Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

got your email man :) Thanks.

Matty, The RH9 car I'm talking about was an R32. When i saw it it was about 10-12 years ago. It's probably changed hands/plates/dead. Short stocky/chubby dude owned it. Can't remember his name though.

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I got contacted by superjet760 earlier in the month regarding some parts; I believe he still owns the R32 that is running 8's, number plate is RH9GTR. He's still around these parts

The (other) GTR with plates just RH9 was that Midnight Purple II R34, right?

Can vouch for Michael's R33, it's fat

:)

Paul (superjet760) still owns the [RH9GTR] beast - it is for sale, but hasn't been sold yet.

mmmm sailing!

Well peeps... first shoot has just wrapped up. GTRSEAN got his car ready with a few hours notice and althought I can't post anything up here just let me say the results are Amazingly Jizz Worthy. :D Looking forward to the next shoot already.

I'd just like to say a big thank you before I depart this country for a few months haha... :( for taking the time to photograph the beast. :D

Looking forward to the pics, even though I've seen a couple ;)

Thanks Terry, we did talk about your N1 and Matt's Nur getting some photo sexy times too ;D

I won't be able to post any more from the set until after it's all published but here's an unfinished shot from the set. Just to show you guys what we're talking about. :)

6959786144_a7116fdbf5_b.jpg

lol. Special location. RAAF base Richmond yeah?

Love the mountains in the distance. Spent some time there but never saw it as good looking as that.

Well done Matt, and Sean.

Yeah guys, taken at the RAAF base looking across the runways towards one of the best sunsets I've seen all year. I've updated that pic I posted with the final version of that shot now. Like I said before I can't post any more other than the teaser until after it's all published. :(

I don't think it has a pearl, it's just polished like a mofo and the colours from the sky were coming out in the paint.

It won't let me edit... so you secretly get two. That first pic isn't 100% complete as it was posted anyway so I don't feel bad :P Here's the official teaser.

7109194101_0a66177e66_b.jpg

Edited by MaTBoY

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
    • Dort sounds above 3k rpm are dorty 🤣 I might krinkle black the alloy 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...