers track spec fully adjustable coilovers all round 

Brand new in box Hard race adjustable camber arms 

Slotted disks with high quality pads

INTERIOR & EXTERIOR;

Blitz light weight wheels

WRX front bucket seats

This motor was built as a track/drag motor. Very reliable, bottom end is worth over $8,000 alone, I have receipts. It is tuned for track at this stage, if you wanted 350+ RWKW just go get it tuned.

Rego runs out Jan 2013 asking price is 17k Ono

Has engineers cert and exhaust db reading fully engineered!!!

I can text pictures as I only have my iPhone no computer atm 0407436404 text only as I work shift work. Car is a bit of a sleeper it's not a show car it gets driven has been tracked but not drifted, my intention was to drift it but my circumstances have change and it has to go.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/396737-r33-gts-t-rb3025/
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention this car is in the hunter valley NSW not qld.

Am open to offers or swaps. Swaps id be interested in are 4 doors or stagea. Manual or auto.

  • 2 months later...

car sounds very familiar - got any photos?

your right, this car was for sale over near epping around January

--nothing bad to say about it! i can vouge for it

Must admit everything about the car was great... i just chose i wanna go AWD.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...