Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Well I'm in a 34 so I still have 4k left to go before next gear haha but I never dropped out of boost. Once it was on, it was ON!!! On my setup, it started to build around 3800rpms so anything under that was a little boring. My old R33 GTR had -7s and I thought that was a really good setup, managed 320kws and the response was excellent. Perfect for track conditions but being such small turbos, they ran out of puff top end. I believe GTRSean has -9s which I've also been in and those were great turbos too. I do believe Levinboy has them too and his produced pretty good results.

Did you have any other work done to the car, from my research there are alot of guys making full boost with -5's around 4k with adjustable cam gears. 5k is an awuful long time! lol

2.6 = SS's/-9's. Without a big dollar head and setup.

2.8 and bigger = -5's.

It's that simple, unless you're a nuckle dragger 'drag racer' that likes 'peaky power' which feels quicker.... Then they get smashed around twisties by a car that has 100 KW less peak figure.

There seems to be a consensus on this, but I'll put some basic facts into this thread to dispute this quote. Knowing every car and driver is also different also, but I have -5 on a stock rb26 with the basic upgrades, ECU, Boost, injectors, fuel pump, air intake, cam gears (currently set to 0) 20PSI 310kw+. This seems very common based on the rb26 thread. The car is fully stock apart from the engine and yes it is laggy to my likings, but not much more so then when it was stock or others I have driven with -7's or GT'ss. Making good boost around 4000 and coming on full around 4500.

However there's not many GTR’s getting around Wakefield at the NSWSAU days faster than this car, particularly if you discount the race cars. So yes the -5's can push a track car and fast, there's nothing wrong with them and those -7, -9 or gtss will not leave you for dead, it's not that simple.

Saying that, yes I did purchase the -5's with the dream of putting a stroker kit in the car one day, So not really disagreeing, just pointing out there's nothing wrong with -5's on a RB26 without internal work.

Will do, I don't like the format of the current one I have (if I can find it), so next dyno I'll post up in the appropriate thread.

Of cause different dyno's, setting etc make them not the best to compare unless they are side by side, so they could easily miss a 200rpm difference.

And yes the -5's seem to like either a little more boost or a larger displacement to get to their sweet spot, so if 300kw is your goal then go smaller, if you want the option of more power you should consider the -5's.

It does not have RPM duh... :yucky:

Have you seen the car at a SAUNSW trackday anytime recently? And any of the multiple video's posted from the in car cam.

I am also not disputing a smaller turbo comes on sooner, physics tells you that, just the use of -5's will not leave you for dead in the twisties.

Again I am "just pointing out there's nothing wrong with -5's on a RB26 without internal work." And they get better when you get some major work done.

link form the last track day, just short ones with a bit of action. 1.08.788 was best for the day.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/395799-wakefield-wrap-up-thread/page__st__120

Thats cheap second hand coilovers, stock suspension apart from that. Running PULP, driving to the track and back.

his my dyno sheet with -5s and 3-3.2-3.4inch exhuast, on Bp98 super safe for the track and my crazy "not giving a fark driving"

post-16000-0-90336600-1335934522_thumb.jpg

and heres alil bit of it in action

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWklfwukDAs

ive got all the bits coming for a 2.5inch to 4inch merge and 2x 4inch straight though mufflers, plus jez just ordered in some ID2K injectors and Twin Nismo pumps, so there will be an e85 tune coming in the next month or so. time will tell!!!

hey just a late entry here. ive got 2530's on my stock bottom end 26 as well with some headwork and yes it is a little laggy but the top end feels great. currently running a Reytec ecu which is getting replaced with a platinum pro with new fuel setup to support e85, JEM reckons can push to the 400ish awkw mark with this setup. currently on 7psi (wwwaaayyy out of its efficiency range) it makes 216awkw, but dialling a couple more psi sees it hit 250 easily. this is with cams (un dialled) slight port and all the usual supporting mods (stock airbox)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Very nice - I also have a 92 GTST and hardly see any others around these days
    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
×
×
  • Create New...