Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wouldn't heating only part of the block make is distort more than if the heated the whole thing evenly?

Yes absolutely. Pre-heating allows the weld to take to the steel without the engine block acting as a huge heatsync, pulling heat out of the metal pool as the weld is performed. It also allows less heat to be used to achieve the weld.

Probably the most important thing is that it reduces the thermal differental between the two materials. Consider the length of a block being about 600mm long, and factor in the thermal expansion of iron/steel at 1000 degrees. The block will grow about 7mm in length. Heating allows less thermal variation at the point of the weld between the two materials, and therefore less stresses will be formed in the block when it cools to room temperature again.

Ideally the whole block would be heated in a gas oven, and welded in stages where the block is returned to re-heat and stabilise the block's temperature. It should also be cooled in an oven after the welding is done over 6 hrs or so. One of the engineering shops I work for does this soft of thing all the time. Not with engine blocks, but with other heavy industrial and mining equipment. They also often heat cycle the welded item many times to stress relieve it after welding.

You can liken the induced material stresses to that of a spring or a rubber band stretched to its limit. Or even better, an ARP fastener. Compared to an un-welded item it will take less force exerted to push past the point of elasticity into yield and eventual failure.

Please don't take this as criticism with your project. I take my hat off to anyone willing to have a go but since your posting this publicly expect a few differing opinions.

You lost me after yes absolutely lol

I wasn't thinking the deeply about

More along the lines of stuff warping after an overheat which would be nowhere near the heat that welding would produce nor as quickly

So heating only half the block would do all sorts of weird stuff unless it was heated very slowly

+1

I've not measured a standard block and seen all the mains measure up the same, let alone a welded one. For the extra few hundred dollars its worth the piece of mind. Personally I hate the idea of pulling an engine out of a car to fix something I could have done better if I'd just paid a tiny bit more.

While you might 'get away' with it in a lowish power situation combined with big 2.8+ thou clearences, why would you set an engine up like that if you can do better. Especially in a GTR.

Of course when assembling the block, you would always have to check and see if the block is twisted or sprung on the main bearings. You would make sure that all clearance on the main is right and then go ahead. If its sprung then you would line bore. Every professional engine builder knows that so you guys don't need to worry about if the block is warped or not as we cross that path it will definitely be sorted. But appreciate the comments, warnings and what to look out for, just be aware we already got those covered. All my machining is done free, all my mechanicals is done free so it is not about cost and it is not a dodgy build. The rebuilder just doesn't like the use of a plate and believes that this technique is better and as an engine builder he doesn't want to just buy someone elses product (such as a plate) and assemble even if it may be easier. He has his reasons for not adding 10mm extra for the adaptor plate too. lol.

Regardless, when i started the thread i just want to see if anyone has taken this approach. I was more worried if the strength of the weld would it hold say vibrations from the differential, engine movement etc. Since then, we have drilled the holes and the welds are damn tough, it retains about 12 original holes from and including oil pump so there won't be much pressure on those welded areas anyway and that is why the engine builder builder believes it will work.

Edited by destrukshn

I'd still like to know where the oil pick up is going to go, cause so far it looks like he is using the rb30 one in which case the sump won't fit

If you look below. The extra piece welded on is going to be the new place of the oil pickup. We are going to drill in to the oil galleries and will be using the same oil pick up place as the RB26. It is pretty much replicating the RB26 block and will operate like a RB26 block. The current RB30 oil-pickup will be blocked off. Hope this makes sense and as I said I will provide pictures of the assembled to show what has been done.

Oil%20Pickup%20Will%20Be%20Moved%20To%20Use%20RB26%20One.JPG

  • 5 months later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Howdy friends, So another weird one today, I was looking into replacing some broken clips holding the front grille for the R32 GTR (part number 01553-03831), and noticed the brackets which are supposed to hold the grille in place were also missing 😑. I do recall seeing this issue many years ago, but didn't fix it at the time. A quick look on eBay and I was able to find the genuine brackets, along with all the screws which suited the headlights (part numbers 26042-08U05,26092-08U05). Happy days!....  Once they arrived however there was an extra nut in the packaging which implied that there should also be a bolt or a stud, and sure enough, after a bit of searching I found this thread from 2013, and @Ants clearly shows a stud should be present. Reading around a bit more, it's possible the headlights on my car are the "povo pack" headlights as mentioned by @funkymonkey in this thread way back in 2008. This could explain why the studs are missing on my set of headlights. Looking at the headlight diagram I wasn't able to see a suitable part number for the stud itself. The headlight did indeed have a recess that looked like it would accept a stud, but interestingly no thread or anything obvious how the stud would be affixed to the headlight, I suspect it may have been glued in, press fit, or melted into the plastic at the factory. Another member may be able to clarify if they happen to have a genuine set of N1 headlamps. The only thing we have to work with within the recess is a keyway which likely is there to prevent the stud from rotating within the recess. In any case, back to 3D printing, I put together a model which acts like a pug with a friction fit inside this recess, making use of the keyway so it doesn't rotate while tightening a bolt. Printing in TPU will allow it to slightly swell making a nice snug fit without cracking the part. I've designed the adaptor it to accept an 20 mm M6 bolt (stainless with a cap head in my case), as opposed to the standard M5 stud and I made use of the standard galvanised split washer that came with the genuine brackets from Nissan. Once the bolt and screws were all in place, giving the bracket a gentle shake gave the classic "shaking the car" feeling, very solid, which gives me confidence this is going to be able to hold on much better than the janky solution which seems to have been here for the past decade or so. Overall I'm really pleased with how this turned out and maybe there are more people out there running these headlights without a centre stud at all! Link to the freely available model on Printables: Click here Regards, Sean  
    • Hey everyone, This is my first post apart of the introduction. I tried searching a bit on the forum but couldn't really get a straight answer. I got the car to my mechanic as I felt it being weak. It seems that it was missing on two cylinders due to the injectors. I had all my injectors clean and the car runs much better. The mechanic also confirmed my suspicions that the cat is clogged and needs to be tackled asap. The cat rattles a bit and the hot exhaust warning frequently lights up when driving after getting the injectors clean. In my introduction I was asked about what modification I might be interested in and mentioned a cat delete. From what I was told, this is not really beneficial on the RB20DE and there are more cons than pros.  Could perhaps anyone give some suggestions on what the best course of action would be since the current cat is toast and needs to be removed/replaced anyway? I can also sometimes smell a strong smell of fuel, but I'm not sure if this is related.
    • Hope the cans went down well at least 
    • 255 can't go wrong with the price.
    • When I was replacing my pump due to being stranded in the wrong state, I went with the Deatschwerks 320lph kit. It is a direct plug in to the stock wires, harness, everything. It comes with a plug... but you can plug the OEM plug directly into this thing. https://justjap.com/products/deatschwerks-dw300-fuel-pump-nissan-s13-silvia-r32-r33-r34-skyline-c34-stagea?currency=AUD Downside: Won't actually flow that much on boost if you want to push it on E85, but it's comparable to the 040/255 etc. Little more actually.
×
×
  • Create New...