Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys now I have almost finished putting the rb26 into my BMW coupe now I'm stuck as the rear turbo leaves no room for a dump and hits the abs unit and I don't want to cut up the BMW. So my options are twin high mount or a decent single t67? My power goal is 300+ so a t67 would be the biggest can anyone tell me realtime experience with a t67 rb26 combo?

Yes iv searched google and read rb26 dyno thread

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/397508-rb26-turbo-doing-my-head-in/
Share on other sites

like Zebra said, I wouldnt expect much difference to the RB25.

There are also 3 or 4 mentions of 98 tuned variants from STATUS which got about that 330kw mark, again similar response to a 3076 maybe a tad less.

The best rwd rb combo I ever put together was a trust T67 10cm on a trust manifold attached to a 25 then a 25/30 in a r32gts-t with 4.3:1 gears and 25 box.

The 3lt was a monster but ran out of legs/revs... a 26 would have been perfect!

The t67 easily run up 330rwkw on the 25.

It'd be my pick for your application and power target.

Cheers

Justin

Then try find a 3 bolt 10cm housing. Rocking house shit im telling you.

Kando 10cm are t3 only. Why not make things really easy and buy one of those with a eBay steam pipe manifold?

Then you can say now that was easy, and I'll be like... O RLY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Everyone is too used to learning from places like HPA "how to tune" and what to expect at what point, rather than being able to see "The computer says I'm in cell with Row = 8, column =4, and I can see my fuel is lean, so lets add more" Everyone wants "real units", which helps for someone picking it up for the first time and seeing how bad the tune is if they're not used to touching it.   However, I think for most of us who want to play with it, you're 100% right, we're only needing to learn about it for OUR CAR. Which makes it great, and we don't need to care what the real values are, we just need to know which cell it is, that's causing the lean or rich point, or that we want more ignition timing or less. But again, everyone wants everything super you beaut and nearly self tuning, with VE maps, and a billion compensations...   Though then there's me over here when I'm doing reverse engineering work just reading data in hex format that most people couldn't work anything out from. Yet I can see what's going on.
    • Um. No. Since Matt introduced the TIM it has become a lot easier to deal with the consequences of changing K for AFM and injector swaps. Then, tuning is a f**king doddle. No-one needs to know or care how many grams of air are flowing or any other bullshit. Need more fuel in a cell? Add more fuel. Need more timing in a cell. Add more timing. Need to adjust any of the other tables for warm up and so on? No harder than anything else. Sure - it's not an ECU system for starting from scratch on an arbitrary engine. But then.....it was never supposed to be, not recommended for, and almost never used that way. So.... On your engine, in particular, Nistune/Nissan OEM is about as sophisticated and difficult as banging 2 rocks together. Those ECUs are primitive and simple. There is nothing difficult there. I learnt Nistune from scratch, created new maps with extended axes, interpolated/extrapolated the original maps onto them and tuned my RB20 (basically the same ECU as your 26 ECU) all by myself, more than 20 years ago. And that was long before even TIM.
×
×
  • Create New...