Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Plus another 200 CC Mark :P.

Was out there again today. Another few little things crossed off the list. Boys have been snowed under. Yavuz reckons fire up Tuesday or Wednesday. Wahoo!

You've got 12 days left!

This is true.

On a side note, I dont think I will have time (read:UNIGROUP) to hook up launch control, so all the cheater AWD vehicles may have a slight advantage at the NATS.

Im drunk, punch me in the face, I deserve it...................

Horse power is how hard you hit the wall. Torque is how far you drag it behind you.

This is true.

On a side note, I dont think I will have time (read:UNIGROUP) to hook up launch control, so all the cheater AWD vehicles may have a slight advantage at the NATS.

Im drunk, punch me in the face, I deserve it...................

Horse power is how hard you hit the wall. Torque is how far you drag it behind you.

I reckon you'd be hard pressed to get that done. You got tyres sorted? When you going E85 farken?

I reckon you'd be hard pressed to get that done. You got tyres sorted? When you going E85 farken?

Tyres = M/T Street Radials

E85= When Caltex (or any other supplier) have it in every servo, like they said they would in 2010 :verymad:

Tyres = M/T Street Radials

E85= When Caltex (or any other supplier) have it in every servo, like they said they would in 2010 :verymad:

Sensor mate. This issue no longer exists. It's getting there. You have the powah with the Link ;).

Sensor mate. This issue no longer exists. It's getting there. You have the powah with the Link ;).

Ive been a bit scared off with the sensor, Ive heard (google farkin) there has been a bad batch of them giving iffy readings, Ill give it 12 months and if it seems that the issues are sorted then Ill go in balls and all.

All I need is the sensor thingie, injectors, fuel pumps, lines and tune, and around 3-4k of loose change.

And I still need to get the Link tuned for PSI Vs road speed, gotta love the Link.

Went out today and lent a little hand. Brakes are bled, all belts are on and intake piping on the passenger side is on. Exhaust is on, fuel system changes are almost complete (I've moved the ethanol sensor into the boot so it's not in the engine bay).

20121105_172529.jpg

Almost complete bay.

20121105_181723.jpg

It's voluptuous behind with the "standard" exhaust.

Well mine's on the road :D

Put 270km on it, running it in.

Tune is next.

You're a machine!!!!

My start up is today with anyluck. Check for leaks, timing and onto the rollers. :D

That's three white GTRs I know of racing to get back on the road!!!

Looking good paul

Mine fired up in the garage last night. Bleed the 4wd, change of rims and few vac line tidies and I'm ready for a tune. Paul, get your beast out of Unigroup so they can tune mine! :domokun::nyaanyaa:

Mine fired up in the garage last night. Bleed the 4wd, change of rims and few vac line tidies and I'm ready for a tune. Paul, get your beast out of Unigroup so they can tune mine! :domokun::nyaanyaa:

Haha I'm trying!!! I'll hopefully be doing skidz this arvo. Did you drive it Eric? Any idea what your goals are? Where are you gonna limit boost? 260 poncams?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...