Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

naw he said the pump is pumping fine

sorry cant be more specific he was talking about it and i wasnt sure if he ment he was gunna look @ it then for the air leak and mentioned regulator but didnt think it was that

he took the AFM off i think the young fella sprayed it and after that it made the 175KW

i got it on camera but its very poor and all you get is mostly sound which distorts over like 4000rpm

  • Replies 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

im fairly sure the stock pump cant handle much more than 175rwkw, thats where mine cut out anyway. i went for the bosch 040 internal, they handle up to 250kw. it made a huge difference, very valuable upgrade that one! :whistling:

ah ok sumthing to look into them whats the cheaper walbro (not sure spellling like the $180 one)

here is link very very poor footage

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPr4_TLD0iY

I got Shaun to put in the Walbro FP and i have had NO issues with mine also.......buth pumps are pretty identical!

my R34 is leaning out in the top end, and I think I would be making a little more power than that - so I think it is true what Sam said. I have just bought a Walbro 255lph pump off Ebay for $125 delivered .... and am going to chuck in a Sard fuel regulator while I'm at it - then get the SAFCII tuned by Donnon, to hopefully make around the 200rwkw mark I am hoping. :whistling:

yeah he didnt push it was possibly leaning out too much or sum other issues i forget

i know after 140kw he wasnt happy about that and knew there should be more in it thats when he took the AFM off and started looking arround @ stuff

i didnt bother getting the dyno chart cause it was incomplete

anyways off to bed got a wedding to drive in tomorrow :whistling:

Edited by Madaz
yeah, I have an 044 in mine, and it's making about 200rwkw (estimate!), I would have thought the skyline setup would streach a bit further than 175?

The cars are getting old.. They pumps are getting lazy. :whistling:

Mine crapped out at around 67,000km's and 160rwkw.

spotted a chick in an orange 32 with front bar in primer coming out of modbury triangle. Also a P plater chick in a maroon r33 down port rush. Looks like most hotties are getting into imports now...

hah the orange 32 is flick from CSA / SHY, luke (skylineguy19) girlfriend............her old car was the black NOT URS lancer..........the car was owned by a chick called erin from NS i believe....

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...